Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Keywords

Chatbots conversation analysis conversational AI ethnomethodology human-computer interaction LLMs

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albert

Hall

(2024) Distributed agency in smart homecare interactions: A conversation analytic case study. Discourse and Communication 18(6): 892–904.

Albert

Pearl

Stokoe

(2023) Should Conversational User Interfaces Have a Personality? Conversation Design Institute. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OegIMvaYT6U (accessed July 2023).

Antaki

(ed.) (2011) Applied Conversation Analysis. Intervention and Change in Institutional Talk. London: Palgrave.

Atkins

(2019) Assessing health professionals’ communication through role-play: An interactional analysis of simulated versus actual general practice consultations. Discourse Studies 21: 109–134.

Bender

Gebru

McMillan-Major

, et al (2021) On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, pp.610–623. New York, NY: ACM Press.

Brandt

Hazel

McKinnon

, et al. (2024) Educating Dora: Teaching a conversational agent to talk. Discourse and Communication 18(6): 905–916.

Buschmeier

(2018) Attentive speaking. From listener feedback to interactive adaptation. PhD Thesis. Bielefeld University, Bielefeld.

Clark

(1996) Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cooney

Reece

(2024). NaturalTurn: A method to segment transcripts into naturalistic conversational turns. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.15615.

10.

De Rijk

Breukelman

Dalmaijer

, et al (2024) ‘This uh. . . young lady young man’: Gender attribution in the context of a gender ambiguous robot. Discourse and Communication 18(6): 965–976.

11.

Edwards

(1997) Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.

12.

Eisenmann

Mlynář

Turowetz

, et al (2023) “Machine down”: Making sense of human–computer interaction – Garfinkel’s research on ELIZA and LYRIC from 1967 to 1969 and its contemporary relevance. AI & SOCIETY. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-023-01793-z

13.

Flinkfeldt

Parslow

Stokoe

(2022) How categorization impacts the design of requests: Asking for email addresses in call-centre interactions. Language in Society 51: 693–716.

14.

Garfinkel

(1963) A conception of and experiments with “trust” as a condition of concerted stable actions. In: O’Brien

(ed.) The Production of Reality: Essays and Readings on Social Interaction. New York, NY: Ronald Press, pp.379–390.

15.

Garfinkel

(2021) Ethnomethodological misreading of Aron Gurwitsch on the phenomenal field. Human Studies 44: 19–42.

16.

Heritage

(2002) Ad hoc inquiries: Two preferences in the design of routine questions in an open context. In: Maynard

Houtkoop-Steenstra

Schaeffer

, et al (eds) Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York, NY: Wiley, pp.313–334.

17.

Heritage

(2012) Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social interaction 45(1): 1–29.

18.

Housley

Dahl

(2024) Membership categorisation, sociological description and role prompt engineering with Chat GPT. Discourse and Communication 18(6): 848–858.

19.

Houtkoop-Steenstra

(1995) Meeting both ends: Standardization and recipient design in telephone survey interviews. In: ten Have

Psathas

(eds) Situated Order: Studies in Social Organization and Embodied Activities. Washington, DC: University Press of America, pp.91–106.

20.

Hunter

(2018) 10 Things to Fix in Your Conversational App UX Right Now. Medium. Available at: https://medium.com/@designoutloud/11cee93ab959

21.

Jefferson

(1989) Letter to the editor Re: Anita Pomerantz’ epilogue to the special issue on sequential organization of conversational activities. Western Journal of Speech Communication 53(4): 427–429.

22.

Klowait

Erofeeva

Lenke

, et al (2024). Can AI explain AI? Interactive co-construction of explanations among human and artificial agents. Discourse and Communication 18(6): 917–930.

23.

König

(2019) Sequential patterns in SMS and WhatsApp dialogues: Practices for coordinating actions and managing topics. Discourse & Communication 13(6): 612–629.

24.

Kopp

Krämer

(2021) Revisiting human-agent communication: The importance of joint co-construction and understanding mental states. Frontiers in Psychology 12: 580955.

25.

Liesenfeld

Dingemanse

(2024) Interactive probes: Towards action-level evaluation for dialogue systems. Discourse and Communication 18(6): 954–964.

26.

Meredith

(2014). Chatting online: Comparing spoken and online written interaction between friends. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Loughborough University, Loughborough.

27.

Moore

Arar

(2019) Conversational UX Design: A Practitioner’s Guide to the Natural Conversation Framework. New York, NY: Association for COmputing Machinery.

28.

Pütz

Esposito

(2024) Performance without understanding: How ChatGPT relies on humans to repair conversational trouble. Discourse and Communication 18(6): 859–868.

29.

Reineke

Helmer

(2024) User practices in dealing with trouble in interactions with virtual assistants in German: Repeating, altering, and insisting. Discourse and Communication 18(6): 942–953.

30.

Relieu

(2024) How Lenny the bot convinces you that he is a person: Storytelling, affiliations and alignments in multi-unit turns. Discourse and Communication 18(6): 882–891.

31.

Richardson

Stokoe

Antaki

(2019) Establishing intellectually impaired victims’ understanding about ‘truth’ and ‘lies’: Police interview guidance and practice in cases of sexual assault. Applied Linguistics 40: 773–792.

32.

Rudaz

Licoppe

(2024) “Playing the robot’s advocate”: Bystanders’ descriptions of a robot’s conduct in public settings. Discourse and Communication 18(6): 869–881.

33.

Sacks

(1984) On doing “being ordinary”. In: Atkinson

(ed.) Structures of Social Action. Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.413–429.

34.

Sacks

(1987) On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In: Button

Lee

JRE

(eds) Talk and Social Organization London: Routledge, pp.54–69.

35.

Sacks

Schegloff

Jefferson

(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735.

36.

Schegloff

(1995) Discourse as an interactional achievement III: The omnirelevance of action. Research on Language and Social Interaction 28: 185–211.

37.

Schegloff

(2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

38.

Schlangen

Skantze

(2011) A general, abstract model of incremental dialogue processing. Dialogue and Discourse 2: 83–111.

39.

Schlesinger

Edwards

Grinter

(2017) Intersectional HCI: Engaging identity through gender, race, and class. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Denver, CO, USA, pp.5412–5427.

40.

Stivers

Robinson

(2006) A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society 35: 367–392.

41.

Stokoe

(2018) Talk: The Science of Conversation. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

42.

Stokoe

(2021). What Does It Mean to Be Conversational? Deployed. Available at: https://www.deployed.co/blog/what-does-it-mean-to-be-conversational

43.

Stokoe

Albert

Parslow

, et al (2021) Conversation Analysis and Conversation Design: Where the Moonshots Are. Medium. Available at: https://elizabeth-stokoe.medium.com/c2a2836cb042

44.

Stokoe

Sikveland

Albert

, et al (2020) Can humans simulate talking like other humans? Comparing simulated clients to real customers in service inquiries. Discourse Studies 22: 87–109.

45.

Stommel

te Molder

(2015) Counseling online and over the phone: When preclosing questions fail as a closing device. Research on Language and Social Interaction 48: 281–300.

46.

Tisserand

Baldauf-Quilliatre

(2024) Rejecting a robot’s offer: An analysis of preference. Discourse and Communication 18(6): 931–941.

47.

Whitehead

Stokoe

Raymond

(2025) Categories in Social Interaction. London: Routledge.

48.

Yin

Alba

Nicoletti

(2024) OpenAI GPT Sorts Resume Names with Racial Bias, Test Shows. Bloomberg. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2024-openai-gpt-hiring-racial-discrimination/

Conversation analysis and conversational technologies: Finding the common ground between academia and industry

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References