In this retrospective multicentre cohort study, we present the results of primary single-finger flexor tendon repairs in zones 1 to 3 between 2014 and 2021. Data from 218 patients were retrieved with their demographics, injury and surgery characteristics and therapy outcomes. The data were systematically collected and analysed at predefined time points up to 1 year after surgery. A good to excellent return of motion was achieved by 77% (Tang classification) and 92% (American Association for Surgery of the Hand classification) of patients at 1 year. The tendon rupture rate was 8.7%. Time had a significant impact on the recovery of finger motion and grip strength of up to 1 year, of patient satisfaction and upper extremity function up to 26 weeks, and of pain up to 13 weeks after surgery. Our results demonstrate that it is worthwhile to assess therapy outcomes over various measurement periods, as some outcomes may continue to improve up to 1 year after flexor tendon repair surgery.
AasheimTFinsenV.The DASH and the QuickDASH instruments. Normative values in the general population in Norway. J Hand Surg Eur. 2014,
39: 140–4.
2.
ArnerM.Developing a national quality registry for hand surgery: Challenges and opportunities. EFORT Open Rev. 2016,
1: 100–6.
3.
BarrieKATomakSLCholewickiJWolfeSW.The role of multiple strands and locking sutures on gap formation of flexor tendon repairs during cyclical loading. J Hand Surgery Am. 2000,
25: 714–20.
4.
Beckmann-FriesVCalcagniMSchrepferLKaempfenAVögelinETobler-AmmannB.Relationship between pain, nerve injury and clinical outcomes after flexor tendon injuries in zones 1–2: A retrospective cohort study. J Hand Ther. 2023,
28: 60–71.
5.
BohannonRW.Minimal clinically important difference for grip strength: A systematic review. J Phys Ther Sci. 2019,
31: 75–8.
6.
ChangMKAcharyyaSLimZYTaySC.Clinical outcomes of zone 2 flexor tendon repairs using the modified Lim/Tsai technique. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2019,
24: 83–8.
7.
ChangMKTaySC.Flexor tendon injuries and repairs: A single centre experience. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2018,
23: 487–95.
8.
CohenJ.A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992,
112: 155–9.
9.
de GrootJAJanssenKJZwindermanAHBossuytPMReitsmaJBMoonsKG.Correcting for partial verification bias: A comparison of methods. Ann Epidemiol. 2011,
21: 139–48.
10.
ElliotDMoiemenNSFlemmingAFHarrisSBFosterAJ.The rupture rate of acute flexor tendon repairs mobilized by the controlled active motion regimen. J Hand Surg Br. 1994,
19: 607–12.
11.
FranchignoniFVercelliSGiordanoASartorioFBraviniEFerrieroG.Minimal clinically important difference of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure (DASH) and its shortened version (QuickDASH). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014,
44: 30–9.
12.
GermannGHarthAWindGDemirE.[Standardisation and validation of the German version 2.0 of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, Hand (DASH) questionnaire]. Unfallchirurg. 2003,
106: 13–9.
13.
GiesenTReissnerLBesmensIPolitikouOCalcagniM.Flexor tendon repair in the hand with the M-Tang technique (without peripheral sutures), pulley division, and early active motion. J Hand Surg Eur. 2018,
43: 474–9.
14.
GireJDKoltsovJCBSegoviaNAKenneyDEYaoJLaddAL.Single assessment numeric evaluation (sane) in hand surgery: Does a one-question outcome instrument compare favorably?J Hand Surg Am. 2020,
45: 589–96.
15.
HigginsALalondeDHBellMMcKeeDLalondeJF.Avoiding flexor tendon repair rupture with intraoperative total active movement examination. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010,
126: 941–5.
16.
JesterAHarthARauchJGermannG. [
DASH data of non-clinical versus clinical groups of persons–a comparative study of T-norms for clinical use]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2010,
42: 55–64.
17.
KadhumMGeorgiouAKanapathyM, et al.
Operative outcomes for wide awake local anesthesia versus regional and general anesthesia for flexor tendon repair. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2022,
41: 125–30.
