Hegemonic representations of the past and digital agency: Giving meaning to “The Soviet Story” on social networking sites

Abstract

In 2008, Edvīns Šnore, the Latvian film director, released a shocking and provocative documentary, “The Soviet Story,” which explored some terrible episodes from the Soviet past as well as the collaboration between the Soviet and Nazi regimes. Scholars have argued that The Soviet Story is an effective Latvian response to Russian propaganda, but it also exemplifies the broader problems of post-communist memory politics. This article takes a step further in the discussion of The Soviet Story. It focuses on the idea of how memory work triggered by the documentary got started on social networking sites. In particular, the article deals with the video-sharing website YouTube and the Internet encyclopedia Wikipedia, both of which are crucial meaning-making sites with respect to history. The article demonstrates transnational memory work in YouTube and Wikipedia as a multidirectional enterprise that both reinforces and emancipates existing hegemonic representations of controversial past.

Keywords

Reconciliatory discourse remediation of history social networking sites social representations transnational memory victimhood nationalism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adler

(2012) Reconciliation with—or rehabilitation of—the Soviet past? Memory Studies 5(3): 327–338.

Arendt

(1962) The Origins of Totalitarianism. Cleveland, OH; New York: Meridian Books.

Aron

(1969) Democracy and Totalitarianism. New York: Praeger.

Assmann

(2004) Four formats of memory: from individual to collective constructions of the past. In: Emden

Midgley

(eds) Cultural Memory and Historical Consciousness in the German-Speaking World Since 1500. Oxford: Peter Lang, pp. 19–37.

Beck

Cronin

(2006) Cosmopolitan Vision. Malden, MA; Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bell

(2008) Agonistic democracy and the politics of memory. Constellations 15(1): 148–166.

Bender

Morgan

Oxley

. (2011) Annotating social acts: authority claims and alignment moves in Wikipedia talk pages. In: Proceedings of the workshop on language in social media. Portland, OR, 23 June, pp. 48–57. Baltimore, MD: Association for Computational Linguistics.

Berger

(2012) German history politics and the National Socialist past. In: Miller

Limpan

(eds) The Convolutions of Historical Politics. Budapest; New York: Central European University Press, pp. 21–44.

Burgess

Green

(2009) YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity Press.

10.

Closa

(2010a) Dealing with the past: memory and European integration. The Jean Monnet Working Paper Series 1/11. New York: NYU School of Law. Available at: http://tiny.cc/aqjfnw (accessed 3 November 2012).

11.

Closa

(ed.) (2010b) Study on How the Memory of Crimes Committed by Totalitarian Regimes in Europe is Dealt with in the Member States. Madrid: Institute for Public Goods and Policy Centre of Human and Social Sciences CSIC.

12.

Cohen

(1985) Rethinking the Soviet Experience: Politics and History since 1917. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

13.

Contributors to Wikipedia page “The Soviet Story” (n.d.) Available at: http://tiny.cc/hnkpmw (accessed 3 November 2012).

14.

Dahlberg

(2001) The Internet and democratic discourse: exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Communication and Society 4(1): 615–633.

15.

De Bruyn

(2010) World war 2.0: commemorating war and the Holocaust in Poland trough Facebook. Digital Icons: Studies in Russian, Eurasian and Central European New Media 4: 45–62.

16.

Dyukov

(2008) “The Soviet Story”: Forgery Tissue. 2nd ed. Moscow: Historical Memory.

17.

Editor Interaction Analyzer (n.d.). Available at: http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/editorinteract.html (accessed 3 November 2012).

18.

Ekman

Linde

(2005) Communist nostalgia and the consolidation of democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 21(3): 354–374.

19.

Erll

(2010) Literature, film and the mediality of cultural memory. In: Erll

Nünning

Young

(eds) A Companion to Cultural Memory Studies. Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 389–398.

20.

Etkind

(2009) Post-Soviet hauntology: cultural memory of the Soviet terror. Constellations 16(1): 182–200.

21.

Ferron

Massa

(2013) Beyond the encyclopedia: collective memories in Wikipedia. Memory Studies. Epub ahead of print 23 July. DOI: 10.1177/1750698013490590.

22.

Fitzpatrick

(1986) New perspectives on Stalinism. The Russian Review 45: 357–373.

23.

Geyer

Fitzpatrick

(eds) (2009) Beyond Totalitarianism Stalinism and Nazism Compared. New York: Cambridge University Press.

24.

Habermas

(1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

25.

Halbwachs

(1992) On Collective Memory. Chicago, IL; London: The University of Chicago Press.

26.

Hoskins

(2009) Digital network memory. In: Erll

Rigney

(eds) Mediation, Remediation, and the Dynamics of Cultural Memory. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 91–106.

27.

Howarth

(2006) A social representation is not a quiet thing: exploring the critical potential of social representations theory. British Journal of Social Psychology 45: 65–86.

28.

Ījabs

(2008) Cienīga atbilde: Soviet story. Available at: http://www.lvportals.lv/emuari.php?id=44 (accessed 3 November 2012).

29.

Irwin-Zarecka

(1994) Frames of Remembrance: The Dynamics of Collective Memory. New Brunswick, London: Transaction Publishers.

30.

Jaspers

(2000) The Question of German Guilt. New York: Fordham University Press.

31.

Jenkins

(2006) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: University Press.

32.

Jõesalu

Kõresaar

(2013) Continuity or discontinuity: on the dynamics of remembering “mature socialism” in Estonian post-Soviet remembrance culture. Journal of Baltic Studies 44(2): 177–203.

33.

