Historical and existential coherence in political commercials

Abstract

This article analyzes discourse, narrative, and video editing to introduce the concept of ‘historical coherence’. This concept is an expansion of Alessandro Duranti’s notion of ‘existential coherence’ – the construction of an embodied narrative connecting a candidate’s past with his or her decision to run for office – from his 2006 study of a candidate’s campaign speeches. This study examines how language and communication are linked with historical narratives through the use of multimodal stories in which US political commercials link candidates’ present actions with historical events, dynamics, artifacts, and/or figures. This ‘historical coherence’ is constructed through the following strategies: (1) constructing a narrative in which popular historical figures or archetypal figures are in agreement with the candidate; (2) preempting charges of lack of historical coherence; and (3) presenting historical restrictions to freedom and casting the candidate, or the candidate’s party, in general, as a preventative from future calamities and transgressions to freedom.

Keywords

Discourse analysis existential coherence historical coherence multimodality narrative coherence political commercials super PACs video analysis transcription

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

(2011) ‘Rhymes with Blunt’: Pornification and U.S. political culture. Rhetoric & Public Affairs 14(2): 327–368.

Barber for Congress (2010a) Gather Your Armies: Rick Barber for Congress, 13 June. Available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iQ7ZDUutU4 (accessed 20 October 2011).

Barber for Congress (2010b) Slavery: Rick Barber for Congress, 27 June. Available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kn14RwuJJRg (accessed 20 October 2011).

Barthes

([1957] 1972) Mythologies. New York: HarperCollins.

Barty-King

(1988) The Drum: A Royal Tournament Tribute to the Military Drum. London: Royal Tournament.

Brown

Levinson

(1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cameron

(2015) Ette-ymology. Language: A feminist guide, 15 August. Available at: https://debuk.wordpress.com/2015/08/16/ette-ymology/ (accessed 20 August 2015).

Confessore

Lichtblau

(2015) ‘Campaigns’ aren’t necessarily campaigns in the age of ‘Super PACs.’ The New York Times, 17 May. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/18/us/politics/super-pacs-are-remaking-16-campaigns-official-or-not.html?_r=0 (accessed 20 August 2015).

Corrigan

(2011) A Short Guide to Writing about Film. New York: Longman.

10.

Daughton

(1994) Women’s issues, women’s place: Gendered related problems in presidential campaigns. Communication Quarterly 42(2): 106–119. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01463379409369920

11.

Duranti

(2006) Narrating the political self in a campaign for US Congress. Language in Society 35(4): 467–497.

12.

Eckholm

(2011) Using history to mold ideas on the right. The New York Times, 4 May. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/05/us/politics/05barton.html

13.

Eisenstein

(1949) Film Form: Essays in Film Theory. New York: Harcourt.

14.

Fairclough

(1998) Media Discourse. New York: Bloomsbury.

15.

Foner

(2010) The Fiery Trial: Abraham Lincoln and American Slavery. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

16.

Goffman

(1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing.

17.

Goldenberg

(2015) Clinton returns to smash glass ceiling, with gender at forefront of campaign. The Guardian, 15 April. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/apr/12/hillary-clinton-2016-presidential-campaign-strategy-politics

18.

Goodwin

(2007) Language, culture, social organization and the material word: Why a five field approach is necessary. Teaching Anthropology: Society for Anthropology in Community College Notes 13: 5–9.

19.

Graham

(2015) Super PACs are for republicans, campaign cash is for democrats. The Atlantic. Available at: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/super-pacs-are-for-republicans-campaign-cash-is-for-democrats/398759/ (accessed 30 July 2015).

20.

Gramsci

([1971] 2010) Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.

21.

Kaid

(2006) Political advertising in the United States. In: Kaid

Holtz-Bacha

(eds) The SAGE Handbook of Political Advertising. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 37–61.

22.

Kaid

Davidson

(1986) Elements of videostyle: Candidate presentation through television advertising. In: Kaid

Nimmo

Sanders

(eds) New Perspectives on Political Advertising. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois Press, pp. 184–209.

23.

Kress

(2009) What is mode? In: Jewitt

(ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. New York: Routledge, pp. 184–209.

24.

Kress

Van Leeuwen

(2001) Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Edward Arnold.

25.

Labaree

(1979) The Boston Tea Party. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.

26.

Lakoff

(2006) Whose Freedom? The Battle over America’s Most Important Idea. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

27.

Lewis

(1955) The American Adam: Innocence, Tragedy, and Tradition in the Nineteenth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

28.

Milbank

(2008) A thank-you for 18 million cracks in the glass ceiling. The Washington Post, 8 June. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/07/AR2008060701879.html

29.

Moskovitz

(2006) The cultural myth of the cowboy, or, how the West was won. Americana: The Journal of American Popular Culture, 1900 to the Present 5(1). Available at: lture.com/journal/articles/spring_2006/moskowitz.htm

30.

Norris

(2004) Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. New York: Routledge.

31.

Rucker

(2015) Clinton: ‘Crack every glass ceiling’. The Washington Post, 24 February. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/hillary-clinton-previews-2016-says-its-time-to-crack-every-last-glass-ceiling/2015/02/24/c5d262c2-bc45-11e4-8668-4e7ba8439ca6_story.html

32.

Sacks

Schegloff

Jefferson

(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735.

33.

Silverstein

(2011) The ‘message’ in the (political) battle. Language & Communication 31(3): 203–216.

34.

Stand with Hillary (2014, November 16). Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJJoJWY1VFM (accessed 2 May 2017).

35.

Taylor

(1991) The dialogical self. In: Hiley

Bohrman

Shusterman

(eds) The Interpretive Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 304–314.

36.

Unsworth

Cléirigh

(2009) Multimodality and reading: The construction of meaning through image–text interaction. In: Jewitt

(ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. New York: Routledge, pp. 151–163.

37.

Van Dijk

(1980) Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London: Longman.

38.

Van Dijk

(1997) What is political discourse analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics 11(1): 11–52.

39.

Vesnic-Alujevic

(2011) Communicating with voters by blogs? Campaigning for the 2009 European Parliament elections. Discourse & Communication 5(4): 413–428.

40.

Wekesa

(2012) Cartoons can talk? Visual analysis of cartoons on the 2007/2008 post-election violence in Kenya: A visual argumentation approach. Discourse & Communication 6(1): 223–238.