The field of memory studies has, in recent years, experienced a ‘nonhuman turn’ that extends the analytical focus beyond anthropocentric functions of collective remembering. However, while this growing literature has considerably enhanced our understanding of how memories of environmental change may promote a stronger sense of connectedness with nature, the different arguments – developed mainly through critical readings of cultural texts – have yet to be investigated empirically. By means of an original survey of 1,100+ adults in Aotearoa New Zealand, the paper here provides a first step towards addressing the empirical gap in the ‘nonhuman turn’ literature. Two main findings emerge from this analysis. First, knowing about historical environmental change and overestimating the extent of environmental change make it more likely that individuals see themselves as part of nature. Second, the survey demonstrates that the relationship between memories of environmental change and closeness to nature interacts with wider political conflicts over how to remember the colonial past. In particular, the question of who to blame for historical environmental change shapes the effect of ecological memories in different ways, depending on whether respondents identify as European New Zealanders or Indigenous Māori.
AndersonA (2013) A fragile plenty: pre-European Māori and the New Zealand environment. In: PawsonEBrookingT (eds) Making a New Land: Environmental Histories of New Zealand. Dunedin, New Zealand: Otago University Press, pp. 35–51.
2.
BeattieJ (2003) Environmental anxiety in New Zealand, 1840-1941: climate change, soil erosion, sand drift, flooding and forest conservation. Environment and History9(4): 379–392.
3.
BelichJ (2007) Making Peoples: A History of the New Zealanders – From Polynesian Settlement to the End of the Nineteenth Century. North Shore, New Zealand: Penguin Books.
4.
BellC (1996) Inventing New Zealand: Everyday Myths of Pakeha Identity. Auckland, New Zealand: Penguin Books.
5.
BellJPoushterJFaganM, et al. (2021) In Response to Climate Change, Citizens in Advanced Economies Are Willing to Alter How They Live and Work. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/
6.
BishtP (2018) Social movements and the scaling of memory and justice in Bhopal. Contemporary South Asia26(1): 18–33.
7.
BrookingT (2021) Changing attitudes towards wilderness in Aotearoa/New Zealand: from disappointment to glorification and guardianship. In: BartelRBranaganMUtleyF, et al. (eds) Rethinking Wilderness and the Wild: Conflict, Conservation and Co-Existence. Abingdon; New York: Routledge, pp. 105–122.
8.
BuellL (2017) Uses and abuses of environmental memory. In: HartmanS (ed.) Contesting Environmental Imaginaries: Nature and Counternature in a Time of Global Change. Leiden; Boston, MA: Brill, pp. 95–116.
9.
ChawlaL (2020) Childhood nature connection and constructive hope: a review of research on connecting with nature and coping with environmental loss. People and Nature2(3): 619–642.
10.
ClaytonSD (2003) Environmental identity: a conceptual and an operational definition. In: ClaytonSDOpotowS (eds) Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 45–65.
11.
ClaytonSDOpotowS (2003) Introduction: identity and the natural environment. In: ClaytonSDOpotowS (eds) Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–24.
12.
CowieLJGreavesLMMilfontTL, et al. (2016) Indigenous identity and environmental values: do spirituality and political consciousness predict environmental regard among Māori?International Perspectives in Psychology5(4): 228–244.
13.
CrapsS (2020) Introduction: ecological grief. American Imago77(1): 1–7.
14.
CrapsSCrownshawRWenzelJ, et al. (2018) Memory studies and the Anthropocene: a roundtable. Memory Studies11(4): 498–515.
15.
CunsoloA (2017) Climate change as the work of mourning. In: CunsoloALandmanK (eds) Mourning Nature: Hope at the Heart of Ecological Loss and Grief. Montreal, QC, Canada; Kingston, ON, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press, pp. 169–189.
16.
