This article explores the multilayered struggles within the memory field in post-dictatorship Chilean society by investigating the Day of the Young Combatant, a commemoration of the murder of two young brothers perpetrated by police officers in 1985. Every 29 March, people born after the end of the dictatorship—members of the post-dictatorship generation—commemorate through cultural activities and violent riots. Since the murder, the commemoration has evolved from local and unofficially recognized to a large-scale, violent event that takes place every year in working-class neighborhoods of Santiago. This article analyzes the contested ways of recalling the murder of these brothers and the multilevel struggle that the post-dictatorship generation engages in to expand the field of memory at three levels: narratives, territories, and practices. It illustrates the multilayered process for negotiating the meanings and time frames to narrate not only the dictatorial past but also the political transition.
AchugarM (2016) Discursive Processes of Intergenerational Transmission of Recent History: (Re)making Our Past. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
2.
AguileraC (2015) Memories and silences of a segregated city: monuments and political violence in Santiago, Chile, 1970–1991. Memory Studies8(1): 102–114.
3.
AndersonB (2006) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London; New York: Verso Books.
4.
ArtD (2006) The Politics of the Nazi past in Germany and Austria. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
AssmannA (2011) From collective violence to a common future: four models for dealing with a traumatic past. In: ModlingerMartinSonntagPhilipp (eds) Other People’s Pain: Narratives of Trauma and the Question of Ethics. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 43–62.
6.
BernhardMKubikJ (2014) Twenty Years after Communism: The Politics of Memory and Commemoration. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
BourdieuP (1991) Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
CabreraE (2007) Historia y protagonismo popular En Villa Francia. BA Thesis, History and Social Sciences Department and ARCIS, Santiago, Chile.
10.
CollinsCHiteKJoignantA (2013) The Politics of Memory in Chile: From Pinochet to Bachelet. Boulder, CO: First Forum Press.
11.
Comisión Nacional de Verdad y Reconciliación (1991) Informe de La Comisión Nacional de Verdad Y Reconciliación (Informe Rettig). Santiago, Chile. Available at: http://bibliotecadigital.indh.cl/handle/123456789/170
12.
Comisión Nacional Sobre Prisión Política y Tortura (2004) Informe de La Comisión Nacional Sobre Prisión Política Y Tortura (Informe Valech). Santiago, Chile. Available at: http://bibliotecadigital.indh.cl/handle/123456789/455
13.
Corporación de Promoción y Defensa de los Derechos del Pueblo (2002) Los Hermanos Vergara. 3rd Volumen Colección Patricio Sobarzo. Santiago, Chile: Online Edition by Equipo Nizkor-Derechos Human Rights. Available at: http://www.derechos.org/nizkor/chile/libros/sobarzo/vergara/
14.
CruzC (2000) Identity and persuasion: how nations remember their pasts and make their futures. World Politics52(3): 275–312.
15.
DavisE (2005) Memories of State: Politics, History, and Collective Identity in Modern Iraq. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
16.
Desfor EdlesL (1998) Symbol and Ritual in the New Spain: The Transition to Democracy after Franco. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
EyermanRTurnerBS (1998) Outline of a theory of generations. European Journal of Social Theory1(1): 91–106.
18.
GillisJR (1996) Commemorations: The Politics of National Identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
HaynerP (2001) Unspeakable Truths: Transitional Justice and the Challenge of Truth Commissions. New York: Routledge.
20.
HirschM (2012) The Generation of Postmemory. New York: Columbia University Press.
21.
HirschM (2014) Connecting histories in vulnerable times. Presidential Address129: 3.
22.
HiteK (2012) Politics and the Art of Commemoration: Memorials to Struggle in Latin America and Spain. New York: Routledge.
23.
HiteKCesariniP (2004) Authoritarian Legacies and Democracy in Latin America and Southern Europe. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
24.
HobsbawmE (2012) The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
JaraD (2016) Children and the Afterlife of State Violence Memories of Dictatorship. Bern: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
JelinE (2002) Los Trabajos De La Memoria. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Siglo XXI.
28.
KlepK (2012) Tracing collective memory: Chilean truth commissions and memorial sites. Memory Studies5(3): 259–269.
29.
LaubD (1992) Bearing witness or the vicissitudes of listening. In: ShoshanaFelmanLaubDori (eds) Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis and History. New York: Routledge, pp. 57–74.
30.
LechnerNGuellP (1998) Construcción Social de las Memorias en la Transición Chilena. In: Paper presentation at the Social Science Research Council Workshop, November, Montevideo, Uruguay.
31.
LeveyC (2014) Of Hijos and Niños: Revisiting Postmemory in Post-Dictatorship Uruguay. History & Memory26(2, Fall/Winter2014): 5–39.
32.
LinzJStephanA (1978) The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Latin America. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
33.
ManiR (2008) Editorial: dilemmas of expanding transitional justice, or forging the nexus between transitional justice and development. The International Journal of Transitional Justice 2: 253–265.
34.
MisztalB (2010) Collective memory in a global age: learning how and what to remember. Current Sociology58(1): 24–44.
35.
MonsalveW (2007) Quién Lucha con Arrogancia? Acción Y Lucha por la Memoria e Identidad Popular: El Caso de Villa Francia. BA Thesis, Universidad De Chile, Departamento De Historia, Santigo, Chile.
36.
MouliánT (1998) Chile Actual. Anatomía de un Mito. Santiago, Chile: Editorial LOM.
37.
O’DonnellGSchmitterP (1986) Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
38.
OffeC (1996) Varieties of Transitions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
39.
OlickJ (1999) Genre memories and memory genres: a dialogical analysis of May 8, 1945 commemorations in the Federal Republic of Germany. American Sociological Review64(3): 381–402.
40.
PiperI (2015) Violencia Política, miedo y amenaza en lugares de memoria. Athenea Digital15(4): 155–172.
41.
RaposoG (2012) Territorios de La Memoria: La Retórica de La Calle En Villa Francia. POLIS Revista Latinoamericana [en línea]31.
42.
ReyesMJCruzMAguirreF (2016) Places of memory and the new generations: some political effects of the transmission of memories of Chile’s recent past. Revista Española De Ciencia Política. Núm41: 93–114.
43.
Roht-ArriazaN (2005) The Pinochet Effect: Transnational Justice in the Age of Human Rights. Philadelphia, PA: Pennsylvania University Press.
44.
RonigerLSznajderM (1998) The politics of memory and oblivion in redemocratized Argentina and Uruguay. History and Memory10: 1133–169.
45.
RosA (2012) The Post-dictatorship Generation in Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay: Collective Memory and Cultural Production. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
46.
RoviraC (2007) Chile: transición pactada y débil autodeterminación colectiva de la sociedad. Revista Mexicana De Sociología69(2): 343–371.
47.
SchneiderCL (1995) Shantytown Protest in Pinochet’s Chile. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
48.
SchwabG (2010) Haunting Legacies: Violent Histories and Transgenerational Trauma. New York: Columbia University Press.
49.
Sharp DustinN (2015) Emancipating transitional justice from the bonds of the paradigmatic transition. The International Journal of Transitional Justice9: 150–169.
50.
SternSJ (2006) Remembering Pinochet’s Chile: On the Eve of London 1998. Durham: Duke University Press Books.
51.
TeitelRG (2000) Transitional Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
52.
TocornalX (2008) The Chilean memory debate: mapping the language of polarisation. Doctoral Thesis, Loughborough University, Loughborough.
