The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic test accuracy of X-ray arthrography in the detection of TFCC tear. Both published and unpublished databases were searched from their inception to August 2010. All studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy of X-ray arthrography (index test) to arthroscopy (reference standard) for patients with suspected TFCC tears were included in this review. Twelve studies assessing 430 patients (430 wrists) satisfied the eligibility criteria and were included. X-ray arthrography presented with a pooled sensitivity of 76.2% and specificity of 92.5% for the detection of complete TFCC tear. The triple-compartment injection X-ray arthrography was superior to the single-compartment injection technique. To conclude, the diagnostic test accuracy of X-ray arthrography is limited. Neither the single- nor the triple-compartment injection arthrography method is acceptable, given their reported low sensitivities. Further evaluation of the diagnostic test accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Arthrography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging is therefore warranted.
BelsoleRJQuinnSFGreeneTLBeattyMERaybackJM. Digital subtraction arthrography of the wrist. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990, 72: 847–51.
2.
BlandM. Introduction to medical statistics, 3rd Edn.Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006, p.39.
3.
CerofoliniELuchettiRPederziniL. MR evaluation of triangular fibrocartilage complex tears in the wrist: Comparison with arthrography and arthroscopy. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1990, 14: 963–7.
4.
ChungKCZimmermanNBTravisMT. Wrist arthrography versus arthroscopy: A comparative study of 150 cases. J Hand Surg Am. 1996, 21: 591–4.
5.
CooneyWP. Evaluation of chronic wrist pain by arthrography, arthroscopy, and arthrotomy. J Hand Surg Am. 1993, 18: 815–22.
6.
DeeksJJ. Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. In: EggerMDavey SmithGAltmanDG (eds) Systematic reviews in healthcare: Meta-analysis in context. London, BMJ Publishing Groups, 2001, p.248–4.
GrechenigWPeichaGFellingerMSeibertF-JPreidlerKW. Wrist arthrography after acute trauma to the distal radius: Diagnostic accuracy, technique, and sources of diagnostic errors. Invest Radiol. 1998, 33: 273–8.
9.
HaageH. Die Arthrographie des Handgelenkes. I. Das normale Gelenk und seine Variationen. Radiologe. 1966, 6: 50–7.
10.
HankerGJ. Diagnostic and operative arthroscopy of the wrist. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991, 263: 165–74.
11.
Jui-TienSYao-TungHHung-MaanLChuan-MingTMing-ChunC. Chronic triangular fibrocartilage complex tears with distal radioulnar joint instability: A new method of triangular fibrocartilage complex reconstruction. J Orthop Surg. 2000, 8: 1–8.
12.
KazakosKJXarchasKCZiogasMKKehagiasDJVerettasDA. Diagnostic value of conventional arthrography in investigating post-traumatic ulnar wrist pain: Are MRI and MR arthrography always necessary?. Med Sci Monit. 2008, 14: CS37–40.
13.
KirschenbaumDSielerSSolonickDLoebDMCodyRP. Arthrography of the wrist. Assessment of the integrity of the ligaments in young asymptomatic adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995, 77: 1207–9.
14.
KovanlikayaICamliDCakmakciH. Diagnostic value of MR arthrography in detection of intrinsic carpal ligament lesions: Use of cine-MR arthrography as a new approach. Eur Radiol. 1997, 7: 1441–5.
15.
LevinsohnEMRosenIDPalmerAK. Wrist arthrography: Value of the three-compartment injection method. Radiology. 1991, 179: 231–9.
16.
LittenbergBMosesLE. Estimating diagnostic accuracy from multiple conflicting reports: A new analytic method. Med Decis Making. 1993, 13: 313–21.
17.
MeloneCPJrTarasJS. Distal ulna resection, extensor carpi ulnaris tenodesis, and dorsal synovectomy for the rheumatoid wrist. Hand Clin. 1991, 7: 335–43.
18.
MikicZD. Age changes in the triangular fibrocartilage of the wrist joint. J Anat. 1978, 126: 367–84.
19.
MikicZD. Arthrography of the wrist joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984, 66: 371–8.
20.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJAltmanDG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009, 62: 1006–12.
21.
MorleyJBidwellJBransby-ZacharyM. A comparison of the findings of wrist arthroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging in the investigation of wrist pain. J Hand Surg Br. 2001, 26: 544–6.
PalmerAKWernerFW. The triangular fibrocartilage complex of the wrist–anatomy and function. J Hand Surg Am. 1981, 6: 153–62.
24.
PederziniLLuchettiRSoragniO. Evaluation of the triangular fibrocartilage complex tears by arthroscopy, arthrography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Arthroscopy. 1992, 8: 191–7.
25.
PotterHGAsnis-ErnbergLWeilandAJHotchkissRNPetersonMGMcCormackRRJr. The utility of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the triangular fibrocartilage complex of the wrist. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997, 79: 1675–84.
26.
RothJHHaddadRG. Radiocarpal arthroscopy and arthrography in the diagnosis of ulnar wrist pain. Arthroscopy. 1986, 2: 234–43.
27.
SchersTJVan HeusdenHA. Evaluation of chronic wrist pain. Arthroscopy superior to arthrography: Comparison in 39 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1995, 66: 540–2.
28.
ScheckRJRomagnoloAHiernerRPflugerTWilhelmKHahnK. The carpal ligaments in MR arthrography of the wrist: correlation with standard MRI and wrist arthrography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999, 9: 468–74.
29.
SchweitzerMEBrahmeSKHodlerJ. Chronic wrist pain: Spin-echo and short tau inversion recovery MR imaging and conventional and MR arthrography. Radiology. 1992, 182: 205–11.
ShionoyaKNakamuraRImaedaTMakinoN. Arthrography is superior to magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing injuries of the triangular fibrocartilage. J Hand Surg Br. 1998, 23: 402–5.
32.
Vanden EyndeSDe SmetLFabryG. Diagnostic value of arthrography and arthroscopy of the radiocarpal joint. Arthroscopy. 1994, 10: 50–3.
33.
WatanabeASouzaFVezeridisPSBlazarPYoshiokaH. Ulnar-sided wrist pain. II. Clinical imaging and treatment. Skeletal Radiol. 2010, 39: 837–57.
34.
WilsonAJGilulaLAMannFA. Unidirectional joint communications in wrist arthrography: An evaluation of 250 cases. Am J Roentgenol. 1991, 157: 105–9.
35.
WhitingPRutjesAWDinnesJReitsmaJBossuytPMKleijnenJ. Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies. Health Technol Assess. 2004, 8: 1–234.
36.
WhitingPFWeswoodMERutjesAWReitsmaJBBossuytPNKleijnenJ. Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006, 6: 9.