CunsoloALandmanK (2017) Introduction: To mourn beyond the human. In: CunsoloALandmanK (eds) Mourning Nature: Hope at the Heart of Ecological Loss and Grief. Montreal, QC, Canada; Kingston, ON, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press, pp. 3–26.
17.
de Massol de RebetzC (2020) Remembrance day for lost species: remembering and mourning extinction in the Anthropocene. Memory Studies13(5): 875–888.
18.
DurieET (2012) Ancestral laws of Māori: continuities of land, people and history. In: KeenanD (ed.) Huia Histories of Māori. Wellington, New Zealand: Huia Publishers, pp. 1–11.
19.
FeindtGKrawatzekFMehlerD, et al. (2014) Entangled memory: toward a third wave in memory studies. History and Theory53(1): 24-44.
20.
Garde-HansenJMcEwenLHolmesA, et al. (2017) Sustainable flood memory: remembering as resilience. Memory Studies10(4): 384–405.
21.
HalbwachsM (1992) On Collective Memory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
HarrisA (2004) Hīkoi: Forty Years of Māori Protest. Wellington, New Zealand: Huia Publishers.
23.
HearnT (2013) Mining the quarry. In: PawsonEBrookingT (eds) Making a New Land: Environmental Histories of New Zealand. Dunedin, New Zealand: Otago University Press, pp. 106–121.
24.
HellmannO (2022) Visual narratives of environmental change: collective memory and identity at New Zealand heritage sites. Visual Communication. Epub ahead of print 18 March. DOI: 10.1177/14703572221078974.
25.
HillRS (2012) People, land and the struggle for rangatiratanga/autonomy in New Zealand. Identities19(1): 26–42.
26.
HuangH (2015) International knowledge and domestic evaluations in a changing society: the case of China. American Political Science Review109(3): 613–634.
27.
JørgensenD (2019) Recovering Lost Species in the Modern Age: Histories of Longing and Belonging. Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press.
28.
KashimaYPaladinoAMargettsEA (2014) Environmentalist identity and environmental striving. Journal of Environmental Psychology38: 64–75.
29.
KawharuM (2000) Kaitiakitanga: a Maori anthropological perspective of the Maori socio-environmental ethic of resource management. The Journal of the Polynesian Society109(4): 349–370.
30.
KelzRKnappeH (2021) Politics of time and mourning in the Anthropocene. Social Sciences10(10): 368.
31.
KennedyR (2017) Multidirectional eco-memory in an era of extinction: colonial whaling and Indigenous dispossession in Kim Scott’s That Deadman Dance. In: HeiseUChristensenJNiemannM (eds) The Routledge Companion to the Environmental Humanities. Abingdon; New York: Routledge, pp. 268–277.
32.
KingCM (2019) Invasive Predators in New Zealand: Disaster on Four Small Paws. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
KingCMForsythD (2021) Editors’ introduction. In: KingCMForsythD (eds) The Handbook of New Zealand Mammals. 3rd ed.Dunedin, New Zealand: Otago University Press, pp. xiv–xxxv.
34.
KnightC (2016) New Zealand’s Rivers: An Environmental History. Christchurch, New Zealand: Canterbury University Press.
35.
LiebermannYNeumannB (2020) Archives for the Anthropocene: planetary memory in contemporary Global South literature. Lit: Literature Interpretation Theory31(2): 146–164.
36.
LockhartCHoukamauCASibleyCG, et al. (2019) To be at one with the land: Māori spirituality predicts greater environmental regard. Religions10(7): 427.
37.
McGloneMS (1989) The Polynesian settlement of New Zealand in relation to environmental and biotic changes. New Zealand Journal of Ecology12: 115–129.
38.
MostertE (2020) Water and national identity in the Netherlands: the history of an idea. Water History12(3): 311–329.
39.
O’KeyD (2021) Why look at taxidermy animals? Exhibiting, curating and mourning the Sixth Mass Extinction Event. International Journal of Heritage Studies27(6): 635–653.
40.
