The article examines the combinations of conditions that explain the maintenance of pro-dictatorship memorialization in democratic Chile, where various pro-dictatorship memory sites, memorials, squares, and street names still positively commemorate the military dictatorship or associated elements (1973–1990). The study used four main explanatory factors and subjected them to a Qualitative Comparative Analysis. The procedure revealed that, in Chile, pro-dictatorship memory sites are maintained through two main paths. On one hand, “Walls” (veto players) block elimination demands and guarantee the pro-dictatorship sites’ maintenance. On the other hand, it is the combination of “Silence” (absence of human rights organizations denouncing the site) and “Local and/or Institutional Support” (protection granted by local communities or state agencies) that explain the maintenance of pro-dictatorship memorialization. These results reflect a unique sociological attempt to understand the phenomenon of pro-dictatorship legacies and their permanence in democracy.
AdamsDLarkhamP (2022) Contesting urban monuments: future directions for the controversial monumental landscapes of civic grandeur. International Journal of Heritage Studies28(8): 891–906.
3.
AgüeroF (2004) Authoritarian legacies: the military’s role. In: HiteKCesariniP (eds) Authoritarian Legacies and Democracy in Latin America and Southern Europe. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 233–262.
4.
AguileraC (2015) Memories and silences of a segregated city: monuments and political violence in Santiago, Chile (1970–1991). Memory Studies8(1): 102–114.
5.
AguileraCBadillaM (2021) The 2019–2020 Chilean anti-neoliberal uprising: a catalyst for decolonial de-monumentalization. Memory Studies14(6): 1226–1240.
6.
AguileraCBadillaM (2022) Human rights memorials in turmoil: Antagonistic memories in contemporary Chile. Political Geography98: 102731.
AlegríaCE (2021) Elite Interview #10, Interview with César Eloy Alegría, 28 September 2021.
9.
AngellA (2007) Democracy after Pinochet: Politics, Parties and Elections in Chile. London: Institute for the Study of the Americas.
10.
Anonymous Key Informant #13, El Bosque (2021) El Bosque, 16 March 2021, Former Villa Augusto Pinochet, 1.10pm–1.30pm, Santiago, Chile.
11.
Barahona de BritoAGonzález-EnríquezCAguilarP (2001) Introduction. In: González EnríquezCBarahona de BritoAAguilar FernándezP (eds) The Politics of Memory. Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–39.
12.
BartoliniF (2019) Dealing with a dictatorial past. Fascist monuments and conflicting memory in contemporary Italy. In: MacalusoLA (ed.) Monument Culture. International Perspectives on the Future of Monuments in a Changing World. Lanham, MD; Boulder, CO; New York; London: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 233–242.
BennettA (2008) Process tracing: a Bayesian perspective. In: Box-SteffensmeierJBradyHECollierD (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 702–721.
15.
Berg-SchlosserDDe MeurG (2009) Comparative research design: case and variable selection. In: RaginCRihouxB (eds) Configurational Comparative Methods [Electronic Resource]: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. London: Sage, pp. 19–32.
16.
BustamanteJ (2021) Patrimonios desafectados, destruidos y reactualizados Apuntes para comprender los procesos de redefinición del campo patrimonial. Alteridades31(62): 117–133.
17.
CárdenasS (2010) Human Rights in Latin America. Politics of Terror and Hope. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Centro de DD.HH. UDP (2009) Verdad y justicia. Las violaciones a los derechos humanos durante el régimen militar. Informe anual sobre DD.HH. en Chile 2009—UDP. Santiago, Chile: Centro de DD.HH. Facultad de Derecho, Universidad Diego Portales.
20.
CollinsC (2018) Informe anual sobre DD.HH. en Chile 2018—UDP—Negacionismo en la era de la postverdad: Verdad, justicia y memoria en Chile a dos décadas del “Caso Pinochet.” Informe anual sobre DD.HH. en Chile 2019—UDP. Santiago, Chile: Centro de DD.HH. Facultad de Derecho, Universidad Diego Portales.
