The US press and foreign policy information,cueing,and the democratic process in the Syrian conflict

Abstract

There were three chemical attacks on Syrian civilians in 2013, 2017, and 2018. In 2013, President Obama proposed military action and it was rejected by Congress. President Trump ordered two airstrikes in 2017 and 2018, without congressional authorization. Investigating news reports and statements issued by the members of the House and Senate show that there were major criticisms among US officials in all three periods. In the month after the three foreign policy declarations (congressional vote in 2013, airstrikes in 2017 and 2018), the US press increased their reliance on US officials and followed the standpoint of powerful domestic officials in criticizing the military intervention policy – whether proposed or in action. They covered a significant amount of criticism in 2013 that officials voted a nay and raised their objections, and marginalized critical standpoints in times of forgoing democratic procedures and powerlessness of representatives to change the policy. This research also demonstrates the increasing role of NGOs and activists in picturing realities in Syria.

Keywords

conflict content analysis indexing mainstream press news sources Syrian conflict

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aday

(2010) Chasing the bad news: An analysis of 2005 Iraq and Afghanistan war coverage on NBC and Fox News channel. Journal of Communication 60(1): 144–164.

Armed conflict in Syria: Overview and US response (2020) Congressional Research Service, 12 February. Available at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RL33487.pdf (accessed 1 August 2021).

Baker

Weisman

(2013) Obama seeks approval by Congress for strike in Syria. New York Times, 31 August. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/01/world/middleeast/syria.html (accessed 1 August 2021).

Bennett

(1990) Toward a theory of press–state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication 40(2): 103–125.

Bennett

(1994) The news about foreign policy. In: Bennett

Paletz

(eds) Taken by Storm: The Media, Public Opinion, and US Foreign Policy in the Gulf War. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 12–42.

Bennett

(1996) An introduction to journalism norms and representations of politics. Political Communication 13(4): 373–384.

Bennett

(2011) News: The Politics of Illusion, 9th edn. New York, NY: Pearson Longman.

Bennett

Lawrence

Livingston

(2007) When the Press Fails: Political Power and the News Media from Iraq to Katrina. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Bennett

Pfetsch

(2018) Rethinking political communication in a time of disrupted public spheres. Journal of Communication 68(2): 243–253.

10.

Browne

(2017) The Times uses forensic mapping to verify a Syrian chemical attack. New York Times, 1 May. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/01/insider/the-times-uses-forensic-mapping-to-verify-a-syrian-chemical-attack.html (accessed 2 June 2024).

11.

Chulov

(2023) Syrian regime found responsible for Douma chemical attack. Guardian, 27 January. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jan/27/syrian-regime-found-responsible-for-douma-chemical-weapons-attack (accessed 1 June 2024).

12.

Cohen

(2015) Presidential Leadership in Public Opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

13.

Collins

(2017) Syria war: Worst man-made disaster since World War II. Aljazeera, 15 March. Available at: https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2017/3/15/syria-war-worst-man-made-disaster-since-world-war-ii (accessed 1 June 2021).

14.

Cook

(2005) Freeing the presses: An introductory essay. In: Cook

(ed.) Freeing the Presses. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press, 1–28.

15.

Coppock

Ekins

Kirby

(2018) The long-lasting effects of newspaper op-eds on public opinion. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 13(1): 59–87.

16.

Day

Golan

(2005) Source and content diversity in op-ed pages: Assessing editorial strategies in the New York Times and the Washington Post. Journalism Studies 6(1): 61–71.

17.

Death by chemicals: The Syrian government’s widespread and systematic use of chemical weapons (2017) Human Rights Watch. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/report/2017/05/01/death-chemicals/syrian-governments-widespread-and-systematic-use-chemical-weapons (accessed 10 January 2020).

18.

Decker

(2018). As US attacks Syria, Congress looks on cautiously and hopes for a quick conclusion. Los Angeles Times, 14 April. Available at: https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-syria-congress-reaction-20180414-story.html (accessed 15 May 2021).