18.
KnoblochKKuehnMPapstSKraemerRVogtPM.German standardized translation of the Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire for patient-related outcome measurement in Dupuytren disease. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011,
128: 39e–40e.
19.
MarksMHerrenDBVliet VlielandTPSimmenBRAngstFGoldhahnJ.Determinants of patient satisfaction after orthopedic interventions to the hand: A review of the literature. J Hand Ther. 2011,
24: 303–12.e10; quiz 12.
20.
MathiowetzV.Comparison of Rolyan and Jamar dynamometers for measuring grip strength. Occup Ther Int. 2002,
9: 201–9.
21.
NeiduskiRLPowellRK.Flexor tendon rehabilitation in the 21st century: A systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2019,
32: 165–74.
22.
NewingtonLRossRHowellJW.Relative motion flexion splinting for the rehabilitation of flexor tendon repairs: A systematic review. Hand Therapy. 2021,
26: 102–12.
23.
PanZJPanLXuYFMaTYaoLH.Outcomes of 200 digital flexor tendon repairs using updated protocols and 30 repairs using an old protocol: Experience over 7 years. J Hand Surg Eur. 2020,
45: 56–63.
24.
PeckFHKennedySMWatsonJSLeesVC.An evaluation of the influence of practitioner-led hand clinics on rupture rates following primary tendon repair in the hand. Br J Plast Surg. 2004,
57: 45–9.
25.
PeckFHRoeAENgCYDuffCMcGroutherDALeesVC.The Manchester short splint: A change to splinting practice in the rehabilitation of zone ii flexor tendon repairs. J Hand Ther. 2014,
19: 47–53.
26.
PettengillKM.The evolution of early mobilization of the repaired flexor tendon. J Hand Ther. 2005,
18: 157–68.
27.
RandallDJZhangYLiHHubbardJCKazmersNH.Establishing the minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit for the pain visual analog scale in a postoperative hand surgery population. J Hand Surg Am. 2022,
47: 645–53.
28.
ReissnerLFischerGListRTaylorWRGiovanoliPCalcagniM.Minimal detectable difference of the finger and wrist range of motion: Comparison of goniometry and 3D motion analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019,
14: 173.
29.
SellesRWWoutersRMPoelstraR, et al.
Routine health outcome measurement: Development, design, and implementation of the hand and wrist cohort. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020,
146: 343–54.
30.
SterneJAWhiteIRCarlinJB, et al.
Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: Potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009,
338: b2393.
31.
StrauchBLangA.The ten test revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003,
112: 593–4.
32.
SvingenJWiigMTuressonCFarneboSArnerM.Risk factors for reoperation after flexor tendon repair: A registry study. J Hand Surg Eur. 2022,
47: 1071–6.
33.
TangJB.Outcomes and evaluation of flexor tendon repair. Hand Clin. 2013,
29: 251–9.
TangJB.Recent evolutions in flexor tendon repairs and rehabilitation. J Hand Surg Eur. 2018b,
43: 469–73.
36.
TangJBLalondeDHarhausLSadekAFMoriyaKPanZJ.Flexor tendon repair: Recent changes and current methods. J Hand Surg Eur. 2021: 17531934211053757.
37.
TangJBZhouXPanZJQingJGongKTChenJ.Strong digital flexor tendon repair, extension-flexion test, and early active flexion: Experience in 300 tendons. Hand Clin. 2017,
33: 455–63.
38.
von ElmEAltmanDGEggerMPocockSJGotzschePCVandenbrouckeJP.The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014,
12: 1495–9.
39.
WoutersRMJobi-OdeneyeAOde la TorreAJosephAHoviusSER.A standard set for outcome measurement in patients with hand and wrist conditions: Consensus by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement Hand and Wrist Working Group. J Hand Surg Am. 2021,
46: 841–55.e7.
40.
WoythalLCominsJDBrorsonS.Patient-reported outcome measures for patients with hand-specific impairments-a scoping review. J Hand Ther. 2021,
34: 594–603.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