21.
CollinsC (2021) Elite Interview #6—Interview with Cath Collins, 27 September 2021.
22.
Collins C and Observatorio de Justicia Transicional de la UDP (2020) “¿Abrirán las grandes alamedas?” Justicia, memoria y no-repetición en tiempos constituyentes. In: Informe Anual Sobre DD.HH En Chile 2020. Santiago, Chile: Centro de DD.HH. Facultad de Derecho, Universidad Diego Portales, pp. 485–596.
23.
CollinsCHiteK (2013a) Fragmentos de memoriales, silencios monumentales y despertares en el Chile del siglo XXI. In: CollinsCHiteKJoignantA (eds) Las Políticas de La Memoria En Chile: Desde Pinochet a Bachelet. Santiago, Chile: Universidad Diego Portales, pp. 161–191.
24.
CollinsCHiteK (2013b) Memorials, silences and reawakenings. In: CollinsCHiteKJoignantA (eds) The Politics of Memory in Chile: From Pinochet to Bachelet. Boulder, CO: First Forum Press, pp. 133–163.
Comandancia en Jefe del Ejército de Chile (2019) Informe del Ejército para la Corte de Apelaciones sobre las placas de Manuel Contreras. Causa rol 79.631-2019 “RENDON con EJERCITO DE CHILE.” Available at: https://corte.pjud.cl/SITCORTEPORTAL/DownloadFile.do?TIP_Documento=2&TIP_Archivo=3&COD_Opcion=1&COD_Corte=90&CRR_IdEscrito=11622706&CRR_IdDocEscrito=7746449
27.
ConwayB (2009) Rethinking difficult pasts: bloody Sunday (1972) as a case study. Cultural Sociology3(3): 397–413.
28.
Elite Interview #12 (2020), 28 February 2020.
29.
ErrázurizLHLeivaG (2012) El Golpe Estético. Dictadura Militar En Chile (1973–1990). Santiago, Chile: Ocho Libros.
ForestBJohnsonJ (2002) Unravelling the threads of history: soviet-era monuments and post-soviet national identity in Moscow. Annals of the Association of American Geographers92(3): 524–547.
32.
FrankSRisticM (2020) Urban fallism. Monuments, iconoclasm and activism. City24(3–4): 552–564.
GoffmanE (1986 [1963]) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: First Touchstone Edition.
35.
González-OcantosE (2016) Shifting Legal Visions: Judicial Change and Human Rights Trials in Latin America (Cambridge Studies in Law and Society). New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Gonzalez-OcantosE (2020) The Politics of Transitional Justice in Latin America Power, Norms, and Capacity Building. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
GuillouAY (2016) El “señor de la tierra.” La rendición de cultos al cenotafio de Pol Pot. In: AlijaRAArzoumanianAGaribianS, et al (eds) La Muerte Del Verdugo: Reflexiones Interdisciplinarias Sobre El Cadáver de Los Criminales de Masa. Buenos Aires: CIEPP, pp. 59–78.
38.
HilbinkL (2007) Judges beyond Politics in Democracy and Dictatorship: Lessons from Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge Studies in Law and Society.
39.
HiteK (2003) El monumento a Salvador Allende en el debate político chileno. In: JelinELanglandV (eds) Monumentos, Memoriales y Marcas Territoriales. Madrid: Siglo XXI, pp. 19–55.
40.
HiteKAguilarP (2004) Historical memory and authoritarian legacies in processes of political change: Spain and Chile. In: HiteKCesariniP (eds) Authoritarian Legacies and Democracy in Latin America and Southern Europe. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 191–231.
41.
HiteKCesariniP (2004) Conclusion: toward an institutionalist and cultural synthesis. In: HiteKCesariniP (eds) Authoritarian Legacies and Democracy in Latin America and Southern Europe. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 323–324.
42.
HiteKCollinsC (2009) Memorial fragments, monumental silences and reawakenings in 21st-Century Chile. Millenium: Journal of International Studies38(2): 379–400.
