GuyattGHSackettDLSinclairJC. Users' guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA1995;274: 1800–04.
ShoemakerWCAppelPLKramHB. Prospective trial of supranormal values of survivors as therapeutic goals in high-risk surgical patients. Chest1988;94: 1176–86.
5.
HeylandDKCookDJKingD. Maximizing oxygen delivery in critically ill patients: a methodologic appraisal of the evidence. Crit Care Med1996;24: 517–24.
6.
KernJWShoemakerWC. Meta-analysis of hemodynamic optimization in high-risk patients. Crit Care Med2002;30: 1686–92.
7.
LeesNHamiltonMRhodesA. Clinical review: Goal-directed therapy in high risk surgical patients. Crit Care2009;13: 231.
8.
OteroRMNguyenHBHuangDT. Early goal-directed therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock revisited: concepts, controversies, and contemporary findings. Chest2006;130: 1579–95.
9.
ZieglerEJFisherCJJr.SprungCL. Treatment of gram-negative bacteremia and septic shock with HA-1A human monoclonal antibody against endotoxin. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The HA-1A Sepsis Study Group. N Engl J Med1991;324: 429–36.
10.
McCloskeyRVStraubeRCSandersC. Treatment of septic shock with human monoclonal antibody HA-1A. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. CHESS Trial Study Group. Ann Int Med1994;121: 1–5.
11.
van den BergheGWoutersPWeekersF. Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients. N Engl J Med2001;345: 1359–67.
12.
WienerRSWienerDCLarsonRJ. Benefits and risks of tight glucose control in critically ill adults: a meta-analysis. JAMA2008;300: 933–44.
13.
BernardGRVincentJLLaterrePF. Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis. N Engl J of Med2001;344: 699–709.
14.
AnnaneDBellissantEBollaertPE. Corticosteroids in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults: a systematic review. JAMA2009;301: 2362–75.
15.
ZandstraDFPetrosAJTaylorN. Withholding selective decontamination of the digestive tract from critically ill patients must now surely be ethically questionable given the vast evidence base. Crit Care2010;14: 443.
16.
KopteridesPSiemposIIArmaganidisA. Prone positioning in hypoxemic respiratory failure: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Crit Care2009;24: 89–100.
17.
DellingerRPLevyMMCarletJM. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med2008;36: 296–327.
18.
FinferS. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: robust evaluation and high-quality primary research is still needed. Crit Care Med2010;38: 683–84.
19.
MachadoFRFreitasFG. Controversies of surviving sepsis campaign bundles: should we use them?Shock2008;30 Suppl 1:34–40.
20.
BradyARGibbsJSGreenhalghRM. Perioperative beta-blockade (POBBLE) for patients undergoing infrarenal vascular surgery: results of a randomized double-blind controlled trial. J Vasc Surg2005;41: 602–09.
21.
PeekGJMugfordMTiruvoipatiR. Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet2009;374: 1351–63.
22.
AdhikariNKBurnsKEFriedrichJO. Effect of nitric oxide on oxygenation and mortality in acute lung injury: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ2007;334: 779.
23.
HillmanKChenJCretikosM. Introduction of the medical emergency team (MET) system: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet2005;365: 2091–97.
24.
FinferSBellomoRBoyceN. A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med2004;350: 2247–56.
25.
VincentJL. Logistics of large international trials: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Crit Care Med2009;37: S75–S79.
26.
TonelliMR. The limits of evidence-based medicine. Resp Care2001;46: 1435–40.
27.
BellomoRWarrillowSJReadeMC. Why we should be wary of single-center trials. Crit Care Med2009;37: 3114–19.
28.
BormGFLemmersOFransenJDondersR. The evidence provided by a single trial is less reliable than its statistical analysis suggests. J Clin Epidemiol2009;62: 711–15.
29.
MooreRADerrySMcQuayHJ. Fraud or flawed: adverse impact of fabricated or poor quality research. Anaesthesia2010;65: 327–30.
30.
SchulzKFAltmanDGMoherD. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ2010;340: c332.
31.
HebertPCWellsGBlajchmanMA. A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in critical care. Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care Investigators, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. N Engl J Med1999;340: 409–17.
32.
The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med2000;342: 1301–08.
33.
LexchinJBeroLADjulbegovicBClarkO. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ2003;326: 1167–70.
34.
ConcatoJShahNHorwitzRI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med2000;342: 1887–92.
FergussonDAHebertPCMazerCD. A comparison of aprotinin and lysine analogues in high-risk cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med2008;358: 2319–31.
37.
SmithGCPellJP. Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Int J Prosthodontics2006;19: 126–28.