Over recent decades, public admissions of our past wrongdoing have become increasingly widespread. Usually, these practices are viewed as facilitating more inclusive modes of assimilating collective memories into collective identities. However, this article argues that such admissions can enable claims for having learnt the lessons which ultimately justify discrediting an external other as morally inferior vis-a-vis us. I do so by drawing on Albert Camus’ novel The Fall and its leitmotif ‘[t]he more I accuse myself, the more I have a right to judge you’. I demarcate such rhetorics of judge-penitence from claims for having learnt the lessons which are not based on narrating past wrongdoing as our wrongdoing (rhetorics of judging) and self-critical admissions (rhetorics of penitence). By differentiating and conceptualising these three utilisations of the claim for having learnt the lessons, and by drawing on a wide range of examples, I illustrate that even penitent sinners might turn into complacent judges.
AlexanderJC (2002) On the social construction of moral universals: the Holocaust from war crime trauma to drama. European Journal of Social Theory5(1): 5–85.
2.
AlexanderJC (2006) The Civil Sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
Aristotle (1982) The ‘Art’ of Rhetoric. London: Heinemann.
4.
BarkanE (2001) The Guilt of Nations: Restitution and Negotiating Historical Injustices. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
5.
BarkanEKarnA (eds) (2006) Taking Wrongs Seriously: Apologies and Reconciliation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6.
BaumanZ (2004) Europe – An Unfinished Adventure. Cambridge: Polity.
7.
BroderH (2012) Vergesst Auschwitz! Der deutsche Erinnerungswahn und die Endlösung der Israel-Frage. München: Knaus.
8.
BrooksRL (1999) The age of apology. In: BrooksRL (ed.) When Saying Sorry Isn’t Enough: The Controversy Over Apologies and Reparations for Human Injustice. New York: New York University Press, pp. 3–11.
9.
CamusA (2006) The Fall. London: Penguin.
10.
CelermajerD (2006) The apology in Australia: re-covenanting the national imaginary. In: BarkanEKarnA (eds) Taking Wrongs Seriously: Apologies and Reconciliation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. pp. 153–184.
11.
CiceroMT (1960) Cicero De Oratore, Book III. London: Heinemann.
12.
CohnN (1970) The Pursuit of Millennium: Revolutionary Millenarians and Mystical Anarchists of the Middle Ages. London: Granada.
13.
ConfinoA (2006) Germany as a Culture of Remembrance: Promises and Limits of Writing History. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
14.
CunninghamM (1999) Saying sorry: the politics of apology. Political Quarterly70(3): 285–293.
15.
De CilliaRWodakR (eds) (2009) Gedenken im ‘Gedankenjahr’. Zur diskursiven Konstruktion österreichischer Identität im Jubiläumsjahr 2005. Innsbruck: StudienVerlag.
16.
DinerD (2000) Beyond the Conceivable: Studies on Germany, Nazism, and the Holocaust. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press ‘.
17.
EderK (2009) A theory of collective identity making sense of the debate on a ‘European identity’. European Journal of Social Theory12(4): 427–447.
18.
FinkielkrautA (2004) Im Namen der Anderen. Reflexionen über den kommenden Antisemitismus. In: RabinovociDSpeckUSznaiderN (eds) Neuer Antisemitismus? Eine globale Debatte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 119–132.
19.
ForchtnerBKølvraaC (2012) Narrating a ‘new Europe’: from ‘bitter past’ to self-righteousness. Discourse & Society23(4): 377–400.
20.
FoucaultM (1979) The History of Sexuality, vol. 1. London: Penguin.
21.
GibneyMHoward-HassmannRECoicaudJ-M. (eds) (2008) The Age of Apology: Facing up to the Past. Philadelphia, PA: University of Philadelphia Press.
22.
GiesenB (1998) Intellectuals and the Nation: Collective Identity in a German Axial Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
GiesenB (2004) Triumph and Trauma. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
KølvraaC (2012) Imagining Europe as a Global Player. Brussels: Peter Lang.
36.
