The Scottish independence referendum in 2014 saw the breakthrough of online political campaigning in the UK. Despite the outcome, research and media alike concluded that the main pro-independence campaign, Yes Scotland (YS), outdid the main pro-union campaign, Better Together (BT), in the online battle. This article addresses this discrepancy by exploring how YS and BT used social media affordances in order to legitimize their own and de-legitimize their opponents’ positions. The material consists of multimodal tweets published by YS and BT in the run-up to the referendum. The article employs a model for multimodal legitimation that takes into consideration the construction of authority, moral evaluation and the construction and justifications of means and goals. The findings show that both campaigns made extensive use of de-legitimating strategies, although YS was more balanced. The article also shows that the campaigns’ communicative choices had implications for the construction and justification of goals and means, with YS running a more visionary campaign than BT.
BaxterGMarcellaR (2012) Does Scotland ‘like’ this? Social media use by political parties and candidates in Scotland during the 2010 general election campaign. Libri62(2): 109–124.
2.
BaxterGMarcellaR (2013) Do online election campaigns sway the vote? A study of the 2011 Scottish parliamentary election. Libri63(3): 190–205.
3.
BaxterGMarcellaRVarfisE (2011) The use of the internet by political parties and candidates in Scotland during the 2010 UK general election campaign. Aslib Proceedings63(5): 464–483.
4.
BaxterGMarcellaRChapmanD, et al. (2013) Voters’ information behaviour when using political actors’ websites during the 2011 Scottish Parliament election campaign. Aslib Proceedings65(5): 515–533.
5.
BeasleyRKaarboJSolomon-StraussH (2016) To be or not to be a state? Role contestation in the debate over Scottish independence. In: CantirCKaarboJ (eds) Domestic Role Contestation, Foreign Policy, and International Relations. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 140–156.
6.
BelamM (2014) Scottish independence: the “Yes” campaign are dominating the social media battle. Mirror, 17September.
7.
BellDEiserD (2017) Public finance and taxation. In: KeatingM (ed) Debating Scotland: Issues of Independence and Union in the 2014 Referendum. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 15–64.
8.
BoswellC (2009) The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge: Immigration Policy and Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BremnerS (2015) The Early Days of a Better Nation: Or how we Laid the Foundation for the Campaign that Will Win an Independent Scotland. Edinburgh: Imagined Images Editions.
EngströmR (2014) The online visual group formation of the far right: a cognitive-historical case study of the British National Party. Public Journal of Semiotics6(1): 1–21.
14.
EngströmR (2016) The Scottish independence referendum and the myth of successful small states. Linguistics and the Human Sciences12(1): 47–66.
15.
EngströmR (2018) The (dis)continuation of Scottish nationalism: a discursive comparison of the Scottish National Party and National Collective. Journal of Political Ideologies23(1): 97–115.
16.
ForcevilleCJ (1996) Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London and New York: Routledge.
17.
ForcevilleCJUrios-AparisiE (2009) Introduction. In: ForcevilleCJUrios-AparisiE (eds) Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 3–18.
18.
FreedenM (1996) Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
19.
HassanG (2014) State of independence: the rise of ‘third Scotland’. Soundings: A Journal of Politics and Culture57(57): 61–72.
20.
HellströmA (2016) Trust Us: Reproducing the Nation and the Scandinavian Nationalist Populist Parties. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
21.
JohnsRMitchellJ (2016) Takeover: Explaining the Extraordinary Rise of the SNP. London: Biteback Publishing.
22.
KeatingMHarveyM (2014) Small Countries in a Big World: What Scotland Can Learn. Edinburgh: Luath Press.
23.
KeatingMMcEwenN (2017) The Scottish independence debate. In: KeatingM (ed) Debating Scotland: Issues of Independence and Union in the 2014 Referendum. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–26.
24.
KühneltJ (2008) State legitimacy and the role of morality: an introduction. In KühneltJ (ed) Political Legitimization Without Morality?Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1–12.
25.
LipsetS (1960) Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. London: Heinemann.
26.
MachinDvan LeeuwenT (2016) Multimodality, politics and ideology. Journal of Language and Politics15(3): 243–258.
MahoneyJFeltwellTAjuruchiO, et al. (2016) Constructing the visual online political self: an analysis of Instagram use by the Scottish electorate. In: KayeJDruinALampeC, et al. (eds) Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, pp. 3339–3351.
29.
MansbridgeJ (2015) Resisting resistance. In: CelikatesRKreideRWescheT (eds) Transformations of Democracy: Crisis, Protest and Legitimation. London: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 147–158.
30.
McEwenN (2017) Welfare: Contesting communities of solidarity. In: KeatingM (ed) Debating Scotland: Issues of Independence and Union in the 2014 Independence Referendum. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 84–101.
31.
NorrisP (2005) Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
PageRBartonDUngerJW, et al. (2014) Researching Language and Social Media: A Student Guide. London: Routledge.
33.
PikeJ (2015) Project Fear: How an Unlikely Alliance Left a Kingdom United but a Country Divided. London: Biteback Publishing.
34.
SturkenMCartwrightL (2009) Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
