Right-wing extremists and Islamist extremists try to recruit new followers by addressing their national (for instance, German) or religious (Muslim) social identity via online propaganda videos. Two studies examined whether capitalizing on a shared group-membership affects the emotional and cognitive response towards extremist propaganda. In both studies, Germans/non-migrants, Muslim migrants and control participants (N = 235) were confronted with right-wing extremist and Islamist extremist videos. Emotional and cognitive effects of students (Study 1) and apprentices (Study 2) were assessed. Results showed a general negative evaluation of extremist videos. More relevant, in-group propaganda led to more emotional costs in both studies. Yet, the responses varied depending on educational level: students reported more negative emotions and cognitions after in-group directed videos, while apprentices reported more positive emotions and cognitions after in-group directed propaganda. Results are discussed considering negative social identities.
AgroskinDJonasE (2010) Out of control: How and why does perceived lack of control lead to ethnocentrism. Review of Psychology17(2): 79–90.
2.
ArchettiC (2013a) Narrative wars: Understanding terrorism in the era of global interconnectedness. In: MiskimmonA, et al. (eds) Forging the World: Strategic Narratives and International Relations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
3.
ArchettiC (2013b) Understanding Terrorism in the Age of Global Media: A Communication Approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
ArzheimerKCarterE (2006) Political opportunity structures and right wing extremist party success. European Journal of Political Research45: 419–443. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00304.
5.
BainesPR, et al. (2010) The dark side of political marketing: Islamist propaganda, Reversal Theory and British Muslims. European Journal of Marketing44(3/4): 478–495. DOI: 10.1108/03090561011020543.
6.
BaldaufJ, et al. (2011) Zwischen Propaganda und Mimikry. Neonazi- Strategien in sozialen Netzwerken (Between propaganda and mimicry. Neo-nazi strategies in social networks), Amadeu Antonio Stiftung (Berlin). Available at: http://www.netz-gegen-nazis.de/files/Netz gegen Nazis2.0 Internet.pdf (accessed 23 August 2016).
7.
BatesRA (2012) Dancing with wolves: Today’s lone wolf terrorists. Journal of Public and Professional Sociology4(1): 1–14. Available at: http://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/jpps/vol4/iss1/1 (accessed 11 February 2019).
8.
BeckKQuandtT (2011) Terror als Kommunikation? Was Handlungstheorie, Rational Choice-, Netzwerk- und Systemtheorie aus kommunikationswissenschaftlicher Sicht zur Erklärung leisten (Terror as communication? What action theory, rational choice, network and system theory can off). In: QuandtTScheufeleB (eds) Ebenen der Kommunikation (Levels of communication). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 85–110. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-93140-1_4.
9.
BranscombeNRDoosjeB (2004) Collective Guilt: International Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BranscombeNRWannDL (1994) Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Psychology24(6): 641–657. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420240603.
11.
BranscombeNR, et al. (2012) Moving toward or away from a group identity: Different strategies for coping with pervasive discrimination. In: JettenJ, et al. (eds) The Social Cure: Identity, Health and Well-Being. New York: Psychology Press, 115–131.
12.
BrosiusH-BEsserF (1995) Eskalation durch Berichterstattung? Massenmedien und fremdenfeindliche Gewalt [Escalation through media coverage? Mass media and xenophobic violence]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
13.
BurnapPWilliamsML (2015) Cyber hate speech on twitter: An application of machine classification and statistical modeling for policy and decision making. Policy and Internet7(2): 223–242. DOI: 10.1002/poi3.85.
14.
BurnapPWilliamsML (2016) Us and them: Identifying cyber hate on twitter across multiple protected characteristics. EPJ Data Science. Burnap and Williams, 5(11). DOI: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0072-6.
15.
ChatfieldATReddickCGBrajawidagdaU (2015) Tweeting Propaganda, Radicalization and Recruitment: Islamic State Supporters Multi-Sided Twitter Networks. New York: ACM Press.
16.
ClausRLehnertEMüllerY (2010) Was ein rechter Mann ist- Männlichkeit im Rechtsextremismus (What a right man is – manhood in right-wing extremism), ed. LuxemburgR. Stiftung. Berlin: Dietz.
17.
ConwayM (2012) From al-Zarqawi to al-Awlaki: The emergence of the internet as a new form of violent radical milieu. CTX: Combating Terrorism Exchange 2(4). Available at: http://doras.dcu.ie/17596/2/PUBLISHED_VERSION%20%283%29.pdf (accessed 11 February 2019).
18.
CostelloM, et al. (2016) Who views online extremism? Individual attributes leading to exposure. Computers in Human Behavior63: 311–320. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.033.
19.
DoosjeB, et al. (1998) Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology75(4): 872–886. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.4.872.
DuckJM (1995) The perceived impact of the mass media: Reconsidering the third person effect. European Journal of Social Psychology25: 77–93. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420250107.
22.
EllemersNSpearsRDoosjeB (2002) Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology53: 161–86. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135228.
23.
EriksenTH (2002) Ethnicity and Nationalism. London: Pluto Press (EXIT Germany).
