Pennington advocated adding locking components to the Kessler-type repair to increase the repair strength, but did not actually test the repairs with this lock. Subsequent investigators have extensively cited that a Pennington lock is beneficial to the gain of repair strength. Thirty-three tendons were used to determine the exact strength differences between two grasping Kessler repairs and a Kessler repair with Pennington locks complemented with running peripheral suture. Two types of grasping repairs only had slightly lower resistance to gap formation compared with the repair with Pennington locks, and their ultimate strengths were not significantly different. We also compared the strength of four-strand Kessler repair with and without Pennington locks using 20 tendons, and found no difference in either gapping or ultimate strength. We conclude that a Pennington lock adds only a little to the capacity to gap resistance of a repair, but does not increase the ultimate strength.
BarrieKATomakSLCholewickiJWolfeSW. The role of multiple strands and locking sutures on gap formation of flexor tendon repairs during cyclical loading. J Hand Surg Am. 2000, 25: 714–20.
2.
BrockardtCJSullivanLGWatkinsBEWongworawatMD. Evaluation of simple and looped suture and new material for flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Eur. 2009, 34: 329–32.
3.
CaoYTangJB. A new variant of four-strand tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Eur. 2010, 35: 513–15.
4.
CaoYZhuBXieRGTangJB. Influence of core suture purchase length on strength of four-strand tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Am. 2006, 31: 107–12.
5.
GiesenTSirotakovaMCopseyAJElliotD. Flexor pollicis longus primary repair: Further experience with the Tang technique and controlled active mobilization. J Hand Surg Eur. 2009, 34: 758–61.
6.
HatanakaHKojimaTMiyagiTMizoguchiTUeshinY. Lengthening the locking loop repair for zone 2 flexor tendon laceration and partial lateral release of the tendon sheath. Hand Surg. 2009, 14: 125–9.
7.
HatanakaHManskePR. Effect of suture size on locking and grasping flexor tendon repair techniques. Clin Orthop. 2000, 375: 267–4.
8.
HatanakaHZhangJManskePR. An in vivo study of locking and grasping techniques using a passive mobilization protocol in experimental animals. J Hand Surg Am. 2000, 25: 260–9.
9.
HirparaKMSullivanPJO’SullivanME. The effects of freezing on the tensile properties of repaired porcine flexor tendon. J Hand Surg Am. 2008, 33: 353–8.
10.
Hirpara KM, Sullivan PJ, O’Neill B, O’Sullivan M. The optimum length of the Silfverskiöld circumferential cross stitch. J Hand Surg Eur. 2009, 34: 651–5.
11.
HotokezakaSManskePR. Differences between locking loops and grasping loops: Effects on 2-strand core suture. J Hand Surg Am. 1997, 22: 995–1003.
12.
KimJBde WitTHoviusSEMcGroutherDAWalbeehmET. What is the significance of tendon suture purchase?J Hand Surg Eur. 2009, 34: 497–502.
13.
LawrenceTMWoodruffMJAladinADavisTR. An assessment of the tensile properties and technical difficulties of two- and four-strand flexor tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Br. 2005, 30: 294–7.
14.
LeeSKGoldsteinRYZingmanATerranovaCNasserPHausmanMR. The effects of core suture purchase on the biomechanical characteristics of a multistrand locking flexor tendon repair: A cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Am. 2010, 35: 1165–71.
15.
MashadiZBAmisAA. The effect of locking loops on the strength of tendon repairs. J Hand Surg. 1991, 16: 35–9.
SilfverskiöldK. Acknowledgement to previous work – in reply. J Hand Surg Am. 1994, 19: 1055–6.
18.
SmithAMForderJAAnnapureddySRReddyKSAmisAA. The porcine forelimb as a model for human flexor tendon surgery. J Hand Surg Br. 2005, 30: 307–9.
19.
TanJMingLJiaZJTangJB. Repairs of partial oblique tendon injuries: A biomechanical evaluation. J Hand Surg Br. 2004, 29: 381–5.
20.
TanJTangJB. Locking repairs for obliquely cut tendons: Effects of suture purchase and directions of locking circles. J Hand Surg Am. 2004, 29: 891–7.
21.
TanJWangBTanBXuYTangJB. Changes in tendon strength after partial cut and effects of running peripheral sutures. J Hand Surg Br. 2003, 28: 478–82.
22.
TanakaTAmadioPCZhaoCZobitzMEYangCAnKN. Gliding characteristics and gap formation for locking and grasping tendon repairs: A biomechanical study in a human cadaver model. J Hand Surg Am. 2004, 29: 6–14.
23.
TangJB. Clinical outcomes associated with flexor tendon repair. Hand Clin. 2005, 21: 199–210.
24.
TangJB. Indications, methods, postoperative motion and outcome evaluation of primary flexor tendon repairs in Zone 2. J Hand Surg Eur. 2007, 32: 118–29.
25.
TangJBTanJXuY. Lengthening and locking: Two ways to improve repair strength of obliquely lacerated tendons. J Hand Surg Am. 2003, 28: 832–7.
26.
TangJBZhangYCaoYXieRG. Core suture purchase affects strength of tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Am. 2005, 30: 1262–6.
27.
TarasJSRaphaelJSMarczykSCBauerleWB. Evaluation of suture caliber in flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2001, 26: 1100–4.
28.
ThurmanRTTrumbleTEHanelDPTencerAFKiserPK. Two-, four-, and six-strand zone II flexor tendon repairs: An in situ biomechanical comparison using a cadaver model. J Hand Surg Am. 1998, 23: 261–5.
29.
TrumbleTEVedderNBSeilerJG3rdHanelDPDiaoEPettroneS. Zone-II flexor tendon repair: A randomized prospective trial of active place-and-hold therapy compared with passive motion therapy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010, 92: 1381–9.
30.
ViglerMPaltiRGoldsteinRPatelVPNasserPLeeSK. Biomechanical study of cross-locked cruciate versus Strickland flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2008, 33: 1826–33.
31.
WadaAKubotaHHatanakaHHotokezakaSMiuraHIwamotoY. The mechanical properties of locking and grasping suture loop configurations in four-strand core suture techniques. J Hand Surg Br. 2000, 25: 548–51.
32.
WaitayawinyuTMartineauPALuriaSHanelDPTrumbleTE. Comparative biomechanic study of flexor tendon repair using FiberWire. J Hand Surg Am. 2008, 33: 701–8.
33.
WalbeehmETDe WitTHoviusSEMcGroutherDA. Influence of core suture geometry on tendon deformation and gap formation in porcine flexor tendons. J Hand Surg Eur. 2009, 34: 190–5.
34.
XieRGTangJB. Investigation of locking configurations for tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2005, 30: 461–5.
35.
XieRGXueHGGuJHTanJTangJB. Effects of locking area on strength of 2- and 4-strand locking tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Am. 2005, 30: 455–60.