OlivosPClaytonS (2017) Self, nature and well-being: sense of connectedness and environmental identity for quality of life. In: Fleury-BahiGPolENavarroO (eds) Handbook of Environmental Psychology and Quality of Life Research. Cham: Springer, pp. 107–126.
41.
PaulH (2014) The Myths That Made America: An Introduction to American Studies. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
42.
PedenR (2011) Pastoralism and the transformation of the open grassland. In: BrookingTPawsonE (eds) Seeds of Empire: The Environmental Transformation of New Zealand. London; New York: I.B. Tauris, pp. 73–93.
43.
PerreaultT (2018) Mining, meaning and memory in the Andes. The Geographical Journal184(3): 229–241.
44.
PhillipsJ (1996) A Man’s Country? The Image of the Pakeha Male – A History. Rev. ed. Auckland, New Zealand: Penguin Books.
45.
RandersonJYatesA (2017) Negotiating the ontological gap: place, performance, and media art practices in Aotearoa/New Zealand. In: MonaniSAdamsonJ (eds) Ecocriticism and Indigenous Studies: Conversations from Earth to Cosmos. New York; Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 23–43.
46.
ReidKBeilinRMcLennanJ (2018) Shaping and sharing responsibility: social memory and social learning in the Australian rural bushfire landscape. Society & Natural Resources31(4): 442–456.
47.
RobertsMNormanWMinhinnickN, et al. (1995) Kaitiakitanga: Maori perspectives on conservation. Pacific Conservation Biology2(1): 7–20.
48.
RothbergM (2009) Multidirectional Memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the Age of Decolonization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
49.
SayersJ (2006) Remembering the mother river: the impact of environmental justice on national identity in contemporary China. In: Hood WashingtonSRosierPCGoodallH (eds) Echoes from the Poisoned Well: Global Memories of Environmental Injustice. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 331–344.
50.
SchultzPW (2001) The structure of environmental concern: concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology21(4): 327–339.
51.
ShoreC (2017) ‘100% pure New Zealand’: national branding and the paradoxes of scale. In: HannerzUGingrichA (eds) Small Countries: Structures and Sensibilities. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 47–66.
52.
SinclairK (1986) A Destiny Apart: New Zealand’s Search for National Identity. Wellington, New Zealand: Allen & Unwin.
53.
StanleySKWilsonMSMilfontTL (2017) Exploring short-term longitudinal effects of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on environmentalism. Personality and Individual Differences108: 174–177.
54.
SzerszynskiB (2019) How the earth remembers and forgets. In: BobbetteADonovanA (eds) Political Geology: Active Stratigraphies and the Making of Life. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 219–236.
55.
Tassell-MatamuaNLindsayNBennettA, et al. (2021) Māori cultural identity linked to greater regard for nature: attitudes and (less so) behavior. Ecopsychology13(1): 9–18.
56.
TrueJ (2005) Country before money? Economic globalization and national identity in New Zealand. In: HelleinerEPickelA (eds) Economic Nationalism in a Globalizing World. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 202–219.
57.
Van der WerffEStegLKeizerK (2013) The value of environmental self-identity: the relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology34: 55–63.
58.
VermeulenP (2020) Literature and the Anthropocene. Abingdon; New York: Routledge.
59.
WertschJV (2009) Collective memory. In: BoyerPWertschJV (eds) Memory in Mind and Culture. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 117–137.
60.
WhitmarshLO’NeillS (2010) Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology30(3): 305–314.
WilsonRJ (2020) Encountering dinosaurs: public history and environmental heritage. The Public Historian42(4): 121–136.
63.
WynnG (2013) Destruction under the guise of improvement? The forest, 1840-1920. In: PawsonEBrookingT (eds) Making a New Land: Environmental Histories of New Zealand. Dunedin, New Zealand: Otago University Press, pp. 122–138.
64.
ZerubavelE (1997) Social Mindscapes: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
