BrackenLJOughtonEA (2006) ‘What do you mean?’ The importance of language in developing interdisciplinary research. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers31: 371–382.
2.
CassityEAngI (2006) Humanities–industry partnerships and the ‘Knowledge Society’: the Australian experience. Minerva44(1): 47–63.
3.
FergusonSSchubertEStevensC (2010) Movement in a contemporary dance work and its relation to continuous emotional response. In: BeilharzKJohnstonAFergusonS. (eds) Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2010). Sydney, NSW, Australia: University of Technology, Sydney, pp. 481–484.
4.
FrodemanRKleinJTMitchamC. (2010) The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
GlassR (2005) Observer response to contemporary dance. In: GroveRStevensCMcKechnieS (eds) Thinking in Four Dimensions: Creativity and Cognition in Contemporary Dance. Carlton, VIC, Australia: Melbourne University Press, pp. 107–121.
6.
HallJGBainbridgeLBuchanA. (2006) A meeting of minds: interdisciplinary research in the health sciences in Canada. Canadian Medical Association Journal175(7): 763–771.
McKechnieS (2002) Movement as metaphor: the construction of meaning in choreographic art. In: StevensCBurnhamDMcPhersonG. (eds) Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Music Perception & Cognition. Adelaide, SA, Australia: Causal Productions, pp. 157–160.
9.
McKechnieS (2005) Dancing memes, minds, and designs. In: GroveRStevensCMcKechnieS (eds) Thinking in Four Dimensions: Creativity and Cognition in Contemporary Dance. Carlton, VIC, Australia: Melbourne University Press, pp. 81–94.
10.
RhotenD (2004) Interdisciplinary Research: Trend or Transition? Items & Issues: Newsletter of the Social Science Research Council. New York: Social Science Research Council.
11.
RobertsonDWMartinDKSingerPA (2003) Interdisciplinary research: putting the methods under the microscope. BMC Medical Research Methodology3: 20.
12.
ScrippsSGhoshroySBurgessL. (2013) Sharing credit: public historians and scientists reflecting on collaboration. The Public Historian35(2): 46–71.
13.
StevensCLatimerC (1992) A comparison of connectionist models of music recognition and human performance. Minds and Machines2: 379–400.
14.
StevensCGinsborgJLesterG (2011) Backwards and forwards in space and time: recalling dance movement from long-term memory. Memory Studies4(2): 234–250.
15.
StevensCMallochSHaszard MorrisR. (2002) Shaped time: a dynamical systems analysis of contemporary dance. In: StevensCBurnhamDMcPhersonG. (eds) Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Music Perception & Cognition. Adelaide, SA, Australia: Causal Productions, pp. 161–164.
16.
StevensCMallochSMcKechnieS. (2003) Choreographic cognition: the time-course and phenomenology of creating a dance. Pragmatics and Cognition11(2): 297–326.
17.
StevensCSchubertEHaszard MorrisR. (2009) Cognition and the temporal arts: investigating audience response to dance using PDAs that record continuous data during live performance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies67(9): 800–813.