The Lim/Tsai tendon repair technique has been modified clinically to achieve a 6-strand repair using a single looped suture with one extratendinous knot. We compared biomechanical performance of the original and modified methods using 20 porcine flexor digitorum profundus tendons. The ultimate tensile strength, load to 2 mm gap force, mode of failure, and time taken to repair each tendon were recorded during a single cycle loading test in 10 tendons with each repair method. We found that despite having the same number of core strands, the single looped suture modified Lim/Tsai technique possessed significantly greater ultimate tensile strength and load to 2 mm gap force. Also, less repair time was required. We conclude that the modified 6-strand repair using a single looped suture has better mechanical performance than the original method. The difference likely was due to the changes in locations of the knots and subsequent load distribution during tendon loading.
AokiMPruittDLKubotaHManskePR. Effect of suture knots on tensile strength of repaired canine flexor tendons. J Hand Surg Br. 1995, 20: 72–5.
2.
CaoYTangJB. A new variant of four-strand tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Eur. 2010, 35: 513–5.
3.
EdsfeldtSRempelDKursaKDiaoELattanzaL. In vivo flexor tendon forces generated during different rehabilitation exercises. J Hand Surg Eur. 2015, 40: 705–10.
4.
GanAWNeoPYHeMYamAKChongAKTaySC. A biomechanical comparison of 3 loop suture materials in a 6-strand flexor tendon repair technique. J Hand Surg Am. 2012, 37: 1830–4.
5.
HaddadRPeltzTBertolloNWalshWRNicklinS. Looped suture properties: Implications for multistranded flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Eur. 2015, 40: 234–8.
6.
HayRASWongYRLokeAMTaySC. Biomechanical investigation of uneven load bearing in six-strand Lim-Tsai flexor tendon repair using Fiberloop®. J Hand Surg Eur. 2017, 42: 457–61.
7.
HirparaKMSullivanPJO’SullivanME. The effects of freezing on the tensile properties of repaired porcine flexor tendon. J Hand Surg Am. 2008, 33: 353–8.
8.
HoffmannGLBuchlerUVogelinE. Clinical results of flexor tendon repair in zone II using a six-strand double loop technique compared with a two-strand technique. J Hand Surg Eur. 2008, 33: 418–23.
9.
LeppanenOVLinnanmakiLHavulinnaJGoranssonH. Suture configurations and biomechanical properties of flexor tendon repairs by 16 hand surgeons in Finland. J Hand Surg Eur. 2016, 41: 831–7.
10.
LimBTsaiT. The six-strand technique for flexor tendon repair. Atlas Hand Clin. 1996, 1: 65–76.
11.
KozonoNOkadaTTakeuchiNHanadaMShimotoTIwamotoY. Asymmetric six-strand core sutures enhance tendon fatigue strength and the optimal asymmetry. J Hand Surg Eur. 2016, 41: 802–8.
12.
MaoWFWuYFZhouYLTangJB. A study of the anatomy and repair strengths of porcine flexor and extensor tendons: are they appropriate experimental models?J Hand Surg Eur. 2011, 36: 663–9.
13.
MoriyaKYoshizuTMakiYTsubokawaNNarisawaHEndoN. Clinical outcomes of early active mobilization following flexor tendon repair using the six-strand technique: short- and long-term evaluations. J Hand Surg Eur. 2015, 40: 250–8.
14.
MoriyaKYoshizuTTsubokawaNNarisawaHHaraKMakiY. Clinical results of releasing the entire A2 pulley after flexor tendon repair in zone 2C. J Hand Surg Eur. 2016a, 41: 822–8.
15.
MoriyaKYoshizuTTsubokawaNNarisawaHHaraKMakiY. Outcomes of release of the entire A4 pulley after flexor tendon repairs in zone 2A followed by early active mobilization. J Hand Surg Eur. 2016b, 41: 400–5.
16.
PruittDLAokiMManskePR. Effect of suture knot location on tensile strength after flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 1996, 21: 969–73.
17.
SavageRTangJB. History and nomenclature of multistrand repairs in digital flexor tendons. J Hand Surg Am. 2016, 41: 291–3.
18.
SavvidouCTsaiTM. Clinical results of flexor tendon repair in zone II using a six strand double loop technique. J Hand Microsurg. 2015, 7: 25–9.
19.
StricklandJW. Development of flexor tendon surgery: twenty-five years of progress. J Hand Surg Am. 2000, 25: 214–35.
20.
TangJB. Clinical outcomes associated with flexor tendon repair. Hand Clin. 2005, 21: 199–210.
21.
TangJB. Indications, methods, postoperative motion and outcome evaluation of primary flexor tendon repairs in zone 2. J Hand Surg Eur. 2007, 32: 118–29.
22.
TangJB. Re: levels of experience of surgeons in clinical studies. J Hand Surg Eur. 2009, 34: 137–8.
23.
TangJB. Outcomes and evaluation of flexor tendon repair. Hand Clin. 2013, 29: 251–9.
24.
TangJBGiddinsG. Why and how to report surgeons’ levels of expertise. J Hand Surg Eur. 2016, 41: 365–6.
25.
WongYLokeMMat JaisILeeCTayS. Free body diagram analysis for investigation of flexor tendon repair. Int J Pharm Bio Sci. 2015, 4: 180–3.
26.
WuYFTangJB. Effects of tension across the tendon repair site on tendon gap and ultimate strength. J Hand Surg Am. 2012, 37: 906–12.
27.
WuYFTangJB. Recent developments in flexor tendon repair techniques and factors influencing strength of the tendon repair. J Hand Surg Eur. 2014, 39: 6–19.
28.
XieRGZhangSTangJBChenF. Biomechanical studies of 3 different 6-strand flexor tendon repair techniques. J Hand Surg Am. 2002, 27: 621–7.
29.
ZhouXLiXRQingJJiaXFChenJ. Outcomes of the six-strand M-Tang repair for zone 2 primary flexor tendon repair in 54 fingers. J Hand Surg Eur. 2017, 42: 462–8.
