This study addresses the effectiveness of political advertising in an extreme context, during war-time. A self-administered cross-sectional survey was used to collect data during the 2016 parliamentary elections in Syria. Structural equation modelling was utilized to test the hypothetical model and its invariance related to political involvement. The results indicated that beliefs are a four-dimensional structure consisting of information, veracity, sarcasm, and cynicism. Furthermore, war-time perceptions were found to negatively affect attitude towards political advertising via sarcasm among less politically involved voters. Negative attitude was found to be linked to lower levels of veracity among such voters and to higher levels of cynicism for those who are highly involved in politics. Negative attitudes regarding political advertising were found for lowering the chances for watching advertisements, for supporting a candidate, and for willingness to vote. The results also revealed that paying attention to political advertising does not relate to voters’ intention to vote. This study is the first of its kind to empirically validate a conceptual model predicting voters’ turnout behaviour based on voters’ war-time perceptions, beliefs and attitudes regarding political advertising in an authoritarian setting. In addition, this study investigates whether the effects of the proposed model may be moderated by voters’ political involvement.
AlbrechtHSchlumbergerO (2004). ‘Waiting for Godot’: Regime change without democratization in the Middle East. International Political Science Review25(4): 371–392.
Alwatan (2016) Forty one candidates excluded from the elections … Campaigns are remiss of the citizens’ interests …Al-Shaar: Polling stations to be allotted to the citizens of unsafe governates. Available at: http://alwatan.sy/archives/45808 (accessed 27 January 2019).
4.
AlwittLFPrabhakerPR (1992) Functional and belief dimensions of attitudes to television advertising: Implications for copytesting. Journal of Advertising Research32(5): 30–42.
5.
AndersonN (1981) Foundations of Information Integration Theory. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6.
BauerRAGreyserSA (1968) Advertising in American consumer view. Boston, MA: Harvard University-Graduate School of Business Administration-Division of Research.
BeattieKJ (1991) Prospects for democratization in Egypt. American-Arab Affairs36: 31.
9.
BentlerP (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin107: 238–246.
10.
BentlerPMBonettDG (1980) Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin88(3): 588–606.
11.
BentleyM (2016) Syria and the Chemical Weapons Taboo: Exploiting the Forbidden. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
12.
BlaydesL (2008) Authoritarian elections and elite management: Theory and evidence from Egypt. In: Princeton University Conference on Dictatorships Proceedings, April.
13.
BollenKA (1989) Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
14.
BraderT (2005) Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science49(2): 388–405.
15.
BromleyS (1994) Rethinking Middle East Politics. Austin: University of Texas Press.
16.
BrowneMWCudeckR (1992) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological methods & research21(2): 230–258.
DardisFShenFEdwardsH (2008) Effects of negative political advertising on individuals’ cynicism and self-efficacy: The impact of ad type ad message exposures. Mass Communication and Society11(1): 24–42.
23.
EaglyAHChaikenS (1998) Attitude Structure and Function. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
24.
FishbeinMAjzenI (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
FranzMMRidoutTN (2007). Does political advertising persuade?Political Behavior29(4): 465–491.
27.
FridkinKLKenneyPJ (2004) Do negative messages work? The impact of negativity on citizens’ evaluations of candidates. American Politics Research32(5): 570–606.
28.
GamsonW (1992) Talking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
GandhiJ (2008) Political Institutions under Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
GoldsteinKFreedmanP (2002) Campaign advertising and voter turnout: New evidence for a stimulation effect. Journal of Politics64(3): 721–740.
33.
GoodarziJM (2009) Syria and Iran: Diplomatic Alliance and Power Politics in the Middle East. London: IB Tauris.
34.
HinnebuschR (2008) Modern Syrian politics. History Compass6(1): 263–285.
35.
HorstJ (2016) The Psychology Research Companion: From Student Project to Working Life. New York: Routledge.
36.
HuL-TBentlerP (1995) Evaluating model fit. In: HoyleR (ed.) Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
IyengarSPriorM (2002) Giving advertising a bad name? The effect of political ads on commercial advertising. In: NorranderBWilcoxC (eds) Understanding Public. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 43–60.
38.
JinHAnSSimonT (2009). Beliefs of and attitudes toward political advertising: An exploratory investigation. Psychology and Marketing26(6): 551–568.
39.
JohnstonRHagenMGJamiesonKH (2004) The 2000 Presidential Election and the Foundations of Party Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
JöreskogKSörbomD (2015) LISREL 9.20 for Windows (computer software). Skokie, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
41.
KaidLL (1981) Political advertising. In: NimmoDSandersK (eds) Handbook of Political Communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 249–271.
42.
KaidLL (2004) Political advertising. In: KaidL (ed.) Handbook of Political Communication Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 155–202.
43.
