For centuries, various techniques have been described to stabilize the carpus on the ulna in radial dysplasia to achieve a straight wrist, in the belief that it is better for function and cosmesis. Apart from ulnocarpal fusion, none had succeeded in preventing recurrence of radial deviation. Ulnocarpal fusion, however, carries the risk of shortening an already shortened forearm by damaging the epiphysis. Fingers are often stiff in radial dysplasia, and therefore a straight wrist may actually limit function. Formal assessment of the appearance in operated versus unoperated wrists remain inconclusive. This article challenges the dogma that a straight wrist should be the ideal goal in radial dysplasia. The optimum management of this condition remains debatable.
BayneLGKlugMS. Long-term review of the surgical treatment of radial deficiencies. J Hand Surg Am. 1987, 12: 169–79.
2.
BuffartLRoebroeckMJanssemW, et al.Hand function and activity performance of children with longitudinal radial deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008, 90: 2408–15.
3.
CarrollR. Use of the fibula for reconstruction in congenital absence of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996, 48: 1012.
4.
DamoreEKozinSThoderJPorterS. The recurrence of deformity after surgical centralization for radial clubhand. J Hand Surg Am. 2000, 25: 745–51.
5.
DanaCAureganmJCSalonAGueroS. Recurrence of radial bowing after soft tissue distraction and subsequent radialization for radial longitudinal deficiency. J Hand Surg Am. 2012, 37: 2082–7.
6.
de JongJPMoranSVilkkiS. Changing paradigms in the treatment of radial club hand: microvascular joint transfer for correction of radial deviation and preservation of long-term growth. Clin Orthop Surg. 2012, 4: 36–44.
7.
EkblomAGDahlinLRosbergHWiigMWernerMArnerM. Hand function in children with radial longitudinal deficiency. BMC Musculoskel Disord. 2013, 14: 116–29.
8.
EkblomAGDahlinLRosbergHWiigMWernerMArnerMA. Hand function in adults with radial longitudinal deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014, 96: 1178–84.
9.
Frankel ME, Goldner JL, Stelling FH. Radial Club Hand: Is Centralization Necessary? A Rational Surgical Approach. In: Proceedings of The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. J Bone and Joint Surg. 1971, 53-A: 1026.
10.
GoldfarbCAKleppsSDaileyLAManskePR. Functional outcome after centralization for radius dysplasia. J Hand Surg Am. 2002, 27: 118–24.
11.
HeikelHV. Aplasia and hypoplasa of the radius: studies on 64 cases and on epiphyseal transplantation in rabbits with the imitated defect. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1959, 39: 1–155.
12.
InnocentiMDelcroixLManfriniMCerusoMCapannaR. Vascularized proximal fibular epiphyseal transfer for distal radial reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005, 87(Suppl 1): 237–246.
13.
KotwalPPVarshneyMKSoralAVM. Comparison of surgical treatment and nonoperative management for radial longitudinal deficiency. J Hand Surg Eur. 2011, 37: 161–9.
14.
ManskeMCWallLBSteffenJAGoldfarbCA. The effect of soft tissue distraction on deformity recurrence after centralization for radial longitudinal deficiency. J Hand Surg Am. 2014, 39: 895–901.
15.
MazharFNShariatzadehHBalvardiMAmroodiMNMirzaeiA. Recurrence rate of radial deviation following the centralization surgery of radial club hand. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2018, 32: 18.
