Over the past few years, digitalisation has led to the development of new forms of Holocaust memory, with advances in digital technology reshaping and introducing alternative ways of remembering, understanding and representing the Holocaust. The purpose of this study is to examine how three Holocaust survivors – Lily Ebert (100), Gidon Lev (88) and Tova Friedman (85) – share their firsthand experiences on TikTok by segmenting traumatic memories using the platforms’ audio–visual aesthetic and adapting their testimonies for the attention spans of young users. Based on 1-year content production and detailed analysis of 84 videos across the three profiles, a mixed-methods approach was applied to identify how each survivor interacts with their ‘fans’ using a unique communication style and with distinct goals. The results of the multimodal analysis show that the three survivors are engaged in meaningful acts of playful online activism on the memory of the Holocaust by bringing testimony and daily life together, in order to protect historical facts and combat antisemitism and Holocaust distortion.
AbbasLFahmySSAyadS, et al. (2022) TikTok intifada: analyzing social media activism among youth. Online Media and Global Communication1(2): 287–314.
2.
AbidinC (2021) Mapping internet celebrity on TikTok: exploring attention economies and visibility labours. Cultural Science Journal12(1): 77–103.
3.
AdriaansenRJ (2022) Historical consciousness: analogies and historical user-generated history lessons on TikTok. In: CarreteroMCantabranaMParelladaC (eds) History Education in the Digital Age. Cham: Springer, pp. 43–62.
4.
AlbadriHA (2023) The role and impact of social media influencers. Information Sciences Letters12(8): 2685–2696.
5.
AlperBA (2020) What Americans Know about the Holocaust. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
6.
ArielyG (2022) Historical analogies under dispute: reactions of Israeli Jews to analogies between the Holocaust and the plight of African asylum seekers in Israel. Memory Studies15(5): 1011–1026.
AskaniusT (2019) Video activism as technology, text, testimony – or practices? In: StephansenHTreréE (eds) Citizen Media and Practice. London: Routledge, pp. 136–151.
9.
AssmannA (2014) Transnational memories. European Review22(4): 546–556.
10.
AssmannA (2017) Transnational memory and the construction of history through mass media. In: BondLCrapsSVermeulenP (eds) Memory Unbound: Tracing the Dynamics of Memory Studies. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books, pp. 65–82.
11.
AzadACarlssonJ (2024) ‘When you told us what had happened to you, I started to shiver’ – what children and teenagers immediately express and comprehend after listening to testimonies of Holocaust survivors. Holocaust Studies30(1): 66–83.
12.
Baruch-StierO (2015) Holocaust Icons: Symbolizing the Shoah in History and Memory. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
13.
BirknerTDonkA (2020) Collective memory and social media: fostering a new historical consciousness in the digital age?Memory Studies13(4): 367–383.
14.
BolterDGrusinR (2000) Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
15.
BoswellMRowlandA (2023) Virtual Holocaust Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
BruceD (1985) The how and why of ecological memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology General114(1): 78–90.
17.
BucherTHelmondA (2018) The affordances of social media platforms. In: BurgessJMarwickAPoellT (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Social Media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 233–253.
18.
Castillo-EsparciaACaro-CastañoLAlmansa-MartínezA (2023) Evolution of digital activism on social media: opportunities and challenges. Profesional de la Información32(3): 1–16.
19.
CerviLDivonT (2023) Playful activism: memetic performances of Palestinian resistance in TikTok #Challenges. Social Media + Society9(1): 1–13.
20.
CerviLMarín-LladóC (2022) Freepalestine on TikTok: from performative activism to (meaningful) playful activism. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication15(4): 414–434.
CommaneGPottonR (2019) Instagram and Auschwitz: a critical assessment of the impact social media has on Holocaust representation. Holocaust Studies25(1–2): 158–181.
23.
CreswellJW (2014) Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
DalzielI (2016) ‘Romantic Auschwitz’: examples and perceptions of contemporary visitor photography at the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum. Holocaust Studies22(2–3): 185–207.
26.
DalzielI (2021) Becoming the ‘Holocaust police’? The Auschwitz-Birkenau state museum’s authority on social media. In: WaldenVG (ed.) Digital Holocaust Memory, Education and Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 179–212.
27.
DeanCJ (2019) The Moral Witness. Trials and Testimony after Genocide. New York: Cornell University Press.
DivonTEbbrecht-HartmannT (2022) #JewishTikTok. The JewToks’ fight against antisemitism. In: BoffoneT (ed.) TikTok Cultures in the United States. London: Routledge, pp. 47–58.