KaidLLHoltz-BachaC (1995) Political advertising across cultures. In: KaidLHoltz-BachaC (eds) Political Advertising in Western Democracies: Parties and Candidates on Television. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
KaidLLTedescoJC (1999) Presidential candidate presentation: Videostyle in the 1996 presidential spots. In: KaidLBystromD (eds) The Electronic Election: Perspectives on the 1996 Campaign Communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 209–221.
45.
KellermannK (1984) The negativity effect and its implications for initial interaction. Communication Monographs51(1): 37–55.
46.
KnutsenCHNygårdHMWigT (2017) Autocratic elections: Stabilizing tool or force for change?World Politics69(1): 98–143.
47.
LangdridgeD (2004) Introduction to Research Methods and Data Analysis in Psychology. Harlow: Pearson Education.
48.
LauRRPomperGM (2002) Effectiveness of negative campaigning in US Senate elections. American Journal of Political Science46(1): 47–66.
49.
LavidgeRJSteinerGA (1961) A model for predictive measurements of advertising effectiveness. Journal of marketing25(6): 59–62.
50.
LevitskySWayLA (2010) Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
LittleAT (2012) Elections, fraud, and election monitoring in the shadow of revolution. Quarterly Journal of Political Science7(3): 249–283.
52.
MacCallumRBrowneMSugawaraH (1996) Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods1(2): 130–149.
MahmoudAB (2013) Syrian consumers: Beliefs, attitudes, and behavioral responses to internet advertising. Business: Theory and Practice14(4): 297–307.
55.
MahmoudAB (2015) E-mail advertising in Syria: Assessing beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors. Journal of Promotion Management21(6): 649–665.
56.
MahmoudAB, et al. (2019) Email is evil! Behavioural responses towards permission-based direct email marketing and gender differences. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing.
57.
MahmoudABReiselW (2015) Exploring personal experience of war-time crisis effects on job insecurity in Syria. Psychology of Human Resource Journal13(2): 245–256.
58.
MarcusGNeumanWRMacKuenM (2000) Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
PetersonRA (1994) A meta-analysis of Cronbach’s coefficient alpha. Journal of Consumer Research21: 381–391.
66.
Public Election Law (2016) Syrian Arab News Agency, 25February. Available at: http://sana.sy/?p=342119 (accessed 7 January 2017).
67.
RawwasMYPatzerGLVitellSJ (1998) A cross-cultural investigation of the ethical values of consumers: The potential effect of war and civil disruption. Journal of Business Ethics17(4): 435–448.
68.
SANA (2016a) The Supreme Judicial Committee for Elections announces the results of the People’s Council elections for the second legislative session with a turnout rate of 56.56%. Available at: https://sana.sy/?p=370333 (accessed 27 January 2019).
69.
SANA (2016b) Higher Judicial Committee for Elections announces results of People’s Assembly elections. Available at: https://sana.sy/en/?p=74769 (accessed 27 January 2019).
70.
SathishMPrem KumarVBBharathS (2011) Impacts of online advertising on sales. Journal of Marketing & Communication7(1): 11–17.
71.
SearsDWhitneyR (1973) Political Persuasion. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
72.
ShahDV, et al. (2007) Campaign ads, online messaging, and participation: Extending the communication mediation model. Journal of Communication57(4): 676–703.
73.
SmithPB, et al. (2013) Understanding Social Psychology across Cultures: Engaging with Others in a Changing World. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74.
SmithRESwinyardWR (1988) Cognitive response to advertising and trial: Belief strength, belief confidence and product curiosity. Journal of Advertising17(3): 3–14.
75.
StroudNJ (2008) Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior30(3): 341–366.
76.
TaberCLodgeM (2006) Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science50(3): 755–769.
77.
TanakaJSHubaGJ (1985) A fit index for covariance structure models under arbitrary GLS estimation. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology38: 197–201.
78.
TesslerM (2002) Islam and democracy in the Middle East: The impact of religious orientations on attitudes toward democracy in four Arab countries. Comparative Politics34(3): 337–354.
79.
TharenouPDonohueRCooperB (2007) Management Research Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ValentinoNAHutchingsVLWilliamsD (2004) The impact of political advertising on knowledge, internet information seeking, and candidate preference. Journal of Communication54(2): 337–354.
82.
VavreckL (2007) The exaggerated effects of advertising on turnout: The dangers of self-reports. Quarterly Journal of Political Science2(4): 325–343.
83.
WallerDSPolonskyMJ (1999) Student attitudes towards political advertising and issues: A cross-cultural study. Journal of International Consumer Marketing11(2): 79–98.
84.
WatersJ (2015) Snowball sampling: A cautionary tale involving a study of older drug users. International Journal of Social Research Methodology18(4): 367–380.
