This study introduces Visual Conflict Moralization (VCM), a typology explaining how news organizations embed moral cues in the visual and narrative architecture of conflict reporting to shape audience perceptions on digital platforms. Drawing on Moral Foundations Theory (MFT), framing theory, and platform affordances, the authors analyze 736 video journalism artifacts from six global outlets covering the Israel–Gaza war (October 2023–April 2025). Care/Harm and Sanctity/Degradation were most prevalent, while Fairness/Cheating and Loyalty/Betrayal, though rarer, drove higher engagement. Narration and visual richness enhanced engagement; text-heavy formats mitigated it. They also propose two new moral dimensions, extending MFT for conflict contexts. By centering coverage of the Israel–Gaza war, their analysis foregrounds disparities in visual representation, especially of human experiences. This article offers a replicable model for multimodal analysis in digital journalism, and provides theoretical and practical guidance for ethical, engagement-driven visual communication across platforms, with implications for both scholarly critique and newsroom practice.
AbbasLElhosaryM (2025) Digitized narratives on# MahsaAmini: Constructing a digital transnational feminist movement on TikTok. Women’s Studies in Communication48(1): 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2024.2431332
2.
AbbasLFahmySS (2025) Mobilizing for justice: How moral violation drives collective action on TikTok – insights from an online experiment. In: Paper presented for the Activism, Communication, and Social Justice (ACSJ) Interest Group at the ICA annual convention. Denver, CO.
3.
AbbasLFahmySSAyadS, et al. (2022) TikTok intifada: Analyzing social media activism among youth. Online Media and Global Communication1(2): 287–314. https://doi.org/10.1515/omgc-2022-0014
BennettWLWellsCFreelonD (2011) Communicating civic engagement: Contrasting models of citizenship in the youth web sphere. Journal of Communication61(5): 835–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01588.x
BradyWJWillsJAJostJT, et al. (2017) Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117(28): 16211–16212. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618923114
9.
BuhejiM (2025) War on Gaza: The long-term spillover effects that yet to be realised. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation6(3): 1635–1645.
10.
CasasAWilliamsNW (2019) Images that matter: Online protests and the mobilizing role of pictures. Political Research Quarterly72(2): 360–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918786805
ChengZLiY (2024) Like, comment, and share on TikTok: Exploring the effect of sentiment and second-person view on the user engagement with TikTok news videos. Social Science Computer Review42(1): 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393231178603
13.
CohenJ (1968) Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin70(4): 213. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0026256
14.
ColemanR (2010) Framing the pictures in our heads: Exploring the framing and agenda-setting effects of visual images. In D’AngeloPKuypersJA (eds) Doing News Framing Analysis. Routledge, pp.249–278.
15.
CotterK (2021) ‘Shadowbanning is not a thing’: Black box gaslighting and the power to independently know and credibly critique algorithms. Information, Communication & Society26(6): 1226–1243. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1994624
DhaneshGSRahmanN (2021) Visual communication and public relations: Visual frame building strategies in war and conflict stories. Public Relations Review47(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.102003
18.
ElShabassyAKElhosaryMFahmySS, et al. (2025) Picturing refugees in Western Media: A comparative study of middle Eastern and European refugees on Twitter. Journal of Communication Inquiry49(4): 461–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/01968599251340349
FahmySS (ed.) (2019) Media, Terrorismand Society:Perspectives and Trendsin the Digital Age. Routledge.
21.
FahmySBockMWantaW (2014) Visual Communication Theory and Research: A Mass Communication Perspective. Springer.
22.
FahmySSAbbasLElShabassyAK (2025) TikToking the Israel–Gaza War: A content analysis of peace and war narratives in audiovisual news. Digital Journalism: 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2025.2574931.
23.
FeinbergMWillerR (2019) Moral reframing: A technique for effective and persuasive communication across political divides. Social and Personality Psychology Compass13(12): e12501. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12501
24.
FincherKMTetlockPE (2016) Perceptual dehumanization of faces is activated by norm violations and facilitates norm enforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General145(2): 131.
25.
FraihatIHedayaM (2024) Understanding the October 7Th Hamas attack on Israel and the war on Gaza. In: ElkahloutG (ed.) Gaza’s Cycle of Destruction and Rebuilding: Understanding the Actors, Dynamics, and Responses. Springer Nature Switzerland, pp.77–103.
26.
