The current clinical methods of flexor tendon repair are remarkably different from those used 20 years ago. This article starts with a review of the current methods, followed by presentation of past experience and current status of six eminent hand surgery units from four continents/regions. Many units are using, or are moving toward using, the recent strong (multi-strand) core suture method together with a simpler peripheral suture. Venting of the critical pulleys over less than 2 cm length is safe and favours functional recovery. These repair and recent motion protocols lead to remarkably more reliable repairs, with over 80% good or excellent outcomes achieved rather consistently after Zone 2 repair along with infrequent need of tenolysis. Despite slight variations in repair methods, they all consider general principles and should be followed. Outcomes of Zone 2 repairs are not dissimilar to those in other zones with very low to zero incidence of rupture.
AyhanETunaZOksuzC. Getting better results in flexor tendon surgery and therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021, 9: e3432.
2.
BeardJDRobinsonJSmoutJ. Problem-based learning for surgical trainees. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002, 84: 227–9.
3.
Chen J, Xian Zhang A, Jia Qian S, Jing Wang Y. Measurement of finger joint motion after flexor tendon repair: smartphone photography compared with traditional goniometry. J Hand Surg Eur. 2021, 46: 825–9
4.
GiesenTSirotakovaMCopseyAJElliotD. Flexor pollicis longus primary repair: further experience with the Tang technique and controlled active mobilization. J Hand Surg Eur. 2009, 34: 758–61.
5.
GiesenTReissnerLBesmensI, et al.Flexor tendon repair in the hand with the M-Tang technique (without peripheral sutures), pulley division, and early active motion. J Hand Surg Eur. 2018, 43: 474–9.
6.
LalondeDH. Conceptual origins, current practice, and views of wide awake hand surgery. J Hand Surg Eur. 2017, 42: 886–95.
7.
LalondeDHigginsA. Wide awake flexor tendon repair in the finger. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016, 4: e797.
8.
LalondeDHMartinA (2013a) Epinephrine in local anesthesia in finger and hand surgery: the case for wide-awake anesthesia. J Am Acad Orthop Surg21: 443.
9.
LalondeDHMartinAL (2013b) Wide-awake flexor tendon repair and early tendon mobilization in Zones 1 and 2. Hand Clin29: 207–13.
10.
KotsisSVChungKC. Application of the “see one, do one, teach one” concept in surgical training. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013, 131: 1194–201.
11.
MealsCLalondeDCandelierG. Repaired flexor tendon excursion with half a fist of true active movement versus full fist place and hold in the awake patient. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019, 7: e2074.
12.
MoriyaKYoshizuTMakiYTsubokawaNNarisawaHEndoN. Clinical outcomes of early active mobilization following flexor tendon repair using the six-strand technique: short- and long-term evaluations. J Hand Surg Eur. 2015, 40: 250–8.
13.
MoriyaKYoshizuTTsubokawaNNarisawaHHaraKMakiY (2016a) Outcomes of release of the entire A4 pulley after flexor tendon repairs in Zone 2A followed by early active mobilization. J Hand Surg Eur41: 400–5.
14.
MoriyaKYoshizuTTsubokawaNNarisawaHHaraKMakiY (2016b) Clinical results of releasing the entire A2 pulley after flexor tendon repair in Zone 2C. J Hand Surg Eur41: 822–8.
15.
MoriyaKYoshizuTTsubokawaNNarisawaHMakiY. Incidence of tenolysis and features of adhesions in the digital flexor tendons after multi-strand repair and early active motion. J Hand Surg Eur. 2019, 44: 354–60.
16.
MoriyaKYoshizuTTsubokawaNNarisawaHMatsuzawaSMakiY. Outcomes of flexor tendon repairs in Zone 2 subzones with early active mobilization. J Hand Surg Eur. 2017, 42: 896–902.
17.
NormanGRSchmidtHG. The psychological basis of problem-based learning: a review of the evidence. Acad Med. 1992, 67: 557–65.
18.
PanZJPanLXuYFMaTYaoLH. Outcomes of 200 digital flexor tendon repairs using updated protocols and 30 repairs using an old protocol: experience over 7 years. J Hand Surg Eur. 2020, 45: 56–63.
19.
PanZJQinJZhouXChenJ. Robust thumb flexor tendon repairs with a six-strand M-Tang method, pulley venting, and early active motion. J Hand Surg Eur. 2017, 42: 909–14.
20.
PanZJXuYFPanLChenJ. Zone 2 flexor tendon repairs using a tensioned strong core suture, sparse peripheral stitches and early active motion: results in 60 fingers. J Hand Surg Eur. 2019, 44: 361–6.
21.
PrsicABass JL.Re: Moriya KYoshizuTTsubokawaN, et al.Outcomes of release of the entire A4 pulley after flexor tendon repairs in Zone 2A followed by early active mobilization. J Hand Surg Eur. 2016, 41: 400–5. Comment. J Hand Surg Eur. 2016, 41: 460.
22.
SadekAF. Flexor digitorum profundus with or without flexor digitorum superficialis tendon repair in acute Zone 2B injuries. J Hand Surg Eur. 2020, 45: 1034–44.
23.
TangJB. The double sheath system and tendon gliding in Zone 2C. J Hand Surg Br. 1995, 20: 281–5.
24.
TangJB. Indications, methods, postoperative motion and outcome evaluation of primary flexor tendon repairs in Zone 2. J Hand Surg Eur. 2007, 32: 118–29.
25.
Tang JB. Outcomes and evaluation of flexor tendon repair. Hand Clin. 2013, 29: 251–9
26.
TangJB. New developments are improving flexor tendon repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018, 141: 1427–37.
TangJB. Rehabilitation after flexor tendon repair and others: a safe and efficient protocol. J Hand Surg Eur. 2021, 46: 813–7.
29.
TangJBShiD. Subdivision of flexor tendon ‘no man’s land’ and different treatment methods in each sub-zone. A preliminary report. Chin Med J. 1992, 105: 60–8.
30.
TangJBZhouXPanZJQingJGongKTChenJ. Strong digital flexor tendon repair, extension-flexion test, and early active flexion: experience in 300 tendons. Hand Clin. 2017, 33: 455–63.
