Trans theoretical approaches to memory and relatedness: Potentials and suggestions at the intersections of transgender studies and queer studies

Abstract

This article focuses on the question of, Can we study memory and its curious itineraries as spaces of kin-making? By focusing on the stories of trans mothers and trans daughters, this research aims to show how women with trans experiences play with the gendered and sexualized links between body, family, time, and memory. The article is organized into two main sections. The first part focuses on everyday practices and experiences of trans motherhoods and trans daughterhoods to illustrate how memory formation and memory transmission are crucial components in the construction of kin-ties and individual identity. Second, I turn my attention to the literature on transcultural and transgenerational memories, highlighting how scholars working across the fields of memory, kinship, and trans and queer studies enrich the scope of trans*. Engaging with trans* approaches to memory and relatedness, expands and plays with legal, political, and social experiences of spatial and temporal confinement while inviting us to attentively see lived experiences that unapologetically experiment with the links between memory and relatedness.

Keywords

kin-making trans matrilineality trans motherhoods trans-generation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aizura

(2006) Of borders and homes: the imaginary community of (trans) sexual citizenship. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 7(2): 289–309.

Amin

(2014) Temporality. Transgender Studies Quarterly 1(1–2): 219–222.

Bailey

(2013). Butch queens up in pumps: Gender, performance, and ballroom culture in Detroit. University of Michigan Press.

Bond

(2014) Types of Transculturality: Narrative Frameworks and the Commemoration of 9/11. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 61–80.

Bond

Rapson

(2014) The Transcultural Turn. Interrogating Memory between and beyond Borders. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Bond

Craps

Vermeulen

(eds) (2016) Memory Unbound: Tracing the Dynamics of Memory Studies. Berghahn Books.

Çalışkan

(2019) Queer postmemory. European Journal of Women’s Studies 26(3): 261–273.

Crowley

(2022) Language ideologies and legitimacy among nonbinary YouTubers. Journal of Language and Sexuality 11(2): 165–189.

Dahl

(2023) Where is the T* in European Journal of Women’s Studies? European Journal of Women’s Studies 30(2): 269–273.

10.

DeVun

Tortorici

(2018) Trans, time, and history. Transgender Studies Quarterly 5(4): 518–539.

11.

Dragojlovic

Quinan

(2023) Queering memory: toward re-membering otherwise. Memory Studies 16(1): 3–11.

12.

Erll

(2016) Travelling memory. In: Crownshaw

(ed.) Transcultural Memory. London: Routledge, pp. 17–31.

13.

Erll

(2014a) Generation in literary history: Three constellations of generationality, genealogy, and memory. New Literary History 45(3): 385–409.

14.

Erll

(2014b) Transcultural memory. Témoigner. Entre histoire et mémoire. Revue pluridisciplinaire de la Fondation Auschwitz 119: 178.

15.

Evans

(2023) The Queer Art of History: Queer Kinship after Fascism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

16.

Freeman

(2007) Queer Belongings: Kinship Theory and Queer Theory. In: Haggerty

McGarry

(eds) A Companion to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Studies. Malden, MA: : Blackwell Publishing, pp. 293–314.

17.

Freeman

(2010) Time binds: Queer Temporalities, Queer Histories. Duke University Press.

18.

Ghosh

Sehdev

(2022) Generations. Feminist Anthropology 3(2): 246–253.

19.

Gutman

Wüstenberg

(2022) Challenging the meaning of the past from below: a typology for comparative research on memory activists. Memory Studies 15(5): 1070–1086.

20.

Halberstam

(2017) Trans: A Quick and Quirky Account of Gender Variability. Vol. 3. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

21.

Hirsch

(2008) The generation of postmemory. Poetics Today 29(1): 103–128.

22.

Horvat

(2020) Haunting and queer histories: representing memory in Jill Soloway’s Transparent. Feminist Media Studies 20(3): 398–413.

23.

Lau

(2016) Between the Times: Trans-Temporality, and Historical Representation. Los Angeles: University of California.

24.

Lugones

(2007) Heterosexualism and the colonial/modern gender system. Hypatia 22(1): 186-219.

25.

Malatino

(2020) Trans Care. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

26.

Mookherjee

(2015) The spectral wound: Sexual violence, public memories, and the Bangladesh war of 1971. Duke University Press.

27.

Olick

Sierp

Wüstenberg

(2017) The memory studies association: ambitions and an invitation. Memory Studies 10(4): 490–494.

28.

O’Sullivan

(2021) The colonial project of gender (and everything else). Genealogy 5(3): 67.

29.

Rothberg

(2009) Multidirectional Memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the Age of Decolonization. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.

30.

Savci

(2020) Queer in Translation: Sexual Politics Under Neoliberal Islam. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

31.

Sirman

(2013) The making of familial citizenship in Turkey 1. Citizenship in a global world. London: Routledge, pp. 147–172.

32.

Snorton

(2017) Black on Both Sides: A Racial History of Trans Identity. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

33.

Stryker

(2017) Transgender History: The Roots of Today’s Revolution. London: Hachette UK.

34.

Taşcıoğlu

(2021) States of exception: Legal governance of trans women in urban Turkey. Social & Legal Studies 30(3): 384–404.

35.

Weigel

(2002) “Generation” as a symbolic form: on the genealogical discourse of memory since 1945. The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory 77(4): 264–277.

36.

Zengin

(2016) Violent intimacies: tactile state power, sex/gender transgression, and the politics of touch in contemporary Turkey. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies 12(2): 225–245.

37.

Zimman

(2017) Transgender language reform: Some challenges and strategies for promoting trans-affirming, gender-inclusive language. Journal of Language and Discrimination 1(1): 84–105.