GabrielsKDe BackerCJ (2016) Virtual gossip: How gossip regulates moral life in virtual worlds. Computers in Human Behavior63: 683–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.065
27.
GeiseSBadenC (2015) Putting the image back into the frame: Modeling the linkage between visual communication and frame-processing theory. Communication Theory25(1): 46–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12048
28.
GibsonRZillmannD (2000) Reading between the photographs: The influence of incidental pictorial information on issue perception. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly77(2): 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900007700209
29.
GrahamJHaidtJKolevaS, et al. (2013) Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In DevinePPlantA (eds) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 47. Academic Press, pp.55–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4
HendrickxJVázquez-HerreroJ (2024) Dissecting social media journalism: A comparative study across platforms, outlets and countries. Journalism Studies25(9): 1053–1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2024.2324318
32.
HuangYFahmyS (2013) Picturing a journey of protest or a journey of harmony? Comparing the visual framing of the 2008 olympic torch relay in U.S. vs. Chinese Press. Media, War & Conflict6(3): 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635213495601
33.
HutchersonCAGrossJJ (2011) The moral emotions: A social–functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology100(4): 719. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022408
34.
JewittC (ed.) (2009) The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, Vol. 1. Routledge.
35.
JungblutMZakareviciuteI (2019) Do pictures tell a different story? A multimodal frame analysis of the 2014 Israel–Gaza conflict. Journalism Practice13(2): 206–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1412804
KlugD (2020) “It took me almost 30 minutes to practice this”. Performance and Production Practices in Dance Challenge Videos on TikTok. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2008.13040.
38.
KressGVan LeeuwenT (2020) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. Routledge.
Medina SerranoJCPapakyriakopoulosOHegelichS (2020) Dancing to the partisan beat: A first analysis of political communication on TikTok. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Web Science, July, 257–266. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.05478
42.
MihailovEVoineaCVicăC (2023) Is online moral outrage outrageous? Rethinking the indignation machine. Science and Engineering Ethics29(2): 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-023-00435-3
43.
NeumannRRhodesM (2024) Exploring morality on social media: A fragmented field. Journal of Social Media Research10(1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231166056
OparaEAdalikwuTMETolorunlekeCA (2025) The impact of Tiktok’s fast-paced content on attention span of students. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5096965
47.
PavlikJVDennisEEMerseyRD, et al. (2019) Conducting research on the world’s changing mediascape: Principles and practices. Media and Communication7(1): 189–192. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1982
48.
Peterson-SalahuddinC (2024) News for (me and) you: Exploring the reporting practices of citizen journalists on TikTok. Journalism Studies25(9): 1076–1094https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2293829
SalernoJMPeter-HageneLC (2013) The interactive effect of anger and disgust on moral outrage and judgments. Psychological Science24(10): 2069–2078. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613486988
51.
ScottWA (1955) Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly19: 321–325. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2746450
ShevchenkoI (2022) American social media on the Russia-Ukraine war: A multimodal analysis. Cognition, Communication, Discourse25: 65–79. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2022-25-05
SmithBGGallicanoTD (2015) Terms of engagement: Analyzing public engagement with organizations through social media. Computers in Human Behavior53: 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.060
56.
TorwelV (2015) Moral framing and the development of political conflicts: An analysis of New York Times’ stories in the buildup to the 2003 Iraqi war. Athens Journal of Mass Media and Communications1(4): 257–274. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajmmc.1-4-2
57.
TreemJWLeonardiPM (2013) Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association36(1): 143–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679130
58.
Vázquez-HerreroJNegreira-ReyMCLópez-GarcíaX (2022) Let’s dance the news! How the news media are adapting to the logic of TikTok. Journalism23(8): 1717–1735. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920969092
59.
WaytzAHeafnerJEpleyN (2014) The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology52: 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.005
60.
XuY (2025) The multimodal turn in framing paradigm: A systematic review of visual framing publications during 1979–2023. Annals of the International Communication Association49(2): 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/anncom/wlaf002
61.
YangIZ (2024) Understanding the role of TikTok’s media affordances in promoting sustainable branding strategies. In: 2023 International Conference on Economic Management, Financial Innovation and Public Service (EMFIPS 2023), June, 94–102. Atlantis Press.
62.
YarchiMBoxman-ShabtaiL (2025) The image war moves to TikTok evidence from the May 2021 round of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Digital Journalism13(1): 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2291650
