Infertility, particularly among individuals undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF), is commonly accosiated with substantial psychological stress. This study examines interactions in a Chinese online support group (OSG) focused on IVF-related discussions, with particular attention to how textual and emotional features reflect variations across treatment stages and user roles (posters vs. commenters). Using the Chinese Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count Dictionary (CLIWC) 2015 and statistical analysis, we identified 25 significant markers from a dataset of 1.64 million Chinese characters. Notably, personal pronouns in frequency peaked during treatment, with informal language and family-related terms more prevalent before and after. Emotionally, expressions shifted from negative pre-treatment to more positive in later stages. In role-specific practices, posters mainly engage in self-disclosure and help-seeking during treatment, whereas commenters provide empathy and validation in the initial stage. These findings highlight the co-construction of support and identity in Chinese infertility discourse, revealing how online communities facilitate emotional coping and social connectedness throughout IVF treatment cycles.
BarakAGluck-OfriO (2007) Degree and reciprocity of self-disclosure in online forums. Cyberpsychology & Behavior10(3): 407–417.
2.
BarakABoniel-NissimMSulerJ (2008) Fostering empowerment in online support groups. Computers in Human Behavior24(5): 1867–1883.
3.
BergerRPaulMSHenshawLA (2013) Women’s experience of infertility: A multi-systemic perspective. Journal of International Women’s Studies14(1): 54.
4.
BlackburnKGWangWXPedlerR, et al. (2021) Linguistic markers in women’s discussions on miscarriage and abortion illustrate psychological responses to their experiences. Journal of Language and Social Psychology40(3): 398–411.
5.
BoivinJVassenaRCostaM, et al. (2022) Tailored support may reduce mental and relational impact of infertility on infertile patients and partners. Reproductive Biomedicine Online44(6): 1045–1054.
6.
ChungCPennebakerJW (2007) The psychological functions of function words. In: FiedlerK (ed.) Social Communication. Psychology Press, pp.343–359.
7.
CohnMAMehlMRPennebakerJW (2004) Linguistic markers of psychological change surrounding September 11, 2001. Psychological Science15(10): 687–693.
8.
CookRJDickensBM (2014) Reducing stigma in reproductive health. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics125(1): 89–92.
9.
CozbyPC (1973) Self-disclosure: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin79(2): 73–91.
10.
DerlagaVJBergJH (1987) Self-Disclosure: Theory, Research, and Therapy. Plenum Press.
11.
DonkorESSandallJ (2009) Coping strategies of women seeking infertility treatment in Southern Ghana. African Journal of Reproductive Health13(4): 81–94.
12.
ErčuljVIŽibernaA (2021) The role of online social support in patients undergoing infertility treatment: A comparison of pregnant and non-pregnant members. Health Communication37(14): 1724–1730.
13.
ErčuljVIŽibernaAGlobevnik VelikonjaV (2019) Exploring online social support among infertility treatment patients: A text-mining approach. Information Research24(1): paper 807.
14.
GalhardoACunhaMPinto-GouveiaJ, et al. (2013) The mediator role of emotion regulation processes on infertility-related stress. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings20(4): 497–507.
HarveyK (2012) Disclosures of depression: Using corpus linguistics methods to examine young people’s online health concerns. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics17(3): 349–379.
17.
HaynesW (2013) Bonferroni correction. In: DubitzkyWWolkenhauerOYokotaH, et al. (eds) Encyclopedia of Systems Biology. Springer New York, p. 154.
18.
HintonLKurinczukJJZieblandS (2010) Infertility; isolation and the internet: A qualitative interview study. Patient Education and Counseling81(3): 436–441.
19.
IrelandMEMehlMR (2014) Natural language use as a marker of personality. In: HoltgravesTM (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Language and Social Psychology. Oxford University Press, pp.201–218.
20.
JansenNASaint OngeJM (2015) An internet forum analysis of stigma power perceptions among women seeking fertility treatment in the United States. Social Science & Medicine147: 184–189.
21.
JingXYGuWXuXL, et al. (2022) Stigma predicting fertility quality of life among Chinese infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology43(1): 35–41.
22.
KacewiczEPennebakerJWDavisM, et al. (2014) Pronoun use reflects standings in social hierarchies. Journal of Language and Social Psychology33(2): 125–143.
23.
KianiZSimbarMHajianS, et al. (2021) The prevalence of depression symptoms among infertile women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility Research and Practice7(1): 1–6.
24.
KimCWangHC (2022) From receivers to givers: Understanding practice of reciprocity in an online support community. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction6(CSCW1): 1–17.
25.
