A comparative analysis of strategic narratives and persuasive language techniques within Iranian and US news media: The study of the joint comprehensive plan of action
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2025
A comparative analysis of strategic narratives and persuasive language techniques within Iranian and US news media: The study of the joint comprehensive plan of action
This study aims to contribute to the understanding of strategic narrative theory and persuasive language techniques in the Middle Eastern context, particularly focusing on the utilization of these aspects in discussions related to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). The research employs both quantitative and qualitative methods to analyze how the JCPOA was depicted in news media from the US and Iran. The findings reveal that both nations positioned themselves as key proponents of the JCPOA, emphasizing their willingness to collaborate through a more conciliatory approach. Notably, these narratives were underpinned by divergent persuasive language techniques, reflecting the intricate and often conflict-prone dynamics of the Middle East.
ArsenaultAHongS-HPriceM (2017) Strategic narratives of the Arab Spring and after. In: MiskimmonA, et al (eds) Forging the World: Strategic Narratives and International Relations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 190–217.
2.
BalaghiS (2013) Silenced histories and sanitized autobiographies: The 1953 CIA coup in Iran. Biography36(1): 71–96.
3.
BeemanWO (2008) The Great Satan vs. the Mad Mullahs: How the United States and Iran Demonize Each Other. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4.
BehnamBZenouzRM (2008) A contrastive critical analysis of Iranian and British newspaper reports on the Iran nuclear power program. In: NørgaardN (ed.) Systemic Functional Linguistics in Use, Vol. 29. Odense: University of Southern Denmark, 199–218.
5.
BehraveshM (2018) State revisionism and ontological (in) security in international politics: The complicated case of Iran and its nuclear behavior. Journal of International Relations and Development21(4): 836–857.
6.
BesovaAACooleySC (2009) Foreign news and public opinion: Attribute agenda-setting theory revisited. Ecquid Novi: African Journalism Studies30(2): 219–242.
7.
BurnsWJ (2019) Assessing the Role of the United States in the World. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (CEIP).
8.
ChoiS-WJamesP (2016) Why does the United States intervene abroad? Democracy, human rights violations, and terrorism. Journal of Conflict Resolution60(5): 899–926.
9.
ChughASharmaA (2012) Unfolding the linguistic features of newspaper advertisements in India. HOW Journal19(1): 157–168.
10.
ConradP (1999) Uses of expertise: Sources, quotes, and voice in the reporting of genetics in the news. Public Understanding of Science8(4): 285.
11.
CorbettE (1990) Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12.
CrilleyR (2015) Seeing strategic narratives?Critical Studies on Security3(3): 331–333.
13.
Da San MartinoG, et al (2020) Prta: A system to support the analysis of propaganda techniques in the news. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, online . Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 287–293.
14.
DorcasB (2011) A stylistic analysis of a selected campaign speech of President Goodluck Jonathan.
15.
EntmanRM (2007) Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication57(1): 163–173.
16.
FahimiradM (2016) The Iran Deal: How the legal implementation of the Deal puts the United States at a disadvantage both economically and in influencing the future of Iran’s business transactions. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business37: 301.
17.
FartousiH (2012) A rhetorical analysis of a daily editorial:‘Wishing Iraq Well’. Advances in Asian Social Science1(2): 197–204.
18.
FerrariF (2007) Metaphor at work in the analysis of political discourse: Investigating a preventive war persuasion strategy. Discourse & Society18(5): 603–625.
19.
FlewTWaisbordS (2015) The ongoing significance of national media systems in the context of media globalization. Media, Culture & Society37(4): 620–636.
20.
FrankDA (2011) Obama’s rhetorical signature: Cosmopolitan civil religion in the presidential inaugural address, January 20, 2009. Rhetoric and Public Affairs14(4): 605–630.
21.
GhanemSSpeicherB (2017) Comparative persuasive styles in Arabic and English: A study of the United Nations General Assembly Debate speeches. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication10(2): 168–182.
