The aim of this study was to investigate health and disability in people with acute traumatic hand injury 10 years after the accident. A consecutive sample of patients from the Department of Hand Surgery was followed up by means of a postal questionnaire containing the instruments EQ-5D for assessment of health and DASH for assessment of disability. Questions were added about cold sensitivity, numbness and aesthetic problems. The 97 people with various acute hand injuries had greater problems with impairments of hand function than with limitations of activities and participation in daily life. Pain was more common than among the general Swedish population. Cold sensitivity was reported by 78% and was associated with both worse impairments and greater limitations on activity and participation. Despite problems with pain and cold sensitivity, they reported good health and a low degree of disability.
AtroshiIGummessonCAnderssonB. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire. Reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000, 71: 613–18.
2.
BurströmKJohannessonMRehnbergC. Deteriorating health status in Stockholm 1998–2002: Results from repeated population surveys using the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res. 2007, 16: 1547–53.
3.
Carlsson I. Cold sensitivity in injured and normal hands. Consequences for daily life. Doctoral dissertation. Lund, Lund University, 2010.
4.
CarlssonIEdbergA-KWann-HanssonC. Hand-injured patients’ experiences of cold sensitivity and the consequences and adaptation for daily life: A qualitative study. J Hand Ther. 2010, 23: 53–62.
5.
CollinsEDNovakCBMackinnonSE. Long-term follow-up evaluation of cold sensitivity following nerve injury. J Hand Surg Am. 1996, 21: 1078–85.
6.
DabernigJHartAMSchwabeggerAH. Evaluation outcome of replanted digits using the DASH score: Review of 38 patients. Int J Surgery. 2006, 4: 30–36.
7.
DASH Outcome Measure. Scoring the DASH outcome. Toronto, Institute for Work & Health, 2009. Available at: http://www.dash.iwh.on.ca/index.htm (2009-07-20).
8.
DixonDJohnstonMMcQueenM. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) can measure the impairment, activity limitations and participation restriction constructs from the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008, 9: 114–114.
9.
DolanP. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care. 1997, 35: 1095–108.
10.
DrummondASSampaioRFManciniMC. Linking the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. J Hand Ther. 2007, 20: 336–43.
11.
EuroQol Group. EQ-5D, a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. Rotterdam, EuroQol Group, 2009. Available at: http://www.euroqol.org/home.html (2009-07-20).
12.
GummessonCAtroshiIEkdahlC. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: Longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003, 4: 11–11.
13.
GustafssonMAhlströmG. Problems experienced during the first year of an acute traumatic hand injury – a prospective study. J Clin Nurs. 2004, 13: 986–95.
14.
GustafssonMAmilonAAhlströmG. Trauma-related distress and mood disorders in the early stage of an acute traumatic hand injury. J Hand Surg Br. 2003, 28: 332–8.
15.
HudakPLAmadioPCBombardierC. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand). Am J Ind Med. 1996, 29: 602–8.
16.
JanezicTFArnezZMŠolincM. Functional results of 46 thumb replantations and revascularisations. Microsurgery. 1997, 17: 264–67.
17.
JesterAHarthAGermannG. Measuring levels of upper-extremity disability in employed adults using the DASH questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am. 2005a, 30: 1074.e1–e10.
18.
JesterAHarthAWindG. Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire: Determining functional activity profiles in patients with upper extremity disorders. J Hand Surg Br. 2005b, 30: 23–28.
19.
Klein-WeigelPPavelkaMDabernigJ. Macro- and microcirculatory assessment of cold sensitivity after traumatic finger amputation and microsurgical replantation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007, 127: 355–60.
20.
MacDermidJCTottenhamV. Responsiveness of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) in evaluating change after hand therapy. J Hand Ther. 2004, 17: 18–23.
21.
NancarrowJDRaiSASterneGD. The natural history of cold intolerance in the hand. Injury. 1996, 27: 607–11.
NordlundAEkbergKKristensonM. EQ-5D in a general population survey – A description of the most commonly reported EQ-5D health states using the SF-36. Qual Life Res. 2005, 14: 1099–109.
24.
PolvsenBNylanderGNylanderE. Cold-induced vasospasm after digital replantation does not improve with time. A 12-year prospective study. J Hand Surg Br. 1995, 20: 237–39.
25.
RosbergHESteen CarlssonKDahlinLB. Prospective study of patients with injuries to the hand and forearm: Costs, function, and general health. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2005, 39: 360–69.
26.
SlobogeanGPNoonanVKO’BrienPJ. The reliability and validity of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, EuroQol-5D, Health Utilities Index and Short-Form 6D outcome instruments in patients with proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010, 19: 342–48.
27.
TrybusMLorkowskiJBrongelL. Causes and consequences of hand injuries. Am J Surg. 2006, 192: 52–57.
28.
VaksvikTHetlandMRøkkumM. Cold hypersensitivity 6 to 10 years after replantation of revascularisation of fingers: Consequences for work and leisure activities. J Hand Surg Br. 2009, 34: 12–17.
29.
van OosteromFJTEttemaAMMulderPGH. Impairment and disability after severe hand injuries with multiple phalangeal fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2007, 32: 91–5.
30.
WongJYPFungBKKChuMML. The Use of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire in rehabilitation after acute traumatic hand injuries. J Hand Ther. 2007, 20: 49–56.
31.
World Health Organization. ICF: International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2001. Available at: http://www.who.int/classifications (2009-07-20).
