Discursive construction and transformation of ‘us’ and ‘them’ categories in the newspaper coverage on the US anti-ballistic missile system: Polish versus Russian view

Abstract

The present study explores discursive constructions of us- and them-groups within the context of the debates on the placement of the US anti-ballistic missile defence system in Central and Eastern Europe. The study is based on the data collected by the authors in the Polish and Russian press (2008–2009). Using the framework that is informed by Critical Discourse Analysis and Membership Categorization Analysis, the authors define strategies and specific linguistic means used to represent ‘us’ and ‘them’ and provide a picture of chronological transformations that these representations undergo in the investigated newspapers.

Keywords

Critical discourse analysis membership categorization Polish and Russian newspapers them-group US anti-ballistic missile system us-group

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bauman

(1999) Culture as Praxis, 2nd edn. London: SAGE.

Bazhenova

Lapcheva

(2003) Оппозиция свой-чужой в политическом дискурсе [Opposition ‘in-group member’ vs ‘stranger’ in political discourse]. In: Современная политическая лингвистика: материалы международной научной конференции [Modern Political Linguistics: International Scientific Conference Proceedings]. Екатеринбург: Уральский государственный педагогический университет [Ekaterinburg: The Ural State Pedagogical University], pp. 16–18.

Cap

(2006) Legitimization in Political Discourse: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.

Chilton

(2004) Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.

Collet

(2009) Civilization and civilized in post-9/11 US presidential speeches. Discourse & Society 20(4): 455–475.

Davies

(2008) Oppositions in news discourse: The ideological construction of us and them in the British press. PhD thesis, University of Huddersfield, UK.

De Saussure

(2005) Manipulation and cognitive pragmatics. Preliminary hypotheses. In: de Saussure

Schulz

(eds) Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 113–145.

Dubrovskaya

Sowińska

(2011) Дискурсивные средства репрезентации России, Польши и США в контексте дискуссии о размещении американской ПРО в Европе (на материале российской и польской прессы) [Discursive means of representation of Russia, Poland and the USA in the context of debates on the American anti-ballistic missile placement in Europe (based on Russian and Polish press)]. In: Современная политическая лингвистика: тезисы международной научной конференции [Modern Political Linguistics: International Scientific Conference Proceedings]. Екатеринбург: Уральский государственный педагогический университет [Ekaterinburg: The Ural State Pedagogical University], pp. 97–99.

Duszak

(ed.) (2002) Us and Others: Social Identities across Languages, Discourses and Cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

10.

Duszak

(2011) Othering with (im)politeness. In: Gonerko-Frej

Sokół

Witkowska

Zagratzki

(eds) Us and Them – Them and Us: Constructions of the Other in Cultural Stereotypes – Perceptions, Challenges, Meanings. Aachen: Shaker Verlag, pp. 377–396.

11.

Freiberg

Freebody

(2009) Applying membership categorization analysis to discourse: When the ‘tripwire’ critique is not enough. In: Lê

Lê

Short

(eds) Critical Discourse Analysis: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. New York: Nova Science Publishers, pp. 49–64.

12.

Gansler

(2010) Ballistic missile defense: Past and future. National Defense University, Center for Technology and National Security Policy, Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.ndu.edu/CTNSP/docUploaded/BMD_2010.pdf. (accessed 20 December 2011).

13.

Harding

(2006) Historical representations of aboriginal people in the Canadian news media. Discourse & Society 17(2): 205–235.

14.

Hart

(2010) Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

15.

Hester

Eglin

(1997) Culture in Action. Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis/University Press of America.

16.

Hongladarom

(2002) Discourse about them: Construction of ethnic identities in Thai print media. In: Duszak

(ed.) Us and Others: Social Identities across Languages, Discourses and Cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 321–339.

17.

Horvat

Verschueren

Žagar

IŽ

(2001) The Rhetoric of Refugee Policies in Slovenia: The Pragmatics of Legitimation. Ljubljana: Mirovni Inštitut.

18.

Hynek

Stritecky

(2010) The rise and fall of the third site of ballistic missile defense. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 43: 179–187.

19.

Hynek

Stritecky

Handl

Kořan

(2009) The US–Russian security ‘reset’: Implications for Central and Eastern Europe and Germany. European Security 18(3): 263–285. Available at: http://www.princeton.edu/europe/-events_archive/repository/Hynek-et-al.-European-Security-after-publ..pdf (accessed 30 July 2011).

20.

