Chang MK, Wong YR, Tay SC. Biomechanical comparison of modified Lim/Tsai tendon repairs with intra- and extra-tendinous knots. J Hand Surg Eur. 2018: 919–24.
2.
ChangMKWongYRTaySC. Biomechanical comparison of the Lim/Tsai tendon repair with a modified method using a single looped suture. J Hand Surg Eur. 2017, 42: 915–9.
3.
FruehFSKunzVSGravestockIJet al.Primary flexor tendon repair in zones 1 and 2: early passive mobilization versus controlled active motion. J Hand Surg Am. 2014, 39: 1344–50.
4.
GiesenTReissnerLBesmensIPolitikouOCalcagniM. Flexor tendon repair in the hand with the M-Tang technique (without peripheral sutures), pulley division, and early active motion. J Hand Surg Eur. 2018, 43: 474–9.
5.
GiesenTSirotakovaMCopseyAJElliotD. Flexor pollicis longus primary repair: further experience with the Tang technique and controlled active mobilization. J Hand Surg Eur. 2009, 34: 758–61.
6.
LalondeDH. Conceptual origins, current practice, and views of wide awake hand surgery. J Hand Surg Eur. 2017, 42: 886–95.
7.
LeppänenOVLinnanmäkiLHavulinnaJGöranssonH. Suture configurations and biomechanical properties of flexor tendon repairs by 16 hand surgeons in Finland. J Hand Surg Eur. 2016, 41: 831–7.
8.
MoriyaKYoshizuTTsubokawaNNarisawaHHaraKMakiY. Outcomes of release of the entire A4 pulley after flexor tendon repairs in zone 2A followed by early active mobilization. J Hand Surg Eur. 2016a, 41: 400–5.
9.
MoriyaKYoshizuTTsubokawaNNarisawaHHaraKMakiY. Clinical results of releasing the entire A2 pulley after flexor tendon repair in zone 2C. J Hand Surg Eur. 2016b, 41: 822–8.
10.
MoriyaKYoshizuTTsubokawaNNarisawaHMatsuzawaSMakiY. Outcomes of flexor tendon repairs in zone 2 subzones with early active mobilization. J Hand Surg Eur. 2017, 42: 896–902.
11.
PanZJQinJZhouXChenJ. Robust thumb flexor tendon repairs with a six-strand M-Tang method, pulley venting, and early active motion. J Hand Surg Eur. 2017, 42: 909–14.
12.
RigóIZHaugstvedtJRRøkkumM. The effect of adding active flexion to modified Kleinert regime on outcomes for zone 1 to 3 flexor tendon repairs. A prospective randomized trial. J Hand Surg Eur. 2017, 42: 920–9.
13.
RigoIZRøkkumM. Predictors of outcome after primary flexor tendon repair in zone 1, 2 and 3. J Hand Surg Eur. 2016, 41: 793–801.
14.
TangJB. Clinical outcomes associated with flexor tendon repair. Hand Clin. 2005, 21: 199–210.
15.
TangJBZhouXPanZJQingJGongKTChenJ. Strong digital flexor tendon repair, extension-flexion test, and early active flexion: experience in 300 tendons. Hand Clin. 2017, 33: 455–63.
16.
WuYFTangJB. Recent developments in flexor tendon repair techniques and factors influencing strength of the tendon repair. J Hand Surg Eur. 2014, 39: 6–19.
17.
ZhouXLiXRQinJJiaXFChenJ. Outcomes of the six-strand M-Tang repair for zone 2 primary flexor tendon repair in 54 fingers. J Hand Surg Eur. 2017, 42: 462–8.
