As leadership discourses in higher education are increasingly being mediated online, texts previously reserved for staff are now being made available in the public domain. As such, these texts become accessible for study, critique and evaluation. Additionally, discourses previously confined to the written domain are now increasingly multimodal. Thus, an approach is required that is capable of relating detailed, complex multimodal discourse analyses to broader sociocultural perspectives to account for the complex meaning-making practices that operate in online leadership discourses. For this purpose, a digital multimodal discourse approach is proposed and illustrated via a small-scale case study of the online leadership discourse of an Australian university. The analysis of two short video texts demonstrates how a digital multimodal discourse perspective facilitates the identification of key multimodal systems used for meaning-making in online communication, how meaning arises through combinations of semiotic choices (not individual choices), and how the results of multimodal discourse analysis using digital technology can reveal larger sociocultural patterns – in this case, divergent leadership styles and approaches as reflected in online discourse, at a time of immense change within the higher education sector.
BatemanJ (2014) Looking for what counts in film analysis: A programme of empirical research. In: MachinD (ed.) Visual Communication. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 301–329.
2.
BatemanJSchmidtKH (2011) Multimodal Film Analysis: How Films Mean. London; New York: Routledge.
3.
BlaschkeSFrostJHattkeF (2014) Towards a micro foundation of leadership, governance, and management in universities. Higher Education68(5): 711–732. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-014-9740-2.
4.
BordwellDThompsonK (2012) Film Art: An Introduction, 10th edn.New York: McGraw-Hill.
5.
BrymanA (2007) Effective leadership in higher education: A literature review. Studies in Higher Education32(6): 693–710. DOI: 10.1080/03075070701685114.
6.
BurnesBWendPByRT (2013) The changing face of English universities: Reinventing collegiality for the twenty-first century. Studies in Higher Education39(6): 905–926. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2012.75485.
7.
CoatesHDobsonIRGoedegebuureLMeekL (2010) Across the Great Divide: What do Australian Academics think of University Leadership? Advice from the CAP Survey. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management32(4): 379–387. DOI: 10.1080/1360080x.2010.491111.
8.
CoorenFKuhnTCornelissenJP. (2011) Communication, organizing and organization: An overview and introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies32(9): 1149–1170. DOI: 10.1177/0170840611410836.
9.
FaircloughN (2005) Discourse analysis in organization studies: The case for critical realism. Organization Studies26(6): 915–939.
10.
FullanMScottG (2009) Turnaround Leadership for Higher Education. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
11.
HallidayMAK (1978) Language as Social Semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
12.
HallidayMAK (1985) Spoken and Written Language. Waurn Ponds, VIC, Australia: Deakin University Press.
13.
HallidayMAKGreavesWS (2008) Intonation in the Grammar of English. London: Equinox.
14.
HallidayMAKHasanR (1985) Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective. Waurn Ponds, VIC, Australia: Deakin University.
15.
HallidayMAKMatthiessenCMIM (2013) An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn.London: Arnold.
16.
IedemaR (2001) Analysing film and television: A social semiotic account of Hospital: An unhealthy business. In: Van LeeuwenTJewittC (eds) Handbook of Visual Analysis. London; Thousand Oaks, CA; New Delhi, India: SAGE, pp. 183–204.
JewittC (ed.) (2014) The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, 2nd edn.London: Routledge.
19.
KressGVan LeeuwenT (2006 [1996]) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, 2nd edn.London: Routledge.
20.
KuhnT (2012) Negotiating the micro-macro divide: Thought leadership from organizational communication for theorizing organization. Management Communication Quarterly26(4): 543–584. DOI: 10.1177/0893318912462004.
21.
LemkeJL (2002) Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication1(3): 299–325.
22.
MachinD (2007) Introduction to Multimodal Analysis. London: Hodder Arnold; New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
MachinD (2013) What is multimodal critical discourse studies?Critical Discourse Studies10(4): 347–355.
24.
MachinDMayrA (2012) How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: SAGE.
25.
MachinDRichardsonJE (2012) Discourses of unity and purpose in the sounds of fascist music: A multimodal approach. Critical Discourse Studies9(4): 329–345.
26.
MarginsonS (2010) How universities have been positioned as teams in a knowledge economy world cup. In: BlackmoreJBrennanMZipinL (eds) Re-positioning University Governance and Academic Work. Dordrecht: Sense Publishers, pp. 17–34.
27.
MartinJRWhitePRR (2005) The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
MerskyRR (2008) Lost in transition: The use of role objects in today’s postmodern organizations. Organisational and Social Dynamics8(1): 97–112.
29.
MiddlehurstREltonL (1992) Leadership and management in higher education. Studies in Higher Education17(3): 251–264. DOI: 10.1080/03075079212331382527.
30.
MonteiroPNicoliniD (2015) Recovering materiality in institutional work: Prizes as an assemblage of human and material entities. Journal of Management Inquiry24(1): 61–81.
O’HalloranKL (2011) Multimodal discourse analysis. In: HylandKPaltridgeB (eds) Companion to Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum, pp. 120–137.
33.
O’HalloranKLTanSSmithBA. (2011) Multimodal analysis within an interactive software environment: Critical discourse perspectives. Critical Discourse Studies8(2): 109–125.
34.
O’MullaneM (2011) University Leadership: Approaches, Formation and Challenges in Europe. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
35.
O’TooleM (2011 [1994]) The Language of Displayed Art, 2nd edn.London; New York: Routledge.
36.
ScottGBellSCoatesH. (2010) Australian higher education leaders in times of change: The role of Pro Vice-Chancellor and Deputy Vice-Chancellor. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management32(4): 401–418.
37.
TapperTPalfreymanD (2010) The Collegial Tradition in the Age of Mass Higher Education. Dordrecht: Springer.
38.
TaylorJR (2011) Organization as an (imbricated) configuring of transaction. Organization Studies32(9): 1273–1294.
39.
TaylorJRRobichaudD (2004) Finding the organization in the communication: Discourse as action and sensemaking. Organization11(3): 395–413.
40.
Van DijkTA (2001) Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In: WodakRMeyerM (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE, pp. 95–120.
41.
Van LeeuwenT (1999) Speech, Music, Sound. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
42.
Van LeeuwenT (2005) Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.
43.
Van LeeuwenT (2008) Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
44.
Van LeeuwenT (2012) The critical analysis of musical discourse. Critical Discourse Studies9(4): 319–328.