22.
GiddensA (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
23.
GorhamBW (1999) Stereotypes in the media: So what?Howard Journal of Communication10(4): 229–247.
24.
HarrisR (1997) A Handbook of Rhetorical Devices. Robert Harris.
25.
Hearns-BranamanJO (2017) Official enemies in commercial and soft power media: Agency and the Iran crisis in the United States, United Kingdom, Chinese, and Iranian news. Journalism Studies18(4): 449–469.
26.
HermanESChomskyN (2002) Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
27.
HinckR (2024) From political unknown to an unwanted incumbent: Comparing media coverage of the 2020 and 2016 US presidential election within nondemocratic media. American Behavioral Scientist68(1): 112–141.
28.
HinckRSCooleySCKluverR (2019) Global Media and Strategic Narratives of Contested Democracy. New York, NY: Routledge.
KhanMH, et al (2019) Muslims’ representation in Donald Trump’s anti-Muslim-Islam statement: A critical discourse analysis. Religions10(2): 115.
31.
KimKH (2014) Examining US news media discourses about North Korea: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society25(2): 221–244.
32.
KluverRCooleySHinckR (2019) Contesting strategic narratives in a global context: The world watches the 2016 U.S. election. International Journal of Press/Politics24(1): 92–114.
33.
KolbeRHBurnettMS (1991) Content-analysis research: An examination of applications with directives for improving research reliability and objectivity. Journal of Consumer Research18(2): 243–250.
34.
KrolikowskiA (2018) Shaking up and making up China: How the party–state compromises and creates ontological security for its subjects. Journal of International Relations and Development21(4): 909–933.
35.
LiuL (2012) Discourse and manipulation: Stories about China in the New York Times. Language & Communication32(3): 249–256.
36.
MiskimmonAO’LoughlinB (2017) Russia’s narratives of global order: Great power legacies in a polycentric world. Politics and Governance5(3): 111–120. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i3.1017 (accessed).
37.
MiskimmonAO’LoughlinBRoselleL (2013) Strategic Narratives: Communication Power and the New World Order. New York, NY: Routledge.
38.
MitzenJ (2006) Ontological security in world politics: State identity and the security dilemma. European Journal of International Relations12(3): 341–370.
39.
MousavianSHToossiS (2017) Assessing US–Iran nuclear engagement. The Washington Quarterly40(3): 65–95.
40.
NajarzadeganSDabaghiAEslami-RasekhA (2017) A critical discourse analysis of Iran and US presidential speeches at the UN: The sociopragmatic functions. Theory and Practice in Language Studies7(9): 764.
41.
NikouSN (2015) Timeline of Iran’s Nuclear Activities. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.
42.
PavelkaJ (2014) The factors affecting the presentation of events and the media coverage of topics in the mass media. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences140: 623–629.
43.
Pennisi di FloristellaAChenX (2023) Strategic narratives of Russia’s war in Ukraine: perspectives from China. Policy Studies, October. DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2023.2276116.
44.
PetersonMA (2003) Anthropology and Mass Communication: Media and Myth in the New Millennium. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
45.
RahimiB (2015) Censorship and the Islamic Republic: Two modes of regulatory measures for media in Iran. The Middle East Journal69(3): 358–378.
46.
RivkinJRyanM (2017) Literary Theory: An Anthology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
47.
RoselleLMiskimmonAO’LoughlinB (2014) Strategic narrative: A new means to understand soft power. Media, War & Conflict7(1): 70–84.
48.
ShokouhiHMoazedR (2017) Linguistic representation of ideological strategies in two Iranian newspapers written in English. Australian Journal of Linguistics37(2): 127–155.
49.
SnowNKamalipourYR (2004) War, Media, and Propaganda: A Global Perspective. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
50.
ZhaoXDongJ (2010) Study on the features of English political euphemism and its social functions. English Language Teaching3(1): 118–121.
