A memory breach is an action, statement, or sociopolitical crisis that calls into dispute the mnemonic order, which is defined as an underlying orientation toward the past that serves to justify the political order and social order within a society. Following a memory breach, the society enters a “state of conception.” Related to the “state of exception” commonly associated with political crisis, the state of conception is a liminal space that follows a memory breach in which a society reexamines the mnemonic order. This article examines three recent memory breaches in Argentina, Germany, and the United States. By comparing three different breaches, each with different outcomes, it offers a framework for understanding memory breaches and the states of conception that they produce.
AllisonDB (ed.) (2018a) Controversial Monuments and Memorials: A Guide for Community Leaders. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
4.
AllisonDB (2018b) From Columbus to Serra and Beyond. In: AllisonDB (ed.) Controversial Monuments and Memorials: A Guide for Community Leaders. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 115–123.
5.
AllisonDB (2018c) Group behavior, self-examination, and clearing the air around the controversial issues. In: AllisonDB (ed.) Controversial Monuments and Memorials: A Guide for Community Leaders. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 145–152.
6.
AndersonB (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
BBC Mundo (2017) Qué es el 2x1, el polémico fallo de la Corte Suprema que favorece a exrepresores y que pone de acuerdo a Marci y Kirchner en Argentina. BBC Mundo, 10May. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-america-latina-39876510 (accessed 27 April 2021).
BourdieuP (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice (trans. NiceR). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Camilo SánchezNUprimny YepesR (2011) Transitional justice without transition? The Colombian experience in the implementation of transition measures. In: BeristainCMorenoC (eds.) Contribution of Truth, Justice, and Reparation Polices to Latin American Democracies. San José, Costa Rica: Inter-American Institute of Human Rights, pp. 121-152.
16.
CardinaMRodriguesIN (2021) The mnemonic transition: the rise of an anti-anticolonial memoryscape in Cape Verde. Memory Studies14(2): 380–394.
17.
CaseyES (2004) Public memory in place and time. In: PhillipsKR (ed.) Framing Public Memory. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press, pp. 17–44.
Cuervo ForeroV (2018) Not what’s broken; what’s healed: women in El Barrio and the healing power of community. In: AllisonDB (ed.) Controversial Monuments and Memorials: A Guide for Community Leaders. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 232–238.
22.
De BritoAB (2010) Transitional justice and memory: exploring perspectives. South European Society and Politics115(3): 359–376.
23.
De BritoABGonzaléz-EnríquezCAguilarP (2001) The Politics of Memory: Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
GrodskyB (2008) Justice without transition: truth commissions in the context of repressive rule. Human Rights Review9: 281–297.
31.
HasianMAJrPaliewiczNS (2020) Memory and Monument Wars in American Cities. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
32.
HaynerP (2010) Unspeakable Truths: Transitional Justice and the Challenge of Truth Commissions. 2nd ed.New York: Routledge.
33.
HirschM (2012) The Generation of Postmemory: Writing and Visual Culture after the Holocaust. New York: Columbia University Press.
34.
Human Rights Watch (2005) Morocco’s Truth Commission: Honoring Past Victims during an Uncertain Past, vol. 17, no. 11(E). New York: Human Rights Watch.
35.
HuyssenA (2003) Present Pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
36.
JelinE (2003) State Repression and the Labors of Memory (trans. ReinJGodoy-AnativiaM). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
37.
KoposovN (2017) Memory Laws, Memory Wars: The Politics of the Past in Europe and Russia. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
KritzN (1995) Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes, vol. I. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace.
39.
LabodeM (2018) Confronting confederate monuments in the twenty-first century. In: AllisonDB (ed.) Controversial Monuments and Memorials: A Guide for Community Leaders. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 27–35.
LandrieuM (2018) Speech upon the removal of confederate statues from New Orleans, May 19, 2017. In: AllisonDB (ed.) Controversial Monuments and Memorials: A Guide for Community Leaders. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 165–172.
WalkerWS (2018) Should the statue of Theodore Roosevelt outside the American museum of natural history be removed? A possible compromise. In: AllisonDB (ed.) Controversial Monuments and Memorials: A Guide for Community Leaders. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 134–143.
61.
WallerJ (2016) Confronting Evil: Engaging Our Responsibility to Prevent Genocide. New York: Oxford University Press.
62.
WhighamK (2022) Resonant Violence: Affect, Memory, and Activism in Post-Genocide Societies. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
63.
WinterS (2014) Transitional Justice in Established Democracies: A Political Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
64.
YoungJ (1993) The Texture of Memory: Holocaust Memorials and Meaning. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
65.
YoungJ (2018) The Stages of Memory: Reflections on Memorial Art, Loss, and the Spaces between. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
