Can the analysis and dissemination of public opinion polling be organized in such a way as to shift public debate and help reframe an issue that has been strongly influenced by CNN-like mediated activities? Drawing upon polling experience in Darfur, the authors examine this question in the highly disputed context of international conflicts, an area where CNN effects are manifest. They argue that government-sponsored polls can become part of official reactions to the CNN effect in three primary ways: first, deflecting the CNN effect by re-framing narratives and policy options; second, trumping the CNN effect by returning to a form of evidence-based policy making in which research, rather than media pressure, dictates decision making; and third, circumventing the CNN effect by engaging in improved approaches to conflict resolution.
BBC (2004) Survey Finds Hope in Occupied Iraq. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3514504.stm
2.
Canes-Wrone B. ( 2006) Who Leads Whom? Presidents, Policy and the Public . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
Crilly R. ( 2010a) Saving Darfur: Everyone’s Favourite African War . London: Reportage Press.
4.
Crilly R. ( 2010b) Vilified Arabs of Darfur must be included in peace process . Irish Times Online, 16 March. Available at: http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/world/2010/0316/1224266351081.html
5.
Flint J. ( 2010) Rhetoric and Reality: The Failure to Resolve the Darfur Conflict (HSBA Working Paper19). Geneva: Small Arms Survey, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies.
6.
Foyle DC ( 2004) Leading the public to war? The influence of American public opinion on the Bush administration’s decision to go to war in Iraq. International Journal of Public Opinion Research16(3): 269-294.
7.
Gagliardone I. and Stremlau N. ( 2008) Public opinion research in a conflict zone: grassroots diplomacy in Darfur. International Journal of Communication2: 1085-1113.
8.
Gandy OH ( 2003) Public opinion surveys and the formation of privacy policy . Journal of Social Issues59(2): 283-299.
9.
Herbst S. ( 1998) Reading Public Opinion. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
10.
Irwin C. ( 2001) How public opinion polls were used in support of the Northern Ireland peace process. Global Review of Ethnopolitics1(1): 62-73.
11.
Jacobs LR and Shapiro RY ( 2000) Politicians Don’t Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Jansen A. ( 2010) The ethic of refusal: (or) the inability to cope with powerlessness in the face of human tragedy. Social Science Research Council Blogs. Available at: http://blogs.ssrc.org/sudan/2010/02/19/the-ethic-of-refusal/
13.
Langer G. ( 2010) Views improve sharply in Afghanistan, though criticisms of the U.S. stay high. ABC News Online, 11 January. Available at: http://abcnews.go.com/PollingUnit/afghanistan-abc-news-national-survey-poll-show-support/story?id=9511961
14.
Lanz D. ( 2009) Save Darfur: a movement and its discontents. African Affairs. Available at: http://afraf.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/adp061v1
15.
Lijphart A. ( 1984) Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16.
Livingston S. ( 1997) Clarifying the CNN Effect: An Examination of Media Effects According to Type of Military Intervention (Policy Paper No. R-18). Cambridge, MA: The Joan Shorenstein Center, Harvard University John F. Kennedy School of Government.
17.
Livingston S. and Eachus T. ( 1995) Humanitarian crises and U.S. foreign policy: Somalia and the CNN effect reconsidered. Political Communication12(4): 413-429.
18.
Mamdani M. ( 2009) Saviors and Survivors: Darfur, Politics, and the War on Terror. New York: Pantheon .
19.
Marsh C. ( 1985) Back on the bandwagon: the effect of opinion polls on public opinion. British Journal of Political Science15(1): 51-74.
20.
Miller W. and Stokes DE ( 1963) Constituency influence in Congress. American Political Science Review57(1): 45-56.
21.
Mutz DC ( 1992) Impersonal influence: effects of representations of public opinion on political attitudes. Political Behavior14(2): 89-122.
22.
Mutz DC ( 1997) Mechanisms of momentum: does thinking make it so ? Journal of Politics59(1): 104-125.
23.
Newport F. ( 2004) Polling Matters: Why Leaders Must Listen to the Wisdom of the People. New York: Warner Books.
24.
Page BI and Shapiro RY ( 1983) The roles of public opinion research inCanadian government. American Political Science Review77(1): 175-190.
25.
Shaw M. ( 1996) Civil Society and Media in Global Crises. London: Pinter.
26.
Soriano CG and Komarow S. ( 2004) Polls find optimism about what lies ahead. USA Today, 29 April. Available at: http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2004-04-29-iraq-poll_x.htm
27.
Traugott MW ( 2008) The uses and misuses of polls. In: Donsbach W, Traugott MW (eds) The Sage Handbook of Public Opinion Research. London: Sage, 232-239.
28.
Weaver DH ( 2008) Attitudes of journalists toward public opinion research . In: Donsbach W, Traugott MW (eds) The Sage Handbook of Public Opinion Research . London: Sage , 451-458.