31.
DivonTEbbrecht-HartmannT (2023) Performing death and trauma? Participatory mem(e)ory and the Holocaust in Tiktok #POVChallenges. In: AoIR selected papers of internet research. DOI: 10.5210/spir.v2022i0.12995.
32.
DuYLiCGuoR, et al. (2020) PP-OCR: a practical ultra lightweight OCR system. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.09941. Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2009.09941.pdf (accessed 16 March 2023).
33.
Ebbrecht-HartmannT (2021) Commemorating from a distance: the digital transformation of Holocaust memory in times of COVID-19. Media, Culture & Society43(6): 1095–1112.
34.
Ebbrecht-HartmannT (2022) Foreword. In: MancaSHaakeSRehmM and et al. (eds) Addressing Holocaust Distortion on Social Media. Guidelines and Recommendations for Memorials and Museums (IHRA Project Report), pp. 11–13.
35.
Ebbrecht-HartmannTDivonT (2022) Serious TikTok: can you learn about the Holocaust in 60 seconds?MediArXiv. DOI: 10.33767/osf.io/nv6t2.
36.
Ebbrecht-HartmannTStiassnyNSchmidtF (2022) The Auschwitz tattoo in visual memory. Mapping multilayered relations of a migrating image. Research in Film and History. Video Essays1–19. Available at: https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/19713; https://film-history.org/node/1129 (accessed 16 March 2023).
37.
EdwardsDGelmsB (2018) The rhetorics of platforms: definitions, approaches, futures. Present Tense6(3): 2–10.
FridmanO (2022) Memory Activism and Digital Practices after Conflict. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
42.
FroshP (2018) The mouse, the screen and the Holocaust witness: interface aesthetics and moral response. New Media & Society20(1): 351–368.
43.
GibsonJ (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
44.
GlaserBStraussA (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Routledge.
45.
González-AguilarJMMakhortykhM (2022) Laughing to forget or to remember? Anne Frank memes and mediatization of Holocaust memory. Media, Culture & Society44(7): 1307–1329.
GrayJE (2021) The geopolitics of ‘platforms’: the TikTok challenge. Internet Policy Review10(2): 1–26.
48.
GrayM (2014) Contemporary Debates in Holocaust Education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
49.
GreenspanH (2010) On Listening to Holocaust Survivors: Beyond Testimony. New York: Paragon House.
50.
GutmanYWüstenbergJ (2022) Challenging the meaning of the past from below: a typology for comparative research on memory activists. Memory Studies15(5): 1070–1086.
51.
GutmanYWüstenbergJ (2023) The Routledge Handbook of Memory Activism. New York: Routledge.
52.
HaseVBoczekKScharkowM (2023) Adapting to affordances and audiences? A cross-platform, multi-modal analysis of the platformization of news on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter. Digital Journalism11(8): 1499–1520.
53.
HauteaSParksPTakahashiB, et al. (2021) Showing they care (or don’t): affective publics and ambivalent climate activism on TikTok. Social Media + Society7(2): 1–14.
54.
HenigLEbbrecht-HartmannT (2022) Witnessing Eva Stories: media witnessing and self-inscription in social media memory. New Media & Society24(1): 202–226.
55.
HepworthA (2019) From survivor to fourth-generation memory: literal and discursive sites of memory in post-dictatorship Germany and Spain. Journal of Contemporary History54(1): 139–162.
56.
HirschM (2001) Surviving images. Holocaust photographs and the work of postmemory. The Yale Journal of Criticism14(1): 5–37.
57.
HirschM (2012) The Generation of Postmemory: Writing and Visual Culture after the Holocaust. New York: Columbia University Press.
58.
HogervorstS (2020) The era of the user. Testimonies in the digital age. Rethinking History24(2): 169–183.
59.
HollowayS (2023) Survivor testimony in holocaust education. Agora58(2): 30–33.
HoskinsA (2018) The restless past: an introduction to digital memory and media. In: HoskinsA (ed.) Digital Memory Studies: Media Pasts in Transition. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 1–24.
62.
HübscherMvon MeringS (2022) Antisemitism on Social Media. London: Routledge.
63.
JenkinsH (2006) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
64.
JenkinsHFordSGreenJ (2013) Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture. New York: New York University Press.
65.
JohnsANBrownLSCromerLD (2022) Examining intergenerational transmission of Holocaust trauma as it relates to Jewish identity, communication type, and mental well-being. Journal of Traumatic Stress35(5): 1497–1507.
66.
