Variables associated with recurrent Dupuytren’s disease, or a ‘diathesis’, have been investigated, but those associated with functional outcome and complications are less well studied. Outcomes 1 or 5 years after an aponeurotomy, fasciectomy or dermofasciectomy were assessed by patient interview and examination at five UK centres. A total of 432 procedures were studied. The reoperation rate did not differ at 1 year (p = 0.396, Chi-square test with Monte Carlo simulation), but was higher after aponeurotomy in the 5-year group (30%, versus 6% after fasciectomy and 0% after dermofasciectomy, p = 0.003, Chi square test with Monte Carlo simulation). Loss of function (DASH>15) did not differ between procedures at 5 years, even when reoperation and other variables were controlled. Diabetes, female gender and previous ipsilateral surgery were associated with poorer function in logistic regression analysis. The variables associated with poor function after treatments differ from diathesis variables. Aponeurotomy had lower complication rates than fasciectomy and dermofasciectomy. This may counterbalance the former’s higher recurrence rate and explain why aponeurotomy demonstrated similar long-term functional outcome compared with excisional surgery in this study.
AbeYRokkakuTOfuchiSTokunagaSTakahashiKMoriyaH.An objective method to evaluate the risk of recurrence and extension of Dupuytren’s disease. J Hand Surg Brit Eur. 2004, 29: 427–30.
2.
BallCPrattALNanchahalJ.Optimal functional outcome measures for assessing treatment for Dupuytren’s disease: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013, 14: 131.
3.
BeaudreuilJAllardAZerkakD, et al. Unite Rhumatologique des Affections de la Main (URAM) scale: development and validation of a tool to assess Dupuytren’s disease-specific disability. Arthrit Care Res. 2011, 63: 1448–55.
4.
BeaudreuilJOrcelPBardinT, et al. Re: RodriguesJNZhangWScammellBEDavisTRC. What patients want from the treatment of Dupuytren’s disease – is the Unite Rhumatologique des Affections de la Main (URAM) scale relevant?J Hand Surg Eur. 2014, 39: 673–5.
5.
BeckerGWDavisTR.The outcome of surgical treatments for primary Dupuytren’s disease – a systematic review. J Hand Surg Eur. 2010, 35: 623–6.
6.
BenjaminiYHochbergY.Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1995, 57: 289–300.
7.
CampbellDAKaySP.What is cold intolerance?J Hand Surg Brit Eur. 1998, 23: 3–5.
8.
CreanSMGerberRALe GraverandMPBoydDMCappelleriJC.The efficacy and safety of fasciectomy and fasciotomy for Dupuytren’s contracture in European patients: a structured review of published studies. J Hand Surg Eur. 2011, 36: 396–407.
9.
DegreefIVererfvePBDe SmetL.Effect of severity of Dupuytren contracture on disability. Scand J Plast Recons. 2009, 43: 41–2.
10.
DiasJJSinghHPUllahABhowalBThompsonJR.Patterns of recontracture after surgical correction of Dupuytren disease. J Hand Surg Am. 2013, 38: 1987–93.
11.
EngstrandCBorenLLiedbergGM.Evaluation of activity limitation and digital extension in Dupuytren’s contracture three months after fasciectomy and hand therapy interventions. J Hand Ther. 2009, 22: 21–6.
12.
FoucherGMedinaJNavarroR.Percutaneous needle aponeurotomy: complications and results. J Hand Surg Brit Eur. 2003, 28: 427–31.
13.
HardenRNBruehlSStanton-HicksMWilsonPR.Proposed new diagnostic criteria for complex regional pain syndrome. Pain Med. 2007, 8: 326–31.
14.
HindochaSStanleyJKWatsonSBayatA.Dupuytren’s diathesis revisited: evaluation of prognostic indicators for risk of disease recurrence. J Hand Surg Am. 2006, 31: 1626–34.
15.
HuestonJT. The Dupuytren’s diathesis. In: HuestonJT (Ed.) Dupuytren’s contracture. Edinburgh, E & S Livingstone, 1963: 51–63.
16.
JenkinsPJDuckworthADWattsACMcEachanJE.The outcome of carpal tunnel decompression in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012, 94: 811–4.
17.
Jerosch-HeroldCShepstoneLChojnowskiALarsonD.Severity of contracture and self-reported disability in patients with Dupuytren’s contracture referred for surgery. J Hand Ther. 2011, 24: 6–10.
18.
KennedyCBeatonDSolwaySMcConnell SBombardierC. The DASH and QuickDASH Outcome Measure User’s Manual, 3rd ed.Toronto, Institute for Work and Health, 2011.
19.
LarkinMEBarnieABraffettBH, et al. Musculoskeletal complications in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2014, 37: 1863–9.
20.
MisraAJainAGhazanfarRJohnstonTNanchahalJ.Predicting the outcome of surgery for the proximal interphalangeal joint in Dupuytren’s disease. J Hand Surg Am. 2007, 32: 240–5.
PallantJ.Part 4: Statistical techniques to explore relationships between variables: logistic regression. SPSS Survival Guide, 4th ed.Maidenhead, Open University Press, 2010.
23.
PandeyAUsmanKReddyHGutchMJainNQidwaiS.Prevalence of hand disorders in type 2 diabetes mellitus and its correlation with microvascular complications. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013, 3: 349–54.
24.
PessGMPessRMPessRA.Results of needle aponeurotomy for Dupuytren contracture in over 1,000 fingers. J Hand Surg Am. 2012, 37: 651–6.
25.
RodriguesJNZhangWScammellBEDavisTR.Dynamism in Dupuytren’s contractures. J Hand Surg Eur2015b; 40: 166–170.
26.
RodriguesJNZhangWScammellBEDavisTR.What patients want from the treatment of Dupuytren’s disease – is the Unite Rhumatologique des Affections de la Main (URAM) scale relevant?J Hand Surg Eur. 2015a; 40: 150–154.
27.
SauerlandSLeferingRBayer-SandowTBruserPNeugebauerEA.Fingers, hands or patients? The concept of independent observations. J Hand Surg Brit Eur. 2003, 28: 102–5.
28.
van RijssenALter LindenHWerkerPMN.Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial on treatment in Dupuytren’s disease: percutaneous needle fasciotomy versus limited fasciectomy. Plas Reconstr Surg. 2012, 129: 469–77.
29.
van RijssenALWerkerPM.Percutaneous needle fasciotomy for recurrent Dupuytren disease. J Hand Surg Am. 2012, 37: 1820–3.
30.
VittinghoffEMcCullochCE.Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2007, 165: 710–8.
31.
ZylukAJagielskiW.The effect of the severity of the Dupuytren’s contracture on the function of the hand before and after surgery. J Hand Surg Eur. 2007, 32: 326–9.
