This article explicates the specific manners in which professorial power is indexed and implemented in the first personal pronoun `I' in academic discourse. The matter of analytic interest is to find out how the semiotic sign `I' acquires its semantic property of power in the pragmatic context of doctoral supervision. The data under consideration consist of two dyadic interactions conducted respectively by a PhD candidate with her two supervisors in an American university. The data analyses reveal that professorial power may be performed in two different ways (personal and positional) in three types of communicative acts — directive, evaluative, and explanative. The findings here may have some important implications for academic supervision in terms of the relationship between language and power.
Apple, M.W. (1996) `Power, Meaning and Identity: Critical Sociology of Education in the United States', British Journal of Sociology of Education17(2): 125-44.
2.
Apple, M.W. (2002) `Does Education Have Independent Power? Bernstein and the Question of Relative Autonomy', British Journal of Sociology of Education23(4): 607-16.
3.
Bartlett, A. and Mercer, G. (2000) `Reconceptualising Discourses of Power in Postgraduate Pedagogies', Teaching in Higher Education5(2): 195-204.
4.
Benveniste, E. (1966) Problèmes de Linguistique Générale. Paris: Gallimard.
5.
Bernstein, B. (1990) The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse, Volume IV: Class, Codes and Control. London: Routledge.
6.
Bernstein, B. (1996) Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. London: Falmer Press.
7.
Bourdieu, P. (1991) Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
Bradbury-Jones, C., Irvine, F. and Sambrook, S. (2007) `Unity and Detachment: A Discourse Analysis of Doctoral Supervision', International Journal of Qualitative Methods6(4): 81-96.
9.
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Brown, R. and Gilman. A. (1960) `The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity', in T.A. Sebeok (ed.) Style in Language, pp. 253-76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
Cameron, D. (1998) ```Is There Any Ketchup, Vera?'': Gender, Power and Pragmatics', Discourse & Society9(4): 437-55.
12.
Cooren, F. and Sanders, R.E. (2002) `Implicatures: A Schematic Approach', Journal of Pragmatics34: 1045-67.
13.
Council of Graduate Schools (1990) `The Doctor of Philosophy Degree: A Policy Statement', available online at: [http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/22/e6/cf.pdf ], accessed 8 November 2008.
14.
Diamond, J. (1996) Status and Power in Verbal Interaction: A Study of Discourse in a Close-Knit Social Network. Amsterdam : Benjamins.
15.
Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and Power. London: Longman.
16.
Fairclough, N. (2003) ```Political Correctness'': The Politics of Culture and Language', Discourse & Society14(1): 17-28.
17.
Fisher, S. (1991) `A Discourse of the Social: Medical Talk/Power Talk/Oppositional Talk?', Discourse & Society2(2): 157-82.
18.
Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison . New York: Vintage Books.
19.
Foucault, M. (1997) `The Subject and Power', in J.D. Faubion (ed.) Power, pp. 326-49. New York: The New Press.
20.
Fowler, R. and Kress, G. (1979) `Interviews', in R. Fowler, B. Hodge, G. Kress and T. Trew (eds) Language and Control, pp. 89-110. London : Routledge and Kegan Paul.
21.
Grant, B. (2003) `Mapping the Pleasures and Risks of Supervision' , Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education24(2): 175-90.
22.
Greimas, A.J. (1987) On Meaning: Selected Writings in Semiotic Theory . London: Frances Pinter.
23.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1977) Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
24.
Harré, R. (1991) `The Discursive Production of Selves', Theory and Psychology1: 51-63.
25.
Harré, R. (1994) `Is There Still a Problem about the Self?', in S. Deetz (ed.) Communication Yearbook, pp. 55-73. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Harré, R. and Mühlhäusler, P. (1990) Pronouns & People. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
27.
Hasan, R. (2002) `Ways of Meaning, Ways of Learning: Code as an Explanatory Concept', British Journal of Sociology of Education23(4): 537-48.
28.
Haworth, K. (2006) `The Dynamics of Power and Resistance in Police Interview Discourse', Discourse & Society17(6): 739-59.
29.
Hutchby, I. (1996) `Power in Discourse: The Case of Arguments on a British Talk Radio Show', Discourse & Society7(4): 481-97.
30.
Lakoff, R.T. (1990) Talking Power: The Politics of Languages. New York: Basic Books.
31.
Lovitts, B.E. (2008) `The Transition to Independent Research: Who Makes It, Who Doesn't, and Why', The Journal of Higher Education79(3): 296-325.
32.
Mumby, D.K. and Stohl, C. (1991) `Power and Discourse in Organization Studies: Absence and the Dialectic of Control', Discourse & Society2(3): 313-32.
33.
Pennycook, A. (2005) `Performing the Personal', Journal of Language , Identity, and Education4(4): 297-304.
34.
Rogers, C. (1977) On Personal Power: Inner Strength and Its Revolutionary Impact. New York: Delacorte Press .
Sanders, R.E. (1995) `A Neo-Rhetorical Perspective: The Enactment of Role-Identities as Interactive and Strategic', in S.J. Sigman (ed.) The Consequentiality of Communication, pp. 67-121. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
Searle, J. (1979) Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Tannen, D. (1987) `Remarks on Discourse and Power', in L. Kedar (ed.) Power through Discourse , pp. 3-10. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
39.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1977) Text and Context. London: Longman.
40.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1996) `Discourse, Power and Access', in R.C. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard (eds) Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, pp. 84-104. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
41.
Wang, J. (2006) `Questions and the Exercise of Power', Discourse & Society17(4): 529-48.
42.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953) Philosophical Investigations. New York: Macmillan.
43.
Wodak, R. (1989) Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins .
