Department of Health. A Framework for Action.DH, Her Majesty's Stationery Office. London; 2007.
2.
Department of Health. Our NHS, our Future.Her Majesty's Stationery Office. London; 2007.
3.
Department of Health. Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS.Her Majesty's Stationery Office. London; 2010.
4.
SoljakM. volumes of procedures and outcomes of treatment. BMJ2002;325: 787–88.
5.
KilleenSDO'SullivanMJCoffeyJC. Provider volume and outcomes for oncological procedures. Br J Surg2005;92: 389–402.
6.
ChowdhuryMMDagashHPeirroA. A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome. Br J Surg2007;94: 145–61.
7.
ForshawMJGossageJAStephensJ. Centralisation of oesophagogastric cancer services: can specialist units deliver?Ann R Coll Surg Engl2006;88: 566–70.
8.
HannanELO'DonnellJFKilburnH. Investigation of the relationship between volume and mortality for surgical procedures performed in New York state hospitals. JAMA1989;262: 503–10.
9.
MorganMAGoodsonMEscofetX. Workload and resource implications of upper gastrointestinal cancer surgical centralisation in South East Wales. Ann R Coll Surg Engl2008;90: 467–71.
10.
ShowstackJARosenfeldKGarnickDW. Association of volume with outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Scheduled vs nonscheduled operations. JAMA1987;257: 785–89.
11.
AldeaGSMokadamNAMelfordR. Changing volumes, risk profiles, and outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary interventions. Ann Thorac Surg2009;87: 1828–38.
12.
KarthikesalingamAHinchliffeRJPolonieckiJD. Centralization harnessing volume-outcome relationships in vascular surgery and aortic aneurysm care should not focus solely on threshold operative caseload. Vasc Endovascular Surg2010;44: 556–59.
13.
BallardDJOgolaGFlemingNS. Impact of a standardised heart failure order set on mortality, readmission and quality and costs of care. Int J Qual Health Care2010;22: 437–44.
14.
PearsonVGShannFBarryP. Should paediatric intensive care be centralised? Trent versus Victoria. Lancet1997;349: 1213–17.
15.
PearsonGBarryPTimminsC. Changes in the profile of paediatric intensive care associated with centralisation. Intensive Care Med2001;27: 1670–73.
16.
KahnJMGossCHHeagertyPJ. Hospital volumes and the outcomes of mechanical ventilation. NEJM2006;355: 41–50.
17.
WunschHAngusDHarrisonDA. Variation in critical care services across North America and Western Europe. Crit Care Med2008;36: 2787–e8.
18.
PeekGMugfordMTiruvoipatiT. for the CESAR trial collaboration. Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet2009;374: 1351–63.
19.
SuarezJI. Outcome in neurocritical care: advances in monitoring and treatment and effect of a specialized neurocritical care team. Crit Care Med2006;34: S232–S238.
20.
MirskiMAChangCWCowanR. Impact of a neuroscience intensive care unit on neurosurgical patient outcomes and cost of care: evidence-based support for an intensivist-directed specialty ICU model of care. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol2001;13: 83–92.
21.
Neurocritical Care Stakeholder Group. Neurocritical care capacity and demand: A report from the neurocritical care stakeholder group.Neuroanaesthesia Society of Great Britain and Ireland. London;2006.
22.
NCEPOD. An Acute Problem: National Confidential Enquiry into patient Outcome and Death. NCEPOD, London; 2006.
23.
PriceSJSuttnerNAspoasAR. Have ATLS and National Transfer Guidelines improved the quality of resuscitation and transfer of head-injured patients? A prospective survey from a Regional Neurosurgical Unit. Injury2003;34: 834–38.
24.
AndrewsPDPiperIRDeardenNM. Secondary insults during intrahospital transport of head-injured patients. Lancet1990;335: 327–30.
25.
NichollJWestJGoodacreS. The relationship between distance to hospital and patient mortality in emergencies: an observational study. Emerg Med J2007;24: 665–68.
26.
BelwayDDodekPMKeenanSP. The role of transport intervals in outcomes for critically ill patients who are transferred to referral centers. J Crit Care2006;21: 8–17.
27.
RamnarayanPThiruKParslowRC. Effect of specialist retrieval teams on outcomes in children admitted to paediatric intensive care units in England and Wales: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet2010;376: 698–704.
28.
BellinganGOlivierTBatsonSWebbA. Comparison of a specialist retrieval team with current United Kingdom practice for the transport of critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med2000;26: 740–44.
29.
ClarkeEBCurtisJRLuceJM. Quality indicators for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med2003;31: 2255–62.
De MariaERicciSCapelliS. Feasibility of transradial approach in a hub and spoke cath lab network. Minerva Cardioangiol2010;58: 11–15.
32.
MorganKPLeahyMGButtsJNBeattKJ. The cost-effectiveness of primary angioplasty compared to thrombolysis in the real world: one year results from West London. Eurointervention2010;6: 596–603.
33.
NobilioLFortunaDVizioliM. Impact of regionalisation of cardiac surgery in Emilia-Romagna, Italy. J Epidemiol Community Health2004;58: 97–102.
34.
NobilioLUgoliniC. Selective referrals in a ‘hub and spoke’ institutional setting: the case of coronary angioplasty procedures. Health Policy2003;63: 95–107.