KoselleckR (1985) Historia magistra vitae. In: KoselleckR (ed.) Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 21–38.
37.
KumarK (2008) The question of European identity: Europe in the American mirror. European Journal of Social Theory11(1): 87–105.
38.
LauM (2003) Der Irak kann demokratisiert werden. Blauhelme sind aber ein untaugliches Mittel – man denke an Srebrenica. Die Welt, 11February, 9.
39.
LeviP (1989) The Drowned and the Saved. London: Abacus.
40.
LevyDSznaiderN (2002) Memory unbound: The Holocaust and the formation of cosmopolitan memory. European Journal of Social Theory5(1): 87–106.
41.
LübbeH (2001) Ich entschuldige mich. Das neue politische Buβritual. Berlin: Siedler.
42.
MargalitA (2002) The Ethics of Memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
MarkovitsAS (2007) Uncouth Nation: Why Europe Dislikes America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
MenasseR (2003) Bushs law. Der Standard, 22May, 35.
45.
MeyersJ (1974) Camus’ The Fall and van Eyck’s The Adoration of the Lamb. Mosaic7(3): 43–51.
46.
MoellerRG (2001) War Stories: The Search for a Usable Past in the Federal Republic of Germany. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
47.
MoldenF (2003) Appeasement 2003. Die Presse, 8February, 2.
48.
NietzscheF (1973) Beyond Good and Evil. London: Penguin.
49.
NivenB (ed.) (2006) Germans as Victims: Remembering the Past in Contemporary Germany. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
50.
NovickP (2000) The Holocaust in American Life. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
51.
OlickJK (2007) The Politics of Regret: On Collective Memory and Historical Responsibility. New York: Routledge.
52.
PilzP (2003) Mit Gott gegen Alle. Amerikas Kampf um die Weltherrschaft. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt.
53.
RauJ (2003) Gemeinsam handeln – Deutschlands Verantwortung in der Welt. Frankfurter Rundschau, 20May, 7.
54.
ReisiglMWodakR (2009) The discourse-historical approach. In: WodakRMeyerM (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE, pp. 87–121.
55.
Schwab-TrappM (2007) Kampf dem Terror. Vom Anschlag auf das World Trade Center bis zum Beginn des Irakkrieges. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.
56.
SchwartzB (2008) Abraham Lincoln in the Post-Heroic Era: History and Memory in Late Twentieth-Century America. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
57.
SheehanJJ (2008) Where Have All the Soldiers Gone? The Transformation of Modern Europe. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
58.
ShortD (2012) When sorry isn’t good enough: official remembrance and reconciliation in Australia. Memory Studies5(3): 293–304.
59.
SmithP (2005) Why War?Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
60.
SolomonRC (2004) Pathologies of pride in Camus’s The Fall. Philosophy and Literature28(1): 41–59.
61.
SomersMR (1994) The narrative constitution of identity. Theory & Society23: 605–649.
62.
ThierseW (2003) Europas Erfahrungen ernst nehmen!Die Welt, 7April, 8.
63.
ThompsonJ (2009) Apology, historical obligations and the ethics of memory. Memory Studies2(2): 195–210.
64.
TrouillotMR (2000) Abortive rituals: Historical apologies in the global era. Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies2(2): 171–186.
65.
UhlH (2006) From victim myth to co-responsibility thesis: Nazi rule, World War II, and the Holocaust in Austrian memory. In: LebowRNKansteinerWFoguC (eds) The Politics of Memory in Postwar Europe. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 40–72.
66.
Vinitzky-SeroussiVTeegerC (2010) Unpacking the unspoken: silence in collective memory and forgetting. Social Forces88(3): 1103–1122.
67.
WodakR (1996) Disorders of Discourse. London: Longman.
68.
WodakRMenzFMittenR. (1994) Die Sprachen der Vergangenheiten: Öffentliches Gedenken in österreichischen und deutschen Medien. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
69.
ZerubavelE (1996) Social memories: steps to a sociology of the past. Qualitative Sociology19(3): 283–299.
