The previous articles in this series have explored the need for perioperative practitioners to select a research approach that supports the aims of the study to be undertaken (Quick & Hall 2015a, b). The quantitative approach is considered by some authors to be ‘the epitome of the scientific approach’ (Meadows 2003) and this article, the third in a series, aims to give an overview of this model.
ClarkeC., ReedJ.2010Case study research In: GerrishK., LaceyA. (eds) The research process in nursingOxford, Wiley-Blackwell237–47
2.
ComleyP.2006The games we play: a psychoanalysis of the relationships between panel owners and panel participantsAmsterdam, ESOMAR123–32
3.
CONSORT Group2010Consolidated standards of reporting trials 2010 statement [online] Available from: www.consort-statement.org/consort-2010 [Accessed April 2015]
4.
DillmanD., SmythJ., ChristianL.2009Internet mail and mixed mode surveys. The tailored design methodHoboken, John Wiley and Sons
5.
DimondB.2011Legal aspects of nursingHarlow, Pearson Education Ltd
6.
DraperS.2008The hawthorne, pygmalion, placebo and other effects of expectation: some notes [online] Available from: www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/hawth [Accessed April 2015]
7.
FowlerF.2009Survey research methodsThousand Oaks(California), Sage Publications Inc
8.
GerrishK., LaceyA.2010Glossary In: GerrishK., LaceyA. (eds) The research process in nursingOxford, Wiley-Blackwell p 533
9.
HallS.2011Steadfast hands with experience Unpublished MSc thesis
HollowayI., WheelerS.2010Qualitative research in nursing and healthcareWest Sussex, Wiley-Blackwell
15.
HumadiS., StanfieldN.2006Statistics and computing in surgerySurgery24(8) 279–88
16.
JacksonC.J., FurnhamA.2000An overview of the design In: Designing and analysing questionnaires and surveys: a manual for health professionals and administratorsLondon, Whurr Publishers Ltd65–72
17.
JonesM., RattrayJ.2010Questionnaire design In: The research process in nursingGerrishK., LaceyA. (eds) Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell369–80
18.
JoshiA., KaleS., ChandelS., PalD.2015Likert scale: explored and explainedBritish Journal of Applied Science and Technology7(4) 396–403
19.
LaceyA.2010The research process In: GerrishK., LaceyA. (eds). The research process in nursingOxford, Wiley-Blackwell13–26
20.
MayoE.1933The human problems of an industrial civilisationNew York, MacMillan
21.
MeadowsK.2003So you want to do research? 4: An introduction to quantitative methodsBritish Journal of Community Nursing8(11) 519–26
22.
NelsonA., DumvilleJ., TorgersonD.2010Experimental research In: GerrishK., LaceyA. (eds) The research process in nursingOxford, Wiley-Blackwell199–215
23.
NightingaleA.2009A guide to systematic literature reviewsSurgery27(9) 381–84
24.
PetrieA., SabinC.2005Medical statistics at a glanceOxford, Blackwell
25.
ProcterS., AllanT., LaceyA.2010Sampling In: GerrishK., LaceyA. (eds) The research process in nursingOxford, Wiley-Blackwell143–52
26.
QuickJ., HallS.2015a An introduction to the research processJournal of Perioperative Practice25(4) 78–81
27.
QuickJ., HallS.2015b Qualitative researchJournal of Perioperative Practice25(7&8) 129–133
28.
ReevesB.2008Principles of research: limitations of non randomised studiesSurgery26120–24
WaltersS., FreemanJ.2010Description of analysis of quantitative data In: GerrishK., LaceyA. (eds) The research process in nursingOxford, Wiley-Blackwell437–53
33.
WilsonT.2000Recent trends in user studies: action research and qualitative methods [online] Available from: www.informationr.net/ir/5-3/paper76.html [Accessed April 2015]
34.
WrightJ.2009Non randomised and randomised trialsSurgery27371–74