43.
HuneeusC (2014) La democracia semisoberana: Chile después de Pinochet. Santiago, Chile: Taurus/Aguilar Chilena de Ediciones S.A.
44.
HuneeusCIbarraS (2013) La memoria del régimen de Pinochet desde la opinión pública. In: CollinsCHiteKJoignantA (eds) Las Políticas de La Memoria En Chile: Desde Pinochet a Bachelet. Santiago, Chile: Universidad Diego Portales, pp. 227–264.
45.
IllanesMA (2002) La Batalla de La Memoria: Ensayos Históricos de Nuestro Siglo. Chile, 1900–2000. Santiago, Chile: Planeta—Ariel.
JelinE (2003) State Repression and the Labors of Memory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
49.
JelinELanglandV (2003) Introducción: las marcas territoriales como nexo entre pasado y presente. In: JelinELanglandV (eds) Monumentos, Memoriales y Marcas Territoriales. Madrid: Siglo XXI, pp. 1–18.
50.
JoignantA (2013) Pinochet’s funeral: memory, history and immortality. In: CollinsCHiteKJoignantAlfredo (eds) The Politics of Memory in Chile: From Pinochet to Bachelet. Boulder, CO: First Forum Press, pp. 165–195.
51.
JordanJ (2006) Structures of Memory: Understanding Urban Change in Berlin and beyond. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
52.
La Batalla de Plaza Italia (2008) Santiago, Chile.
LeviNRothbergM (2018) Memory studies in a moment of danger: fascism, postfascism, and the contemporary political imaginary. Memory Studies11(3): 355–367.
56.
McCarthyJDZaldMN (1977) Resource mobilization and social movements: a partial theory. American Journal of Sociology82(6): 1212–1241.
57.
MacdonaldS (2009) Difficult Heritage: Negotiating the Nazi past in Nuremberg and beyond. New York: Routledge.
58.
MahoneyJ (2007) Qualitative methodology and comparative politics. Comparative Political Studies40(2): 122–144.
59.
MartinsL (1986) The “liberalization” of authoritarian rule in Brazil. In: O’DonnellGASchmitterPC (eds) Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. London: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 72–94.
60.
MiltonCE (2015) Curating memories of armed state actors in Peru’s era of transitional justice. Memory Studies8(3): 361–378.
61.
MiltonCE (2018) Conflicted Memory: Military Cultural Interventions and the Human Rights Era in Peru (Critical Human Rights). Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
62.
MisztalBA (2003) Theories of Social Remembering. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.
NoraP (1989) Between memory and history: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Representations26: 7–24.
66.
NorrisPInglehartR (2019) Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67.
O’DonnellG (1992) Transitions, continuities and paradoxes. In: MainwaringSO’DonnellGAValenzuelaJS (eds) Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 17–56.
PayneLA (2008) Unsettling Accounts: Neither Truth nor Reconciliation in Confessions of State Violence (Cultures and Practice of Violence Series). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
70.
PayneLALessaFPereiraG (2015) Overcoming barriers to justice in the age of Human Rights Accountability. Human Rights Quarterly37(3): 728–754.
71.
PayneLAPereiraGBernal- BermúdezL (2019) Transitional Justice and Corporate Accountability From Below: Deploying Archimedes’ Lever. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72.
PollackM (1999) The New Right in Chile, 1973-1997 (St. Antony’s Series). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
73.
PowerTJ (2000) The Political Right in Postauthoritarian Brazil: Elites, Institutions, and Democratization. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
74.
RaginC (2014) The Comparative Method. Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. 2nd ed.Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
RigneyA (2022) Toxic monuments and mnemonic regime change. Studies on National Movements9: 7–41.
77.
RihouxB (2006) Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and related systematic comparative methods. recent advances and remaining challenges for social research. International Sociology21(5): 679–706.
78.
RihouxBDe MeurG (2009) Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA). In: RaginCRihouxB (eds) Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. London: Sage, pp. 33–68.
79.
