GiesenTReissnerLBesmensIPolitikouOCalcagniM. Flexor tendon repair in the hand with the M-Tang technique (without peripheral sutures), pulley division, and early active motion. J Hand Surg Eur. 2018, 43: 474–9.
2.
LalondeDH. Conceptual origins, current practice, and views of wide awake hand surgery. J Hand Surg Eur. 2017, 42: 886–95.
3.
MoriyaKYoshizuTMakiYTsubokawaNNarisawaHEndoN. Clinical outcomes of early active mobilization following flexor tendon repair using the six-strand technique: short- and long-term evaluations. J Hand Surg Eur. 2015, 40: 250–8.
4.
MoriyaKYoshizuTTsubokawaNNarisawaHMatsuzawaSMakiY. Outcomes of flexor tendon repairs in zone 2 subzones with early active mobilization. J Hand Surg Eur. 2017, 42: 896–902.
5.
PanZJXuYFPanLChenJ. Zone 2 flexor tendon repairs using a tensioned strong core suture, sparse peripheral stitches and early active motion: results in 60 fingers. J Hand Surg Eur. 2019, 44: 361–6.
6.
ReissnerLZechmann-MuellerNKleinHJCalcagniMGiesenT. Sonographic study of repair, gapping and tendon bowstringing after primary flexor digitorum profundus repair in zone 2. J Hand Surg Eur. 2018, 43: 480–6.
7.
TangJB. Recent evolutions in flexor tendon repairs and rehabilitation. J Hand Surg Eur. 2018a, 43: 469–73.
8.
TangJB. New developments are improving flexor tendon repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018b, 14: 1427–37.
9.
WongJLinCHChangNJChenHCLinYTHsuCC. Digital revascularization and replantation using the wide-awake hand surgery technique. J Hand Surg Eur. 2017, 42: 621–5.
10.
ZhouXLiXRQingJJiaXFChenJ. Outcomes of the six-strand M-Tang repair for zone 2 primary flexor tendon repair in 54 fingers. J Hand Surg Eur. 2017, 42: 462–8.
