This retrospective audit evaluates the compliance of our operation notes with the British Orthopaedic Society Primary Hip Arthroplasty ‘A guide to good practice’ using a 24-data point question (BOA 2006). Ninety-nine notes reviewed, of which 94% had patient identifiers, the surgical team was documented in 92.5%, post-operative instruction in 97%, and prosthesis stability in 97% of cases. Despite high standards, we did not achieve the 100% gold standard. We suggest that increased awareness of the 24-point BOA guideline via education and proformas would help to ensure better practice
Al HussainyH, AliF, JonesS2004Improving the standard of operation notes in orthopaedic surgery: the value of a proformaInjury351102–6
2.
BaigrieRJ, BirchD, DowlingBL, DehnTCB1994An audit of the quality of operation notes in two district general hospitals; are we following Royal College guidelines?Annals of Royal College of Surgeons of England76(Suppl): 8–10
3.
BatemanND, CarneyAS, GibbinKP1994An audit of the quality of notes in an otolaryngology unitJournal of Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh4494–95
4.
British Orthopaedic Association2006Primary total hip replacement: a guide to good practiceLondon, BOA
5.
CamplingEA, DevlinHB, HoileRW, LunnJN1992The report of the National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths 1990 pp 131–4London, NCEPOD
6.
CurrallVA, ChesserTJ2008Computer generated operation notesStudies in Health Technology and Informatics13751–5
7.
DeimelD, MesserE, ThielemannHG, PichaG1999Standardized computer-based documentation system for diagnoses performance in orthopedics and traumatologyDevelopment Initial Applications in Orthopaedics28(3) 285–91
8.
DinR, JennaD, MudduBN2001The use of an aide-memoire to improve quality of operation notes in an orthopaedic unitAnnals of Royal College of Surgeons of England83319–20
9.
General Medical Council2001Good medical practiceLondon, GMC
10.
GhoshAK2010An audit of orthopaedic operation notes: what are we missing?Clinical Audit237–40
11.
KawuAA, ShaDG, SalamiOO2011Operative notes in orthopaedic surgical care in NigeriaInternational Journal of Biological & Medical Research2(3) 668–70
12.
McGregor-RileyJ, AliF, AlHussainy H, SukumarS2003Proformas can improve the quality of orthopaedic operation notesJournal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)85 (Supp II) 124
13.
MorganD, FisherN, AhmadA, AlamF2009Improving operation notes to meet British Orthopedic Association guidelinesAnnals of Royal College Surgeons of England91217–19
14.
NzeakoO, SouthgateC2011Trauma and orthopaedic notes. Time to get digital?Online Journal of Clinical Audits3(2)
15.
O'BichereA, SelluD1997The quality of operation notes: can simple word processors helpAnnals of Royal College of Surgeons of England79(5 Suppl) S204–9
16.
RigbyK, BrownSR, LakinG1999Use of a proforma improves colorectal cancer pathology reportingAnnals of Royal College of Surgeons of England81(6) 401–3
17.
Royal College of Surgeons of England1994Operation notes: An audit of RCS guidelinesLondon, RCS
18.
Royal College of Surgeons of England2008Good surgical practice: professional standards and regulationsLondon, RCSEng