19.

Denham

(2014) Intermedia attribute agenda setting in the New York Times: The case of animal abuse in US horse racing. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 91(1): 17–37.

20.

Dubberley

Koenig

Murray

(eds) (2020) Digital Witness: Using Open Source Information for Human Rights Investigation, Documentation and Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

21.

Entman

(2003) Cascading activation: Contesting the White House’s frame after 9/11. Political Communication 20: 415–432.

22.

Entman

(2004) Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and US Foreign Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

23.

Entman

Usher

(2018) Framing in a fractured democracy: Impacts of digital technology on ideology, power and cascading network activation. Journal of Communication 68: 298–308.

24.

Fröhlich

Jungblut

(2018) Between factoids and facts: The application of ‘evidence’ in NGO strategic communication on war and armed conflict. Media, War & Conflict 11(1): 85–106.

25.

Golan

(2006) Inter-media agenda setting and global news coverage. Journalism Studies 7(2): 323–333.

26.

Golan

Lukito

(2017) Newspaper editorial pages frame China similarly. Newspaper Research Journal 38(2): 215–230.

27.

Gordon

Cooper

Shear

(2017) Dozens of US missiles hit air base in Syria. New York Times, 6 April. Available at: https://archive.is/20170407021217/https:/www.nytimes.com/2017/04/06/world/middleeast/us-said-to-weigh-military-responses-to-syrian-chemical-attack.html?_r=0 (accessed 1 December 2020).

28.

Groshek

(2008) Coverage of the pre-Iraq war debate as a case study of frame indexing. Media, War & Conflict 1(3): 315–338.

29.

Harris

(2018) The Quicksilver War: Syria, Iraq, and the Spiral of Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

30.

Hatchen

Scotton

(2012) The World New Prism: Challenges of Digital Communication, 8th edn. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

31.

Hayes

Guardino

(2013) Influence from Abroad: Foreign Voices, the Media, and US Public Opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

32.

Henry

Tator

(2002) Discourse of Domination: Racial Bias in the Canadian English Language Press. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

33.

Hertog

(2000) Elite press coverage of the 1986 US–Libya conflict: A case study of tactical and strategic critique. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 77: 612–627.

34.

Hincks

(2017) How Congress reacted to Trump’s missile attack on Syria. Time, 7 April. Available at: http://time.com/4730218/syria-missile-attack-donald-trump-congress/ (accessed 1 December 2020).

35.

How did the Syrian civil war start? (2019) The Week, 11 February. Available at: https://www.theweek.co.uk/syrian-civil-war/92938/how-did-the-syrian-civil-war-begin (accessed 1 December 2020).

36.

Kingdon

(2003) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers.

37.

Kovach

Rosenstiel

(2014) The Elements of Journalism: What News People Should Know and the Public Should Expect. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.

38.

Lawrence

(2000) The Politics of Force: Media and the Construction of Police Brutality. Berkeley: University of California Press.

39.

Lawrence

(2010) Researching political news framing: Established ground and new horizons. In: D’Angelo

Kuypers

(eds) Doing News Framing Analysis: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge, 265–285.

40.

Livingston

Bennett

(2003) Gatekeeping, indexing, and live event news: Is technology altering the construction of news? Political Communication 20(4): 363–380.

41.

McCombs

(2005) A look at agenda-setting: Past, present, and future. Journalism Studies 6(4): 543–557.

42.

Mclnnes

(2002) Spectator-Sport War: The West and Contemporary Conflict. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

43.

McPherson

(2016) Source credibility as ‘information subsidy’: Strategies for successful NGO journalism at Mexican human rights NGOs. Journal of Human Rights 15(3): 330–346.

44.

Meyer

Sanger

Michaels

(2017) How do non-governmental organizations influence media coverage of conflict? The case of the Syrian conflict, 2011–2014. Media, War & Conflict 11(1): 149–171.

45.

Nikolaev

Porpora

(2007) Talking war: How elite US newspaper editorials and opinion pieces debated the attack on Iraq. Sociological Focus 40(1): 6–25.

