Abstract
We systematically reviewed prospective studies for five hand procedures to analyse postoperative follow-up time, clinical or radiographic plateau, and whether the authors provide justification for times used. Demographic data, outcomes and mean follow-up were analysed. A total of 188 articles met our inclusion criteria. The mean postoperative follow-up time among these studies were carpal tunnel release, 21 months (range 1.5–111); cubital tunnel release, 27 months (2.5–46); open reduction and internal fixation for the distal radius fracture, 24 months (3–120); thumb carpometacarpal joint arthroplasty, 64 months (8.5–228); and flexor tendon repair, 25 months (3–59). Authors provided justification for follow-up intervals in 10% of these reports. We conclude that most prospective clinical studies in hand surgery do not properly justify follow-up length. Clinically unnecessary follow-up is costly without much benefit. In prospective research, we believe justified postoperative follow-up is essential, based on expected time to detect clinical plateau, capture complications and determine the need for secondary surgery.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