Judt

(2002) The past is another country: myth and memory in post-war Europe. In: Müller

J-W

(ed.) Memory and Power in Post-War Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 157–183.

34.

Kaprāns

(2012) Normalizing the cold war habitus: how Latvian autobiographers cope with their Soviet-time experience. In: Mertelsmann

Piirimäe

(eds) The Baltic Sea Region and the Cold War. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 261–277.

35.

Knudsen

Stage

(2012) Online war memorials: YouTube as a democratic space of commemoration exemplified through video tributes to fallen Danish soldiers. Memory Studies. Epub ahead of print 8 November. DOI: 10.1177/1750698012458309.

36.

Leggewie

(2011) Seven circles of European memory. In: Meusburger

Heffernan

Wunder

(eds) Cultural Memories: The Geographical Point of View. Heidelberg; London; New York: Springer, pp. 127–130.

37.

Lim

J-H

(2010) Victimhood nationalism in contested memories: national mourning and global accountability. In: Assmann

Condrad

(eds) Memory in a Global Age. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 138–162.

38.

Liu

(2005) Social representations of events and people in world history across 12 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 36(2): 171–191.

39.

Liu

Hilton

(2005) How the past weighs on the present: social representations of history and their role in identity politics. British Journal of Social Psychology 44(4): 537–556.

40.

Mark

(2010) The Unfinished Revolution: Making Sense of the Communist Past in Central-Eastern Europe. New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press.

41.

Mälksoo

(2009) The memory of becoming European: the East European subalterns and the collective memory of Europe. European Journal of International Relations 15(4): 653–680.

42.

Mälksoo

(2014) Criminalizing communism: transnational mnemopolitics in Europe. International Political Sociology 8: 82–99.

43.

Mendelson

Gerber

(2005) Soviet nostalgia: an impediment to Russian democratization. The Washington Quarterly 29(1): 83–96.

44.

Miller

(2012) The turns of Russian historical politics, from Prestroika to 2011. In: Miller

Limpan

(eds) The Convolutions of Historical Politics. Budapest; New York: Central European University Press, pp. 253–278.

45.

Moscovici

(2000) Social Representations: Explorations in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

46.

Moscovici

(1988) Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology 18: 211–250.

47.

Muižnieks

(ed.) (2011) The Geopolitics of History in Latvian–Russian Relations. Riga: Academic Press of the University of Latvia.

48.

Müller

J-W

(2002) Introduction: the power of memory, the memory of power and the power over memory. In: Müller

J-W

(ed.) Memory and Power in Post-War Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–36.

49.

Olick

(2003) What does it mean to normalize the past? Official memory in German politics since 1989. In: Olick

(ed.) States of Memory: Continuities, Conflicts, and Transformations in National Retrospections. Durham, NC; London: Duke University Press, pp. 259–288.

50.

Pentzold

(2009) Fixing the floating gap: the online encyclopedia Wikipedia as a global memory place. Memory Studies 2(2): 255–272.

51.

Prutsch

(2013) European Historical Memory: Policies, Challenges and Perspectives. Note. Brussels: European Parliament. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/ou57n85

52.

Rutten

Zvereva

(2013) Introduction: old conflicts, new media: post-socialist digital memories. In: Rutten

Fedor

Zvereva

(eds) Memory, Conflict and New Media: Web Wars in Post-Socialist States. Abingdon; New York: Routledge, pp. 1–18.

53.

Snyder

(2009) The historical reality of Eastern Europe. East European Politics and Societies 23(1): 7–12.

54.

Snyder

(2010) Bloodlands: Europe between Hitler and Stalin. New York: Basic Books.

55.

Soviet Story (n.d.) In: YouTube. Available at: http://tiny.cc/3j96mw (accessed 3 November 2012).

56.

Tajfel

Turner

(1979) An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In: Austin

Worchel

(eds) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole, pp. 33–47.

57.

Thompson

(1999) Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.

58.

The Soviet Story (n.d.) In: Wikipedia. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Soviet_Story (accessed 3 November 2012).

59.

“The Soviet Story” movie trailer (n.d.) YouTube. Available at: http://tiny.cc/vk96mw (accessed 3 November 2012).

60.

The New Chronicles (2008) The Soviet story: первый просмотр. The New Chronicles. Available at: http://novchronic.ru/1393.htm (accessed 3 November 2012).

61.

User Contribution Search (n.d.) Available at: http://tiny.cc/ktkpmw (accessed 3 November 2012).

62.

Van Dijck

(2010) Flickr and the culture of connectivity: sharing views, experiences, memories. Memory Studies 4(4): 401–415.

63.

Wagner

Hayes

(2005) Everyday Discourse and Common Sense—The Theory of Social Representations. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.

64.

Wenger

(1998) Communities of practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

65.

Wezel

(2009) Latvia’s “Soviet story.” Transitional justice and the politics of commemoration. Keywords 2. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/67lch8j (accessed 3 November 2012).

66.

Wikipedia: List of policies and guidelines (n.d.) In: Wikipedia. Available at: http://tiny.cc/25wmmw (accessed 3 November 2012).

67.

Wikipedia: Neutral point of view (n.d.) In: Wikipedia. Available at: http://tiny.cc/1hrsnw (accessed 3 November 2012).

68.

YouTube Community Guidelines (n.d.) In: YouTube. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/t/community_ guidelines (accessed 3 November 2012).

69.

Советская история (фильм, 2008) In: Wikipedia. Available at: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Soviet_Story (accessed 3 November 2012).

70.

Евразийский монитор (2009) Восприятие населением и молодежью новых независимых государств истории советского и постсоветского периодов. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/3usk68r (accessed 9 September 2013).