24.
Europol (2011) EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report. European Police Office. DOI: 10.2813/14705.
25.
FinsnesC (2010) What is audio-visual Jihadi propaganda?Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI). Available at: http://www.ffi.no/no/Rapporter/10-00960.pdf (accessed 11 February 2019).
26.
FrankenbergerP, et al. (2015) Islamismus im Internet. Propaganda - Verstöße - Gegenstrategien (Islamism on the internet. Propaganda - violations - counter-strategies), Jugendschutz.net (Mainz).
FrischlichL, et al. (2015) Dying the right way? Interest in an perceived persuasiveness of parochial extremist propaganda increases after mortality salience. Frontiers in Psychology6: 1222. DOI: 10.3389./fpsyg.2015.01222.
29.
FrischlichL (2018) Propaganda3: Einblicke in die Inszenierung und Wirkung von Online-Propaganda auf der Makro-Meso-Mikro Ebene (Propaganda3: Insights into the staging and effects of online propaganda at a macro-meso-micro level). In: ZywietzBSachs-HombachK (eds) Fake News und Social Bots – Neue Mechanismen populistischer Propaganda (Fake news and social bots – new mechanisms of populist propaganda). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien VS, p. Aktivismus, 133–170. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-22118-8.
30.
FrischlichLRiegerD (2017) Hass im Netz – Hass im Herzen? Die Wirkung rechtsextremistischer und islamistisch-extremistischer Online Propagandavideos und mögliche Gegenangebote im Netz (Hate on the internet – hate in the hearts? The effects of right-wing extremist and islamist extremists). InMind2. Available at: http://de.in-mind.org/article/hass-im-netz-hass-im-herzen-die-wirkung-rechtsextremistischer-und-islamistisch (accessed 11 February 2019).
31.
GlaserS (2011) Rechtsextremismus online: Aktuelle Entwicklungen und Strategien zur Bekämpfung (Right-wing extremism online: Actual development and strategies for combating). Medien + Erziehung55(5): 1–10.
32.
GunnGRWilsonAE (2011) Acknowledging the skeletons in our closet: The effect of group affirmation on collective guilt, collective shame, and reparatory attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin37(11): 1474–1487. DOI: 10.1177/0146167211413607.
33.
HafezMM (2007) Martyrdom mythology in Iraq: How Jihadists frame suicide terrorism in videos and biographies. Terrorism and Political Violence19(1): 95–115. DOI: 10.1080/09546550601054873.
34.
HarwoodJGilesHPalomaresNA (2005) Intergroup theory and communication processes. In: HarwoodJGilesH (eds) Intergroup Communication Multiple Perspectives. New York, NY: Peter Lang, 1–20.
35.
HoggMA (2006) Social identity. In: BurkePJ (ed.) Contemporary Social Psychological Theories. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 111–137. Available at: http://books.google.com/books?id=8Jzkgbq2vYwC&pgis=1 (accessed 30 April 2014).
36.
HoggMATerryDJWhiteKM (1995) A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with Social Identity Theory. Social Psychology Quaterly58(4): 255–269. DOI: 10.2307/2787127.
37.
HovlandCIWeissW (1951) The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly15(4): 635–650. DOI: 10.1086/266350.
38.
IyengarSSoodGLelkesY (2012) Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly76(3): 405–431. DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfs038.
39.
JacksonLA, et al. (1996) Achieving positive social identity: Social mobility, social creativity, and permeability of group boundaries. Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes70(2): 241–254. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.241.
40.
JohnsMSchmaderTLickelB (2005) Ashamed to be an American? The role of identification in predicting vicarious shame for anti-Arab prejudice after 9–11. Self and Identity4(4): 331–348. DOI: 10.1080/15298860500145822.
41.
JuergensmeyerM (2003) Terror im Namen Gottes (Terror in the name of God). Freiburg im Breisgau: Verlag Herder.
42.
KemmesiesU (ed.) (2006) Zukunftsaussagen wagen: Zwischen Verstehen und Erklären – methodologische und theoretische Notizen zur Prognoseforschung im Phänomenbereich Extremismus/Terrorismus, Terrorismus und Extremismus – der Zukunft auf der Spur [Daring statements about the future: Between understanding and explaining – methodological and theoretical notes to research predicting developments in extremism and terrorism]. Munich: Luchterhand.
43.
KesslerTHollbachS (2005) Group-based emotions as determinants of ingroup identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology41(6): 677–685. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.01.001.
44.
KlimmtC, et al. (2017) The permanently online and permanently connected mind: Mapping the cognitive structures behind mobile internet use. In: VordererP, et al. (eds) Permanently Online, Permanently Connected. Abingdon: Routledge, 18–28.
45.
KovalP, et al. (2012) Our flaws are more human than yours: Ingroup bias in humanizing negative characteristics. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin38(3): 283–95. DOI: 10.1177/0146167211423777.
46.
KumkaleGTAlbarracínD (2004) The sleeper effect in persuasion: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin130(1): 143–172. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.143.
