Abstract
Background
As advance healthcare directives gain clarity in state legislation in Ireland, anaesthesiologists will come across patients with resuscitation orders that will demand interpretation when encountered perioperatively. Studies show variable perceptions among anaesthesiologists towards the binding nature of resuscitation orders in the context of anaesthesia provision. Currently, knowledge, perceptions and practices of anaesthesiologists in Ireland towards such orders are not known.
Methods
A cross-sectional online survey was distributed to anaesthesiologists in adult teaching hospitals.
Results
In this cohort, 65.9% of those surveyed did not know if there was a local hospital policy advance healthcare directive containing, do not attempt resuscitation, decisions in the perioperative period in their current hospital; 57.7% did not know if there was a policy for not for resuscitation orders; 74.8% did not know if there are guidelines for the management of patients with resuscitation orders. Irrespective of the presence of an order stating otherwise, 43.9% would initiate resuscitation in the event of any arrest occurring in theatre, with 66.7% initiating resuscitation if secondary to iatrogenesis.
Conclusions
By uncovering low self-perceived levels of knowledge and mixed perceptions towards resuscitation orders, the authors hope that the study initiates much-needed conversations on the topic, particularly at a time when advance healthcare directives find a more firm legal footing in Ireland.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.