Elective Caesarean Section: A Case Study

Abstract

Caesarean section as a means of delivering babies has been around for centuries with numerous references to the procedure appearing in ancient writings (Simm & Matthew 2008). It is now the most common major surgical intervention carried out on women in the world, with between 23% and 30% of deliveries in the UK performed by caesarean section (Beech 2004). This rate is all the more surprising when one considers that caesarean section accounted for just 5.3% of UK births in 1973 (Kitzinger 1998). This rising rate has many implications for both clinical practice and the NHS. An Audit Commission report (1997) suggested that each 1% rise in the caesarean section rate would cost the NHS five million pounds per year. However, the increased rate also has clinical implications, with some studies suggesting that maternal mortality is three to seven times greater following abdominal rather than vaginal birth and maternal morbidity is proportionately even greater, even with elective procedures (McCourt et al 2004).