RihouxBLobeB (2009) The case for Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): adding leverage for thick cross-case comparison. In: ByrneDRaginC (eds) The Sage Handbook of Case-Based Methods. London: Sage, pp. 222–242.
80.
RojasH (2017) Indifference to past Human Rights Violations in Chile: the impact on transitional justice success, 1990–2017. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford.
81.
RojasH (2022) Past Human Rights Violations and the Question of Indifference: The Case of Chile. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
82.
RowseTWatertonE (2020) The ‘difficult heritage’ of the Native Mounted Police. Memory Studies13(4).
83.
Ruipérez NúñezADinasE (2023) Mean streets: power, ideology and the politics of memory. Political Geography103: 102840.
84.
SalviV (2011) The slogan “complete memory”: a reactive (re)-signification of the memory of the disappeared in Argentina. In: LessaFDruliolleV (eds) The Memory of State Terrorism in the Southern Cone. Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 43–61.
85.
SalviV (2012) De Vencedores a víctimas: Memorias militares sobre el pasado reciente en la Argentina (Latitud sur colección). Buenos Aires: Editorial Biblos.
Santiago Court of Appeals (2020) Sentencia de la Corte de Apelaciones de Santiago, 22 enero 2020 en causa rol No 79.183, estatua de José Toribio Merino. Corte de Apelaciones de Santiago. Available at: https://corte.pjud.cl/SITCORTEPORTAL/DownloadFile.do?TIP_Documento=3&TIP_Archivo=3&COD_Opcion=1&COD_Corte=90&CRR_IdTramite=29439534&CRR_IdDocumento=26148221
SferrazzaPBustosF (2021) La protección judicial del derecho a la memoria: la remoción de las imágenes de un genocida. Revista de Derecho (Valdivia) 34(1): 341–352.
90.
SikkinkKKeckME (1998) Activists beyond Borders. Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
91.
SmallML (2009) How many cases do I need? On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography10(1): 5–38.
92.
SternSJ (2006) Remembering Pinochet’s Chile: On the Eve of London, 1998. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
93.
SternSJ (2010) Reckoning with Pinochet: The Memory Question in Democratic Chile, 1989-2006. Durham, NC; London: Duke University Press.
94.
SternSJWinnP (2016) El tortuoso camino chileno a la memorialización (1990–2011). In: SternSJWinnPLorenzF, et al. (eds) No Hay Mañana Sin Ayer: Batallas Por La Memoria Histórica En El Cono Sur. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, pp. 261–410.
95.
TaliMAstahovskaI (2022) The return of suppressed memories in Eastern Europe: locality and unsilencing difficult histories. Memory Studies15(3): 511–522.
96.
TarrowS (2011) Power in Movement. 3rd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
97.
Thesis fieldwork notes #1 (2019) Fieldwork Notes #1 - Linares, 11 September 2019 - Pro-regime commemoration at the Presidente Augusto Pinochet Square - 7pm - 9pm. Fieldwork Notes 1, Fieldwork Notes, 11 September. Linares, Maule Region.
98.
Thesis fieldwork notes #16 (2021) Fieldwork Notes #16 - Valparaíso, inside the National Maritime Museum (JTM exhibition), 11 August 2021 - 12pm - 1pm. Fieldwork Notes 16, Fieldwork Notes, 11 August. National Maritime Museum, Valparaíso.
99.
TsebelisG (2002) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
100.
WagemannCSchneiderCQ (2010) Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets: agenda for a research approach and a data analysis technique. Comparative Sociology9: 376–396.
101.
WildeA (2013) A season of memory: human rights in Chile’s long transition. In: CollinsCHiteKJoignantA (eds) The Politics of Memory in Chile: From Pinochet to Bachelet. Boulder, CO: First Forum Press, pp. 31–60.
102.
WildeboerRDujisinZ (2022) Spain’s democratic anxieties through the lens of Franco’s reburial. Memory Studies16: 837–860.
103.
ZavattiF (2021) Making and contesting far right sites of memory. A case study on Romania. Memory Studies14(5): 949–970.