Khmeltsov

(2004) Когда «они» говорят о «нас»: политический дискурс-анализ и семиотика внешней политики в междисциплинарной перспективе [When ‘they’ speak about ‘us’: Political discourse analysis and semiotics of foreign policy in the interdisciplinary perspective]. In: Актуальные проблемы теории коммуникации [Topical Issues in Communication Theory]. СПб: Изд-во СПбГПУ [St Petersburg: St Petersburg State Pedagogical University], pp. 59–71.

21.

Klushina

(2007) Образ врага (о военной риторике в мирное время) [Representation of the enemy (on war rhetoric in the time of peace)]. In: Язык современной публицистики [The Language of Modern Mass Media]. Москва: Флинта [Moscow: Flinta], pp. 144–161.

22.

Kolosov

(2004) Манипулятивные стратегии дискурса ненависти [Manipulative strategies of hatred discourse]. Критика и семиотика [Critics and Semiotics] 7: 248–256.

23.

Kunze

Bonet

(2008) Rosyjskie reakcje na planowane w Europie wschodniej bazy wojskowe [Russian reactions towards planned military bases in Eastern Europe]. In: Raabe

(ed.) Amerykańska tarcza antyrakietowa w Europie [American Anti-missile Shield in Europe]. Warsaw: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, pp. 57–73.

24.

Leudar

Marsland

Nekvapil

(2004) On membership categorization: ‘Us’, ‘them’ and ‘doing violence’ in political discourse. Discourse & Society 15(2–3): 243–266.

25.

Mansson

(2008) Bauman on strangers – Unwanted peculiarities. In: Jacobsen

Poder

(eds) The Sociology of Zygmunt Bauman: Challenges and Critique. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, pp. 155–171.

26.

MFA (2008) Signing of the agreement regarding the placement in Poland of anti-ballistic defensive missile interceptors as well as the adoption of a Polish–US declaration of strategic cooperation. Available at: www.msz.gov.pl/Signing,of,the,agreement,regarding,the,placement,in,Poland,of,antiballistic,defensive,missile,interceptors,as,well,as,the,adoption,of,a,Polish-US,declaration,of,strategic,cooperation,20784.html (accessed 28 July 2011).

27.

Molek-Kozakowska

(2011) The evil empire returns? A critical analysis of stereotypes of Russia in British and American press coverage of the Georgian crisis. In: Gonerko-Frej

Sokół

Witkowska

Zagratzki

(eds) Us and Them – Them and Us: Constructions of the Other in Cultural Stereotypes – Perceptions, Challenges, Meanings. Aachen: Shaker Verlag, pp. 473–490.

28.

Moon

(2007) Us and them: Discourse and social power in the making of collective selves. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, New York City, 11 August. Available at: www.allacademic.com/meta/p178011_index.html (accessed 28 December 2011).

29.

Moravcsik

(2007) ‘Europe’s anti-ballistic missile defence. Newsweek International, 29 April. Available at: www.princeton.edu/~amoravcs/library/-ABM.doc (accessed 20 December 2011).

30.

Oddo

(2011) War legitimation discourse: Representing ‘us’ and ‘them in four presidential addresses. Discourse & Society 22: 287–314.

31.

Reisigl

Wodak

(2001) Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism and Anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.

32.

Reisigl

Wodak

(2009) The discourse-historical approach. In: Wodak

Meyer

(eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE, pp. 87–121.

33.

Sacks

(1992) Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

34.

Schmid

(2002) Persecution and identity conflicts: The case of German Jews. In: Duszak

(ed.) Us and Others: Social Identities across Languages, Discourses and Cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 357–374.

35.

Southerton

(2002) Boundaries of ‘us’ and ‘them’: Class, mobility and identification in a new town. Sociology 36: 171–193.

36.

van Dijk

(1995) Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In: Schäffner

Wenden

(eds) Language and Peace. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing, pp. 17–33.

37.

van Dijk

(1998) Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: SAGE.

38.

van Dijk

(2006) Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society 17(2): 359–383.

39.

Wągrowska

(2010) Tarcza antyrakietowa z polskiej perspektywy [Anti-missile shield from a Polish perspective]. In: Raabe

(ed.) Amerykańska tarcza antyrakietowa w Europie [American Anti-missile Shield in Europe]. Warsaw: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, pp. 39–47.

40.

Wodak

Meyer

([2001] 2009) Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In: Wodak

Meyer

(eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE, pp. 1–33.

41.

Wodak

de Cillia

Reisigl

Liebhart

(1999) The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

42.

Zolotarjov

(2008) Противоракетная оборона: история и перспективы [Anti-rocket defence: History and perspectives]. Россия в глобальной политике [Russia in the Global Politics] 3. Available at: http://www.globalaffairs.ru/-number/n_10948 (accessed 30 July 2011).