KansteinerW (2018) The Holocaust in the 21st century: digital anxiety, transnational cosmopolitanism, and never again genocide without memory. In: HoskinsA (ed.) Digital Memory Studies: Media Pasts in Transition. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 110–140.
67.
KleinM (2022) ‘My Daughter Éva’: a story of translation, paratext and digital communication. History & Memory34(1): 133–158.
68.
KlikE (2020) Customizing memory: number tattoos in contemporary Israeli memory work. Memory Studies13(4): 649–661.
69.
KonkkaO (2023) ‘Millions of Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians, Jews, People of All Ethnicities’: teaching and remembering the Holocaust in Russian schools. Holocaust Studies29(1): 39–65.
70.
KressG (2000) Multimodality: challenges to thinking about language. TESOL Quarterly34(2): 337–340.
71.
KressGVan LeeuwenT (2001) Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Edward Arnold.
72.
LawsonT (2017) Britain’s promise to forget: some historiographical reflections on what do students know and understand about the Holocaust?Holocaust Studies23(3): 345–363.
73.
LeeJJLeeJ (2023) #StopAsianHate on TikTok: Asian/American women’s space-making for spearheading counter-narratives and forming an ad hoc Asian community. Social Media + Society9(1): 1–11.
74.
LevyDSznaiderN (2006) The Holocaust and Memory in the Global Age. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
75.
LewisT (2021) Experiment with playful protest. In: HartR (ed.) Fixing American Politics. Solutions for the Media Age. New York: Routledge, pp. 37–45.
76.
MancaS (2022) Digital Holocaust memory on social media: how Italian Holocaust museums and memorials use digital ecosystems for educational and remembrance practice. International Journal of Heritage Studies28(10): 1152–1179.
77.
MancaSPassarelliM (2023) Social media as lieux for the convergence of collective trajectories of Holocaust memory. A study of online users in Germany and Italy. Heritage6(9): 6377–6396.
78.
MancaSRaffaghelliJ (2023) An examination of learning ecologies associated with the Holocaust: the role of social media. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning39(6): 1874–1887.
79.
MancaSPassarelliMRehmM (2022a) Exploring tensions in Holocaust museums’ modes of commemoration and interaction on social media. Technology in Society68: 101889.
MarcusASMaorRMcGregorIM, et al. (2022) Holocaust education in transition from live to virtual survivor testimony: pedagogical and ethical dilemmas. Holocaust Studies28(3): 279–301.
82.
MarrisonK (2021) Virtually part of the family: the last goodbye and digital Holocaust witnessing. In: WaldenVG (ed.) Digital Holocaust Memory, Education and Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 15–30.
83.
McCaugheyMAyersMD (2003) Cyberactivism – Online Activism in Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.
84.
MenyhértA (2017) Digital trauma processing in social media groups: transgenerational Holocaust trauma on Facebook. Hungarian Historical Review6(2): 355–376.
85.
MurphyCA (2023) Instagram stories and historical re-enactment in social media memory: Eva Stories and Ich bin Sophie Scholl. In: MarkováAKuznetcovaM (eds) Memory of Central and Eastern Europe. Past Traumas, Present Challenges, Future Horizons. Prague: Charles University, Karolinum Press, pp. 48–72.
86.
NameyEGuestGThairuL, et al. (2008) Data reduction techniques for large qualitative data sets. In: GuestGMacQueenKM (eds) Handbook for Team-Based Qualitative Research. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, pp. 137–163.
87.
NeigerMMeyersOBen-DavidA (2023) Tweeting the Holocaust: social media discourse between reverence, exploitation, and simulacra. Journal of Communication73(3): 222–234.
88.
NesfieldVL (2015) Keeping Holocaust education relevant in a changing landscape: seventy years on. Research in Education94(1): 44–54.
89.
NieborgDBPoellT (2018) The platformization of cultural production: theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society20(11): 4275–4292.
90.
Novis-DeutschNSLedermanSAdamsT, et al. (2023) Sites of Tension: Shifts in Holocaust Memory in Relation to Antisemitism and Political Contestation in Europe. Haifa, Israel: The Weiss-Livnat International Center for Holocaust Research and Education.
91.
PakierMStråthB (2010) A European Memory? Contested Histories and Politics of Remembrance. New York: Berghahn.
92.
PapacharissiZ (2016) Affective publics and structures of storytelling: sentiment, events and mediality. Information, Communication & Society19(3): 307–324.
93.
PellegrinoAParkerJ (2022) Teaching and Learning through the Holocaust. Thinking about the unthinkable. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
94.
