The purpose of this study was to better define an ideal tendon transfer suture construct to allow for early active range of motion. A side-to-side tendon construct was used to test suture technique (cross stich vs. Krackow stitch), number of suture throws, and calibre of suture. A minimum load to failure of 100 N was used to comfortably allow early motion while minimizing rupture risk. All constructs tested, except the 4-0 Krackow construct, were strong enough to withstand 100 N of load. The choice of suture should be based on surgeon preference, patient compliance, and specific surgery, and 3-0 non-absorbable suture may be more suitable for tendon transfers from a yield force standpoint.
BidicSMVarshneyARuffMDOrensteinHH. Biomechanical comparison of lasso, pulvertaft weave, and side-by-side tendon repairs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009, 124: 567–71.
2.
BoyerMIGelbermanRHBurnsMEDinopoulosHHofemRSilvaMJ. Intrasynovial flexor tendon repair. An experimental study comparing low and high levels of in vivo force during rehabilitation in canines. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001, 83: 891–9.
3.
BrownSHHentzenERKwanAWardSRFridénJLieberRL. Mechanical strength of the side-to-side versus pulvertaft weave tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2010, 35: 540–5.
4.
FreehaferAAPeckhamPHKeithMW. Determination of muscle-tendon unit properties during tendon transfer. J Hand Surg Am. 1979, 4: 331–9.
5.
FridénJShillitoMCChehabEFFinneranJJWardSRLieberRL. Mechanical feasibility of immediate mobilization of the brachioradialis muscle after tendon transfer. J Hand Surg Am. 2010, 35: 1473–8.
6.
FuchsSPWalbeehmETHoviusSE. Biomechanical evaluation of the pulvertaft versus the ‘wrap around' tendon suture technique. J Hand Surg Eur. 2011, 36: 461–6.
7.
GabuzdaGMLovalloJLNowakMD. Tensile strength of the end-weave flexor tendon repair. An in vitro biomechanical study. J Hand Surg Br. 1994, 19: 397–400.
8.
HahnJMInceoğluSWongworawatMD. Biomechanical comparison of Krackow locking stitch versus nonlocking loop stitch with varying number of throws. Am J Sports Med. 2014, 42: 3003–8.
9.
PulvertaftRG. Tendon grafts for flexor tendon injuries in the fingers and thumb; a study of technique and results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1956, 38: 175–94.
10.
SakaguchiKTachibanaYOdaH. Biomechanical properties of porcine flexor tendon fixation with varying throws and stitch methods. Am J Sports Med. 2012, 40: 1641–5.
11.
SchuindFGarcia-EliasMCooneyWPAnKN. Flexor tendon forces: in vivo measurements. J Hand Surg Am. 1992, 17: 291–8.
12.
TanakaTZhaoCEttemaAMZobitzMEAnKNAmadioPC. Tensile strength of a new suture for fixation of tendon grafts when using a weave technique. J Hand Surg Am. 2006, 31: 982–6.
13.
TsiampaVAIgnatiadisIPapaloisAGivissisPChristodoulouAFridénJ. Structural and mechanical integrity of tendon-to-tendon attachments used in upper limb tendon transfer surgery. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2012, 46: 262–6.
14.
WangBTangJB. Embedded cross-stitch suture: an alternative to current cross-stitch peripheral suture. J Hand Surg Br. 2003, 28: 471–4.
