In this article, we examine patterns of negotiation in multi-party decision making in social work. We draw on Strauss’ theory of negotiated order and a discourse analytical approach, seeking to gain insight into the complex accomplishment of making a decision in an inter-professional and multi-party setting. Working with data from 97 team meetings in a social work setting, we identify two patterns of negotiation in talk: expanding and postponing. ‘Expanding’ covers a group of interactional actions involving turn-taking and closure, while ‘postponing’ includes a group of actions whereby assessments or topics are avoided or made irrelevant. Both are examples of the complex ways in which team members negotiate both the institutional order and the decision to be made in the specific case in situ.
AngouriJ (2012) Managing disagreement in problem solving meeting talk. Journal of Pragmatics44(12): 1565–1579.
2.
AngouriJBargiela-ChiappiniF (2011) ‘So what problems bother you and you are not speeding up your work?’ Problem solving talk at work. Discourse & Communication5(3): 209–229.
3.
BaraldiC (2013) Forms of decision making: Gatekeeping and dialogic coordination in CISV organizational meetings. Journal of Business Communication50(4): 339–361.
4.
BodenD (1994) The Business of Talk: Organizations in Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
5.
DrewPHeritageJ (1992) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
FineGA (1984) Negotiated orders and organizational cultures. Annual Review of Sociology10(1): 239–262.
7.
GriffithsL (1997) Accomplishing team: Teamwork and categorisation in two community mental health teams. Sociological Review45(1): 59–78.
8.
GriffithsL (2001) Categorising to exclude: The discursive construction of cases in community mental health teams. Sociology of Health & Illness23(5): 678–700.
9.
GumperzJ (1999) On interactional sociolinguistic method. In: SarangiSRobertsC (eds) Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 453–473.
10.
HalvorsenK (2010) Team decision making in the workplace: A systematic review of discourse analytic studies. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice7(3): 273–296.
11.
HalvorsenKSarangiS (2015) Team decision-making in workplace meetings: The interplay of activity roles and discourse roles. Journal of Pragmatics76: 1–14.
12.
HeritageJ (1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In: Maxwell AtkinsonJHeritageJ (eds) Structures of Social Action Studies in Conversation Analysis. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 299–344.
13.
HirvonenP (2013) Positioning in an inter-professional team meeting: Examining positioning theory as a methodological tool for micro-cultural group studies. Qualitative Sociology Review9(4): 100–114.
14.
HuismanM (2001) Decision-making in meetings as talk-in-interaction. International Studies of Management & Organization31(3): 69–90.
15.
JuhilaKCaswellDRaitakariS (2013) Resistance. In: HallCJuhilaKMatareseM (eds) Analysing Social Work Communication: Discourse in Practice. Florence: Routledge, pp. 117–135.
16.
KangasharjuH (2002) Alignment in disagreement: Forming oppositional alliances in committee meetings. Journal of Pragmatics34: 1447–1471.
17.
KwonIClarkeRWodakR (2009) Organizational decision-making, discourse, and power: Integrating across contexts and scales. Discourse & Communication3(3): 273–302.
18.
Mäkitalo SäljöÅR (2002) Talk in institutional context and institutional context in talk. Text & Talk22(1): 57–82.
19.
MehanH (1983) The role of language and the language of role in institutional decision making. Language in Society12(2): 187–211.
20.
MondadaL (2013) Embodied and spatial resources for turn-taking in institutional multi-party interactions: Participatory democracy debates. Journal of Pragmatics46(1): 39–68.
21.
NathanMLMitroffII (1991) The use of negotiated order theory as a tool for the analysis and development on an interorganizational field. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science27(2): 163–180.
22.
NguyenHT (2011) Boundary and alignment in multiparty conflict talk. Journal of Pragmatics43(6): 1755–1771.
23.
ParadisEReevesS (2013) Key trends in interprofessional research: A macrosociological analysis from 1970 to 2010. Journal of Interprofessional Care27(2): 113–122.
24.
PomerantzADenvirP (2007) Enacting the institutional role of chairperson in upper management meetings: The interactional realization of provisional authority. In: CoorenF (ed.) Interacting and Organizing: Analyses of a Management Meeting. London: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 31–52.
25.
SacksHSchegloffEAJeffersonG (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50(4): 696–735.
26.
SarangiS (2016) Editorial: Team work and team talk as distributed and coordinated action in healthcare delivery. Communication and Medicine13(1): 1–7.
27.
SarangiSRobertsC (1999) Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