46.

Parlapiano

, et al. (2017) Where top lawmakers stand on Syria: Now and in 2013. New York Times, 7 April. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/04/07/us/politics/congress-quotes-on-syriaairstrikes (accessed 2 December 2020).

47.

Platt

(2014) Citizen journalist playing a crucial role in Syrian war. Time, 9 October. Available at: https://time.com/3481790/syria-journalism-kobani/ (accessed 2 December 2020).

48.

Powers

(2018) NGOs as Newsmakers: The Changing Landscape of International News. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

49.

Richardson

Lancendorfer

(2004) Framing affirmative action: The influence of race on newspaper editorial responses to the University of Michigan cases. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 9(4): 74–94.

50.

Rowlings

Jones

Sheets

(2011) Some dared call it torture: Cultural resonance, Abu Ghraib, and a selectively echoing press. Journal of Communication 61(6): 1043–1061.

51.

Semati

Cassidy

Khanjani

(2021) Iran and the American Media: Press Coverage of the ‘Iran Deal’ in Context. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

52.

Shaheen

(2016) Almost 1,500 killed in chemical weapons attacks in Syria. Guardian, 14 March. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/14/syria-chemical-weapons-attacks-almost-1500-killed-report-united-nations (accessed 1 November 2020).

53.

Slackman

(2011) Syrian troops open fire on protesters in several cities. New York Times, 25 March. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/26/world/middleeast/26syria.html (accessed 1 November 2020).

54.

Socolow

(2010) A profitable public sphere: The creation of the New York Times op-ed page. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 87(2): 281–296.

55.

Sommer

Maycroft

(2008) Influencing public policy: An analysis of published op-eds by academics. Politics & Policy 36(4): 586–613.

56.

Sparre

(2000) Megaphone diplomacy in the Northern Irish peace process. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 6(1): 88–104.

57.

Sullivan

(2013) US public opposes Syria intervention as Obama presses Congress. Reuters, 3 September. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-syria-crisis-usa-idUSBRE97T0NB20130903 (accessed 1 December 2020).

58.

Syria: The story of the conflict (2016) BBC, 11 March. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-26116868

59.

Syria strikes: How Congress reacted (2018) CBS News, 13 April. Available at: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/strike-on-syria-how-us-congress-reacted-today-2018-04-13/ (accessed 1 November 2020).

60.

Taddonio

(2015) ‘The President blinked’: Why Obama changed course on the ‘Red Line’ in Syria. PBS, 25 May. Available at: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/the-president-blinked-why-obama-changed-course-on-the-red-line-in-syria/#:~:text=‘The%20president%20was%20looking%20for,direct%20military%20engagement%20in%20Syria’ (accessed 1 June 2021).

61.

Tarabay

(2018) For many Syrians, the story of the war began with graffiti in Dara’a. CNN, 15 March. Available at: https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/15/middleeast/daraa-syria-seven-years-on-intl/index.html (accessed 15 July 2020).

62.

Tisdall

(2018) The epic failure of our age: How the West let down Syria. The Guardian, 10 February. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/feb/10/epic-failure-of-our-age-how-west-failed-syria (accessed 1 June 2020).

63.

Walter

(2022) How Civil Wars Start and How to Stop Them. New York: Crown.

64.

Weizman

(2017) Forensic Architecture: Violence at the Threshold of Detectability. New York, NY: Zone Books.

65.

Why does the US still have forces in Syria? (2022) Aljazeera, 24 August. Available at: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/8/24/why-does-us-still-forces-syria-explainer (accessed 15 December 2020).

66.

Why is there a war in Syria? (2018) BBC, 7 September. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-35806229 (accessed 15 August 2020).

67.

Woods

(2015) The op-ed sociologist: The Matthew effect in op-ed publication patterns. American Sociologist 46(3): 356–372.

68.

(2013) Framing Occupy Wall Street: A content analysis of New York Times and USA Today. International Journal of Communication 7: 2412–2432.