We report the results of complete release of the entire A2 pulley after zone 2C flexor tendon repair followed by early postoperative active mobilization in seven fingers and their comparisons with 33 fingers with partial A2 pulley release. In seven fingers, release of the entire A2 pulley was necessary to allow free gliding of the repairs in five fingers and complete release of both the A2 and C1 pulleys was necessary in two. No bowstringing was clinically evident in any finger. Two fingers required tenolysis. Using Tang’s criteria, the function of two digits was ranked as excellent, four good and one fair; there was no failure. The functional return in these seven fingers was similar with that in 33 fingers with partial A2 pulley release; in these patients only one finger required tenolysis. Our results support the suggestion that release of the entire A2 pulley together with the adjacent C1 pulley does not clinically affect finger motion or cause tendon bowstringing, provided that the other pulleys are left intact.
BouyerMForliASemereAChedal BornuBJCorcellaDMoutetF. Recovery of rock climbing performance after surgical reconstruction of finger pulleys. J Hand Surg Eur. 2016, 41: 406–12.
2.
ElliotD. Primary flexor tendon repair – operative repair, pulley management and rehabilitation. J Hand Surg Br. 2002, 27: 507–13.
3.
ElliotDGiesenT. Primary flexor tendon surgery: the search for a perfect result. Hand Clin. 2013, 29: 191–206.
4.
HwangMDPettroneSTrumbleTE. Work of flexion related to different suture materials after flexor digitorum profundus and flexor digitorum superficialis tendon repair in zone II: a biomechanical study. J Hand Surg Am. 2009, 34: 700–4.
5.
LowrieAGLeesVC. Considerations in the surgical use of the flexor sheath and pulley system. J Hand Surg Eur. 2014, 39: 54–9.
6.
LuSCYangTHKuoLCJouIMSunYNSuFC. Effects of different extents of pulley release on tendon excursion efficiency and tendon moment arms. J Orthop Res. 2015, 33: 224–8.
7.
MitsionisGBastidasJAGrewalRPfaeffleHJFischerKJTomainoMM. Feasibility of partial A2 and A4 pulley excision: effect on finger flexor tendon biomechanics. J Hand Surg Am. 1999, 24: 310–4.
8.
MoriyaKYoshizuTMakiYTsubokawaNNarisawaHEndoN. Clinical outcomes of early active mobilization following flexor tendon repair using the six-strand technique: short- and long-term evaluations. J Hand Surg Eur. 2015, 40: 250–8.
9.
MoriyaKYoshizuTTsubokawaNNarisawaHHaraKMakiY. Outcomes of release of the entire A4 pulley after flexor tendon repairs in zone 2A followed by early active mobilization. J Hand Surg Eur. 2016, 41: 400–5.
10.
PaillardPJAmadioPCZhaoCZobitzMEAnKN. Pulley plasty versus resection of one slip of the flexor digitorum superficialis after repair of both flexor tendons in zone II: a biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002, 84: 2039–45.
11.
SaitoH. Flexor tendon repair in the digital sheath of the hand. Acta Med Biol. 1989, 37: 97–108.
12.
SavageR. The mechanical effect of partial resection of the digital fibrous flexor sheath. J Hand Surg Br. 1990, 15: 435–42.
13.
StricklandJWGlogovacSV. Digital function following flexor tendon repair in Zone II: a comparison of immobilization and controlled passive motion techniques. J Hand Surg Am. 1980, 5: 537–43.
14.
TanakaTAmadioPCZhaoCZobitzMEAnKN. The effect of partial A2 pulley excision on gliding resistance and pulley strength in vitro. J Hand Surg Am. 2004, 29: 877–83.
15.
TangJB. The double sheath system and tendon gliding in zone 2c. J Hand Surg Br. 1995, 20: 281–5.
16.
TangJB. Indications, methods, postoperative motion and outcome evaluation of primary flexor tendon repairs in zone 2. J Hand Surg Eur. 2007a, 32: 118–29.
17.
TangJB. Levels of experience of surgeons in clinical studies. J Hand Surg Eur. 2009a, 34: 137–8.
18.
TangJB. Outcomes and evaluation of flexor tendon repair. Hand Clin. 2013, 29: 251–9.
19.
TangJB. Release of the A4 pulley to facilitate zone II flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2014a, 39: 2300–7.
20.
TangJBShiD. Subdivision of flexor tendon “no man’s land” and different treatment methods in each sub-zone. A preliminary report. Chin Med J. 1992, 105: 60–8.
21.
TangJBCaoYWuYFWangGH. Effect of A2 pulley release on repaired tendon gliding resistance and rupture in a chicken model. J Hand Surg Am. 2009b, 34: 1080–7.
22.
TangJBChangJElliotDLalondeDHSandowMVögelinE. IFSSH Flexor Tendon Committee report 2014: from the IFSSH Flexor Tendon Committee (chairman: Jin Bo Tang). J Hand Surg Eur. 2014b, 39: 107–15.
23.
TangJBWangYHGuYTChenF. Effect of pulley integrity on excursions and work of flexion in healing flexor tendons. J Hand Surg Am. 2001, 26: 347–53.
24.
TangJBXieRGCaoYKeZSXuY. A2 pulley incision or one slip of the superficialis improves flexor tendon repairs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007b, 456: 121–7.
25.
TomainoMMitsionisGBasitidasJGrewalRPfaeffleJ. The effect of partial excision of the A2 and A4 pulleys on the biomechanics of finger flexion. J Hand Surg Br. 1998, 23: 50–2.
26.
TolertonSKLawsonRDTonkinMA. Management of flexor tendon injuries – part 2: current practice in Australia and guidelines for training young surgeons. Hand Surg. 2014, 19: 305–10.
27.
WuYFTangJB. Tendon healing, edema, and resistance to flexor tendon gliding: clinical implications. Hand Clin. 2013, 29: 167–78.
28.
WuYFTangJB. Recent developments in flexor tendon repair techniques and factors influencing strength of the tendon repair. J Hand Surg Eur. 2014, 39: 6–19.
29.
WuYFZhouYLTangJB. Relative contribution of tissue oedema and the presence of an A2 pulley to resistance to flexor tendon movement: an in vitro and in vivo study. J Hand Surg Eur. 2012, 37: 310–5.
30.
YoshizuT. Immediate mobilization following flexor tendon repair (in Japanese). J Musculoskelet Syst. 1996, 9: 881–90.
31.
ZhaoCAmadioPCZobitzMEAnKN. Resection of the flexor digitorum superficialis reduces gliding resistance after zone II flexor digitorum profundus repair in vitro. J Hand Surg Am. 2002, 27: 316–21.
