Statistics in publishing: the (mis)use of the p -value (Part 2)

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amrhein

Greenland

McShane

Retire statistical significance. Nature. 2019, 567: 305–7.

Broekstra

de Boer

Stunt

JJ.

Statistics in publishing: the (mis)use of the p-value (part 1). J Hand Surg Eur. 2022a, 47: 677–80.

Broekstra

Mouton

van der Sluis

IJpma

FFA

Stenekes

MW.

Hand function in patients with distal radius factures after home-based kinaesthetic motor imagery training. J Hand Surg Eur. 2022, 47: 656–58.

Cohen

The earth is round (p < 0.05). Am Psychol. 1994, 49: 997–1003.

Goodman

A dirty dozen: twelve p-value misconceptions. Semin Hematol. 2008, 45: 135–40.

Greenland

Senn

Rothman

, et al. Statistical tests, p-values confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016, 31: 337–50.

Rosendaal

FR.

The p-value: a clinician’s disease?

Eur J Intern Med. 2016, 35: 20–3.

Rafi

Greenland

Semantic and cognitive tools to aid statistical science: replace confidence and significance by compatibility and surprise. BMC Medical Res Methodol. 2020, 20: 244.

Szucs

Ioannidis

JPA.

When null hypothesis significance testing is unsuitable for research: a reassessment.

Front Hum Neurosci. 2017, 11: 390.

10.

Trafimow

A taxonomy of model assumptions on which p is based and implications for added benefit in the sciences. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2019a. 22: 571–83.

11.

Trafimow

A frequentist alternative to significance testing, p-values and confidence intervals. Econometrics. 2019b, 7: https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics7020026

12.

Trafimow

Using the coefficient of confidence to make the philosophical switch from a posteriori to a priori inferential statistics. Educ Psychol Meas. 2017, 77: 831–54.