LeeGLHui ChoiWHChanCHY, et al. (2009) Life after unsuccessful IVF treatment in an assisted reproduction unit: A qualitative analysis of gains through loss among Chinese persons in Hong Kong. Human Reproduction (Oxford)24(8): 1920–1929.
26.
LeeM (2017) Don’t give up! A cyber-ethnography and discourse analysis of an online infertility patient forum. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry41(3): 341–367.
27.
LinTCHsuJSCChengHL, et al. (2015) Exploring the relationship between receiving and offering online social support: A dual social support model. Information & Management52(3): 371–383.
28.
LinWFHuangCLLinYC, et al. (2020) The revision of the Chinese linguistic inquiry and word count dictionary 2015. Survey Research – Method and Application (45): 73–118.
29.
MahajanNNTurnbullDADaviesMJ, et al. (2010) Changes in affect and state anxiety across an in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle. Fertility and Sterility93(2): 517–526.
30.
MalikSHCoulsonNS (2008) Computer-mediated infertility support groups: An exploratory study of online experiences. Patient Education and Counseling73(1): 105–113.
31.
McDonaldDWoodward-KronR (2016) Member roles and identities in online support groups: Perspectives from corpus and systemic functional linguistics. Discourse & Communication10(2): 157–175.
32.
NewmanMLPennebakerJWBerryDS, et al. (2003) Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin29(5): 665–675.
33.
NiYHuangLMTongCY, et al. (2021) Analysis of the levels of hope and influencing factors in infertile women with first-time and repeated IVF-ET cycles. Reproductive Health18(1): 1–200.
34.
O’connellSBLGelgootENGrunbergPH, et al. (2021) ‘I felt less alone knowing I could contribute to the forum’: Psychological distress and use of an online infertility peer support forum. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine9(1): 128–148.
35.
PanWFengBSkye WingateV (2018) What you say is what you get: How self-disclosure in support seeking affects language use in support provision in online support forums. Journal of Language and Social Psychology37(1): 3–27.
36.
PanWShenCFengB (2017) You get what you give: Understanding reply reciprocity and social capital in online health support forums. Journal of Health Communication22(1): 45–52.
37.
PennebakerJWBoothRBoydR, et al. (2015) The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015. University of Texas at Austin.
38.
PennebakerJWChungCKFrazeeJ, et al. (2014) When small words foretell academic success: The case of college admissions essays. PLoS ONE9(12): e115844.
39.
PennebakerJWMehlMRNiederhofferKG (2003) Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology54(1): 547–577.
40.
R Core Team (2021) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
41.
RamezanzadehFAghssaMMAbediniaN, et al. (2004) A survey of relationship between anxiety, depression and duration of infertility. BMC Women’s Health4(9): 1–9.
42.
RooneyKLDomarAD (2018) The relationship between stress and infertility. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience20(1): 41–47.
43.
SireyJABruceMLAlexopoulosGS, et al. (2001) Perceived stigma as a predictor of treatment discontinuation in young and older outpatients with depression. American Journal of Psychiatry158(3): 479–481.
44.
SongDLiXYangM, et al. (2021) Fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) among Chinese women undergoing frozen embryo transfer. BMC Women’s Health21(1): 177.
45.
SormunenTKarlgrenKAanesenA, et al. (2020) The role of social media for persons affected by infertility. BMC Women’s Health20(1): 112.
46.
SormunenTWesterbotnMAanesenA, et al. (2021) Social media in the infertile community—Using a text analysis tool to identify the topics of discussion on the multitude of infertility blogs. Women’s Health17: 1–9.
47.
SternkeEAAbrahamsonK (2015) Perceptions of women with infertility on stigma and disability. Sexuality and Disability33(1): 3–17.
48.
SulerJ (2004) The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior7(3): 321–326.
49.
TausczikYRPennebakerJW (2010) The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology29(1): 24–54.
50.
WhiteMDormanSM (2001) Receiving social support online: Implications for health education. Health Education Research16(6): 693–707.
51.
WhitefordLMGonzalezL (1995) Stigma: The hidden burden of infertility. Social Science & Medicine40(1): 27–36.
XueHLiaoWZhangJ (2024) Interaction dynamics of social support expressions predict future support-seeking behaviors in online support groups. Computers in Human Behavior156: 108224.
54.
YaoHChanCHYChanCLW (2018) Childbearing importance: A qualitative study of women with infertility in China. Research in Nursing & Health41(1): 69–77.
55.
Yeshua-KatzD (2018) Childless in an IVF-nation: Online stigma-coping strategies in support groups for childless Israeli women. Information, Communication & Society21(10): 1436–1452.
56.
ZhangFLvYWangYT, et al. (2021) The social stigma of infertile women in Zhejiang Province, China: A questionnaire-based study. BMC Women’s Health21(1): 97.