PinchevskiA (2019) Transmitted Wounds: Media and the Mediation of Trauma. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
95.
PoellTNieborgSDuffyBE (2021) Platforms and Cultural Production. Cambridge: Polity Press.
96.
PopescuDI (2019) Eulogy of a different kind: letters to Henio and the unsettled memory of the Holocaust in contemporary Poland. Holocaust Studies25(3): 273–299.
97.
PopescuDISchultT (2015) Revisiting Holocaust Representation in the Post-Witness Era. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
98.
RadfordAKimJWXuT, et al. (2023) Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision. In: International conference on machine learning, pp. 28492–28518. PMLR. Available at: https://cdn.openai.com/papers/whisper.pdf
99.
RangerJRangerW (2023) Towards a resonant theory of memory politics. Memory Studies16(2): 451–464.
100.
RayLKapralskiS (2019) Introduction to the special issue – disputed Holocaust memory in Poland. Holocaust Studies25(3): 209–219.
101.
RothbergM (2009) Multidirectional Memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the Age of Decolonization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
102.
SchultzCKN (2023) Creating the ‘virtual’ witness: the limits of empathy. Museum Management and Curatorship38(1): 2–17.
103.
SchweberS (2015) Holocaust fatigue in schools today. Social Studies Today70(1): 44–49.
104.
ShandlerJ (2017) Holocaust Memory in the Digital Age: Survivors’ Stories and New Media Practices. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
SteinA (2014) Too much memory? Holocaust fatigue in the era of the victim. In: SteinA (ed.) Reluctant Witnesses: Survivors, Their Children, and the Rise of Holocaust Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 166–182.
107.
Steir-LivnyL (2020) Eva.stories: disrespect or a successful change in Holocaust memory?Jewish Film & New Media: An International Journal8(2): 129–152.
108.
Steir-LivnyL (2022) Traumatic past in the present: COVID-19 and Holocaust memory in Israeli media, digital media, and social media. Media, Culture & Society44(3): 464–478.
109.
StephensC (2021) Playing pretend on social media. In: WaldenVG (ed.) Digital Holocaust Memory, Education and Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 237–265.
110.
StevensGO’DonnellVLWilliamsL (2015) Public domain or private data? Developing an ethical approach to social media research in an interdisciplinary project. Educational Research and Evaluation21(2): 154–167.
111.
SubotićJ (2023) Holocaust memory and political legitimacy in contemporary Europe. Holocaust Studies29(4): 502–519.
TintiangkoJFungAYHLeo-LiuJ (2023) Compelled TikTok creators? The ambivalent affordances of the short video app for Filipino musicians. Media, Culture & Society45(8): 1600–1615.
114.
TrzossAWernerWKleistC, et al. (2023) The politicisation of historical memory on Twitter. ‘Positive antisemitism’ in the Holocaust debate in Poland. Rethinking History27(4): 780–810.
115.
van DijckJ (2013) The Culture of Connectivity. A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
116.
WaldenVG (2021) Digital Holocaust Memory, Education and Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
117.
WaldenVG (2022) Understanding Holocaust memory and education in the digital age: before and after COVID-19. Holocaust Studies28(3): 257–278.
118.
WangXGuoY (2023) Motivations on TikTok addiction: the moderating role of algorithm awareness on young people. Profesional de la Información32(4): 1–10.
119.
WeberMKoehlerCZiegeleM, et al. (2020) Online hate does not stay online – how implicit and explicit attitudes mediate the effect of civil negativity and hate in user comments on prosocial behavior. Computers in Human Behavior104: 106192.
120.
WetzelJ (2017) Soft denial in different political and social areas on the web. In: McElligottAHerfJ (eds) Antisemitism Before and Since the Holocaust: Altered Contexts and Recent Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 305–331.
121.
WieviorkaA (2006) The Era of the Witness. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
122.
WightCStanleyP (2022) Holocaust heritage digilantism on Instagram. Tourism Recreation Research. Epub ahead of print December. DOI: 10.1080/02508281.2022.2153994.
YuningDLiCGuoR, et al. (2021) PP-OCRv2: bag of tricks for ultra lightweight OCR system. ArXiv abs/2109.03144. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.03144 (accessed 30 January 2024).
125.
ZalewskaM (2020) The Last Goodbye (2017): virtualizing witness testimonies of the Holocaust. Spectator40: 45–52.
126.
ZengJAbidinC (2021) ‘#OkBoomer, time to meet the Zoomers’: studying the memefication of intergenerational politics on TikTok. Information, Communication & Society24(16): 2459–2481.
