Conversation analysis and conversational technologies: Finding the common ground between academia and industry

Albert S Hall L (2024) Distributed agency in smart homecare interactions: A conversation analytic case study. Discourse and Communication 18(6): 892–904.

Albert S Pearl C Stokoe E (2023) Should Conversational User Interfaces Have a Personality? Conversation Design Institute. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OegIMvaYT6U (accessed July 2023).

Antaki C (ed.) (2011) Applied Conversation Analysis. Intervention and Change in Institutional Talk. London: Palgrave.

Atkins S (2019) Assessing health professionals’ communication through role-play: An interactional analysis of simulated versus actual general practice consultations. Discourse Studies 21: 109–134.

Bender EM Gebru T McMillan-Major A , et al (2021) On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, pp.610–623. New York, NY: ACM Press.

Brandt A Hazel S McKinnon R , et al. (2024) Educating Dora: Teaching a conversational agent to talk. Discourse and Communication 18(6): 905–916.

Buschmeier H (2018) Attentive speaking. From listener feedback to interactive adaptation. PhD Thesis. Bielefeld University, Bielefeld.

Clark HH (1996) Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cooney G Reece A (2024). NaturalTurn: A method to segment transcripts into naturalistic conversational turns. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.15615.

De Rijk L Breukelman M Dalmaijer E , et al (2024) ‘This uh. . . young lady young man’: Gender attribution in the context of a gender ambiguous robot. Discourse and Communication 18(6): 965–976.

Edwards D (1997) Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.

Eisenmann C Mlynář J Turowetz J , et al (2023) “Machine down”: Making sense of human–computer interaction – Garfinkel’s research on ELIZA and LYRIC from 1967 to 1969 and its contemporary relevance. AI & SOCIETY. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-023-01793-z

Flinkfeldt M Parslow S Stokoe E (2022) How categorization impacts the design of requests: Asking for email addresses in call-centre interactions. Language in Society 51: 693–716.

Garfinkel H (1963) A conception of and experiments with “trust” as a condition of concerted stable actions. In: O’Brien J (ed.) The Production of Reality: Essays and Readings on Social Interaction. New York, NY: Ronald Press, pp.379–390.

Garfinkel H (2021) Ethnomethodological misreading of Aron Gurwitsch on the phenomenal field. Human Studies 44: 19–42.

Heritage J (2002) Ad hoc inquiries: Two preferences in the design of routine questions in an open context. In: Maynard DW Houtkoop-Steenstra H Schaeffer NC , et al (eds) Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York, NY: Wiley, pp.313–334.

Heritage J (2012) Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social interaction 45(1): 1–29.

Housley W Dahl P (2024) Membership categorisation, sociological description and role prompt engineering with Chat GPT. Discourse and Communication 18(6): 848–858.

Houtkoop-Steenstra H (1995) Meeting both ends: Standardization and recipient design in telephone survey interviews. In: ten Have P Psathas G (eds) Situated Order: Studies in Social Organization and Embodied Activities. Washington, DC: University Press of America, pp.91–106.

Hunter P (2018) 10 Things to Fix in Your Conversational App UX Right Now. Medium. Available at: https://medium.com/@designoutloud/11cee93ab959

Jefferson G (1989) Letter to the editor Re: Anita Pomerantz’ epilogue to the special issue on sequential organization of conversational activities. Western Journal of Speech Communication 53(4): 427–429.

Klowait N Erofeeva M Lenke M , et al (2024). Can AI explain AI? Interactive co-construction of explanations among human and artificial agents. Discourse and Communication 18(6): 917–930.

König K (2019) Sequential patterns in SMS and WhatsApp dialogues: Practices for coordinating actions and managing topics. Discourse & Communication 13(6): 612–629.

Kopp S Krämer N (2021) Revisiting human-agent communication: The importance of joint co-construction and understanding mental states. Frontiers in Psychology 12: 580955.

Liesenfeld A Dingemanse M (2024) Interactive probes: Towards action-level evaluation for dialogue systems. Discourse and Communication 18(6): 954–964.

Meredith J (2014). Chatting online: Comparing spoken and online written interaction between friends. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Loughborough University, Loughborough.

Moore RJ Arar R (2019) Conversational UX Design: A Practitioner’s Guide to the Natural Conversation Framework. New York, NY: Association for COmputing Machinery.

Pütz O Esposito E (2024) Performance without understanding: How ChatGPT relies on humans to repair conversational trouble. Discourse and Communication 18(6): 859–868.

Reineke S Helmer S (2024) User practices in dealing with trouble in interactions with virtual assistants in German: Repeating, altering, and insisting. Discourse and Communication 18(6): 942–953.

Relieu M (2024) How Lenny the bot convinces you that he is a person: Storytelling, affiliations and alignments in multi-unit turns. Discourse and Communication 18(6): 882–891.

Richardson E Stokoe E Antaki C (2019) Establishing intellectually impaired victims’ understanding about ‘truth’ and ‘lies’: Police interview guidance and practice in cases of sexual assault. Applied Linguistics 40: 773–792.

Rudaz D Licoppe C (2024) “Playing the robot’s advocate”: Bystanders’ descriptions of a robot’s conduct in public settings. Discourse and Communication 18(6): 869–881.

Sacks H (1984) On doing “being ordinary”. In: Atkinson JM (ed.) Structures of Social Action. Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.413–429.

Sacks H (1987) On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In: Button G Lee JRE (eds) Talk and Social Organization London: Routledge, pp.54–69.

Sacks H Schegloff EA Jefferson G (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735.

Schegloff EA (1995) Discourse as an interactional achievement III: The omnirelevance of action. Research on Language and Social Interaction 28: 185–211.

Schegloff EA (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schlangen D Skantze G (2011) A general, abstract model of incremental dialogue processing. Dialogue and Discourse 2: 83–111.

Schlesinger A Edwards WK Grinter RE (2017) Intersectional HCI: Engaging identity through gender, race, and class. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Denver, CO, USA, pp.5412–5427.

Stivers T Robinson JD (2006) A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society 35: 367–392.

Stokoe E (2018) Talk: The Science of Conversation. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

Stokoe E (2021). What Does It Mean to Be Conversational? Deployed. Available at: https://www.deployed.co/blog/what-does-it-mean-to-be-conversational

Stokoe E Albert S Parslow S , et al (2021) Conversation Analysis and Conversation Design: Where the Moonshots Are. Medium. Available at: https://elizabeth-stokoe.medium.com/c2a2836cb042

Stokoe E Sikveland RO Albert S , et al (2020) Can humans simulate talking like other humans? Comparing simulated clients to real customers in service inquiries. Discourse Studies 22: 87–109.

Stommel W te Molder H (2015) Counseling online and over the phone: When preclosing questions fail as a closing device. Research on Language and Social Interaction 48: 281–300.

Tisserand L Baldauf-Quilliatre H (2024) Rejecting a robot’s offer: An analysis of preference. Discourse and Communication 18(6): 931–941.

Whitehead K Stokoe E Raymond G (2025) Categories in Social Interaction. London: Routledge.

Yin L Alba D Nicoletti L (2024) OpenAI GPT Sorts Resume Names with Racial Bias, Test Shows. Bloomberg. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2024-openai-gpt-hiring-racial-discrimination/