WITHDRAWN—Administrative Duplicate Publication: User practices in dealing with trouble in interactions with virtual assistants in German: Repeating,altering and insisting

Abstract

Keywords

Conditional voice recorder (CVR)conversation analysis human-machine interaction repair repetitions smart speakers

Due to an administrative error, the articles below were accidentally published Online First and in Volume 18 Issue 6 with different DOIs. The Online First versions have been withdrawn.

The correct and citable versions of the articles remain:

1. Evanhoe, R. (2024). Observing and designing signals of agency. Discourse & Communication, 18(6), 992-993. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813241267054

2. Adeniyi, O. (2024). Evaluating conversational technologies: Beyond satisfaction ratings. Discourse & Communication, 18(6), 996-997. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813241267106

3. Relieu, M. (2024). How Lenny the bot convinces you that he is a person: Storytelling, affiliations, and alignments in multi-unit turns. Discourse & Communication, 18(6), 882-891. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813241271437

4. Reineke, S., & Helmer, H. (2024). User practices in dealing with trouble in interactions with virtual assistants in German: Repeating, altering and insisting. Discourse & Communication, 18(6), 942-953. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813241271494

5. Clark, L. (2024). An agent in people’s clothing. Discourse & Communication, 18(6), 983-984. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813241267111

References

Barthel

Helmer

Reineke

(2023) First users’ interactions with voice-controlled virtual assistants: A micro-longitudinal corpus study. In: Proceedings of the 27th workshop on the semantics and pragmatics of dialogue (eds Lücking

Mazzocconi

Verdonik

), Maribor, Slovenia, pp.105–117. Maribor: University of Maribor.

Curl

(2005) Practices in other-initiated repair resolution: The phonetic differentiation of ‘repetitions’. Discourse Processes 39(1): 1–43.

Deppermann

(2024) Meta-semantic practices in social interaction. Definitions and specifications provided in response to Was heißt X (‘what does X mean’). Interactional Linguistics 3(1–2): 13–39.

Dingemanse

Roberts

Baranova

, et al. (2015) Universal principles in the repair of communication problems. PLoS One 10(9): e0136100.

Fischer

Reeves

Porcheron

, et al. (2019) Progressivity for voice interface design. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on conversational user interfaces (ed Cowan

), Dublin, Ireland, 22–23 August 2019, pp.1–8. New York, NY: ACM Press.

Fox

Benjamin

Mazeland

(2012) Conversation analysis and repair organization: Overview. In Chapelle

(ed.) The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Chichester: Wiley, pp.1094–1097.

Helmer

(2020) How do speakers define the meaning of expressions? The case of German x heißt y (“x means y”). Discourse Processes 57(3): 278–299.

Kendrick

(2015) Other-initiated repair in English. Open Linguistics 1: 164–190.

Krummheuer

(2008) Zwischen den Welten. Verstehenssicherung und Problembehandlung in künstlichen Interaktionen von menschlichen Akteuren und personifizierten virtuellen Agenten. In: Willems

(ed.) Weltweite Welten: Internet-Figurationen aus wissenssoziologischer Perspektive. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp.269–294.

10.

Parslow

(2024) Evolving repair strategies and recipient design: Practical implications for conversational technologies. Commentary. In: Albert

Buschmeier

Stokoe

, et al (eds) Special Issue on “Conversation analysis and conversational technologies”. Discourse and Communication 18(6).

11.

Pelikan

HRM

Broth

(2016) Why that Nao? How humans adapt to a conventional humanoid robot in taking turns-at-talk. In: Proceedings of the 2016 conference on human factors in computing systems, San Jose, CA, USA, 7–12 May 2016, pp.4921–4932. New York, NY: ACM Press.

12.

Porcheron

Fischer

Reeves

, et al. (2018) Voice interfaces in everyday life. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (ed Mandryk

), Montreal, QC, Canada, 21–26 April 2018, pp.1–12. New York, NY: ACM Press.

13.

Raudaskoski

(1990) Repair work in human-computer interaction. In: Luff

Gilbert

Frohlich

(eds) Computers and Conversation. London: Academic Press, pp.151–172.

14.

Reeves

Porcheron

Fischer

(2018) ‘This is not what we wanted’: Designing for conversation with voice interfaces. Interactions 26(1): 46–51.

15.

Robinson

Kevoe-Feldman

(2010) Using full repeats to initiate repair on others’ questions. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43(3): 232–259.

16.

Schegloff

(1987) Some sources of misunderstanding in talk-in-interaction. Linguistics 25: 201–218.

17.

Schegloff

(1992) Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. The American Journal of Sociology 97(5): 1295–1345.

18.

Schegloff

(2000) When ‘others’ initiate repair. Applied Linguistics 21(2): 205–243.

19.

Schegloff

Jefferson

Sacks

(1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53(2): 361–382.

20.

Selting

Auer

Barth-Weingarten

, et al. (2011) A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT2. Translated and adapted for English by Couper-Kuhlen

Barth-Weingarten

Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 12: 1–51.

21.

Stommel

de Rijk

Boumans

(2022) “Pepper, what do you mean?” Miscommunication and repair in robot-led survey interaction. In: Proceedings of the 31st IEEE international conference on robot and human interactive communication, Napoli, Italy, 29 August 20 22–1 September 2022, pp.385–392. New York, NY: IEEE.