47.
LeyensJ-P, et al. (2000) The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review4(2): 186–197. DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_06.
48.
LickelB, et al. (2005) Vicarious shame and guilt. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations8(2): 145–157. DOI: 10.1177/1368430205051064.
49.
LützingerS (2010) Die Sicht der Anderen: Eine qualitative Studie zu Biographien von Extremisten und Terroristen (The others’ view: A qualitative study on the biographies of extremists and terrorists). Munich: Bundeskriminalamt/Luchterhand.
50.
MachunskyMMeiserTMummendeyA (2009) On the crucial role of mental ingroup representation for ingroup bias and the ingroup prototypicality-ingroup bias link. Experimental Psychology56(3): 156–164. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.3.156.
51.
MarquesJMYzerbytVYLeyensJ-P (1988) The ‘black sheep effect’: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology18(1): 1–16. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420180102.
52.
MuntonT, et al. (2011) Understanding Vulnerabilty and Resilience in Individuals to the Influence of al Qa’ida Violent Extremism. Croydon: Great Britain Home Office.
53.
National Coordinator for Counterterrorism (2009) Jihadists and the Internet. The Hague: BZ.
54.
NeumannK, et al. (2018) News and Islamist radicalization processes: Investigating Muslims’ perceptions of negative news coverage of Islam. Mass Communication and Society: 1–26. DOI: 10.1080/15205436.2018.1430832.
55.
O’ShaughnessyN (2012) The death and life of propaganda. Journal of Public Affairs12(1): 29–38. DOI: 10.1002/pa.
56.
PettyREWegenerDT (1998) Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables.In: GilbertDT, et al. (eds) The Handbook of Social Psychology Vol. 1, 4th edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 323–390.
57.
PetzelT, et al. (1997) Ein kurzes Instrument zur Messung der Autoritarismus-Neigung (A short instrument for measuring authoritarianism). Gruppendynamik28: 251–258.
58.
RamírezCZVerkuytenM (2011) Values, media framing, and political tolerance for extremist groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology41(7): 1583–1602. DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00775.x.
59.
RammstedtBJohnOP (2007) Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality41(1): 203–212. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001.
60.
RenaudDUnzD (2006) Die M-DAS – eine modifizierte Version der Differentiellen Affekt Skala zur Erfassung von Emotionen bei der Mediennutzung (The M-DAS – a modified version of the differential affect scale to measure emotions in media usage). Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 18(2): 70–75. DOI: 10.1026/1617-6383.18.2.70.
61.
RiegerD, et al. (2013) In cooperation with the Federal Crime Police Office, Institute for Terrorism/Extremism research. Propaganda 2.0: Psychological Effects of Right-wing and Islamic Extremist Internet Videos. Munich, Germany: Luchterhand.
62.
RiegerD, et al. (2017) Propaganda in an insecure, unstructured world: The effects of authoritarianism and uncertainty on the evaluation of right-wing extremist propaganda. Journal for Deradicalization10: 203–229.
63.
RoessingTSiebertS (2006) Perception and assessment of left- and right-wing extremism by public opinion: An experimental study. In: 59th WAPOR Annual Conference Proceedings. Montreal: WAPOR.
64.
RommelspacherB (2002) Anerkennung und Ausgrenzung: Deutschland als Multikulturelle Gesellschaft (Appreciation and exclusion: Germany as a multicultural society. New York: Campus Verlag.
65.
RothMHammelsteinP (2003) Sensation Seeking – Konzeption, Diagnostik und Anwendung (Sensation seeking – Conceptualization, diagnosis and application). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
66.
SagemanM (2008) Leaderless Jihad: Terror Networks in the 21st Century. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
67.
SchmittJB, et al. (2018) Counter-messages as prevention or promotion of extremism?! The potential role of YouTube recommendation algorithms. Journal of Communication68(4): 780–808. DOI: 10.1093/joc/jqy029.
68.
SeoHEbrahimH (2016) Visual propaganda on Facebook: A comparative analysis of Syrian conflicts. Media, War & Conflict9(3): 227–251. DOI: 10.1177/1750635216661648.
69.
SmithERSegerCRMackieDM (2007) Can emotions be truly group level? Evidence regarding four conceptual criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology93(3): 431–46. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.431.
70.
TajfelHTurnerJC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: WorchelSAustinWG (eds) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole, 33–47.
71.
TajfelHTurnerJC (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: WorchelSAustinWG (eds) Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall, 7–24.
72.
TaylorPM (2003) Munitions of the Mind: A History of Propaganda from the Ancient World to the Present Day, 3rd edn.Manchester: Manchester University Press.
73.
TurnerJC, et al. (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
74.
WagnerUChristOKühnelSM (2002) Diskriminierendes Verhalten: Es beginnt mit Abwertungen [Discriminatory behavior: It starts with depreciations]. In: HeitemeyerW (ed.) Deutsche Zustände [German states of affairs]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
75.
ZajoncRB (1968) Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2): 1–28. DOI: 10.1037/h0025848.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
