To compare ease of use, handling, defects and complication rates between single use and reusable instruments in cataract surgery.
Methods
Prospective questionnaire-based study involving ophthalmic surgeons operating during a one-year period.
Results
Results showed better scores in relation to questions regarding ease of use and handling for permanent instruments (p<0.0001).
Two complications out of 93 procedures were reported in the reusable group (2.2%) compared to six out of 157 in the disposable group (3.8%) (p = 0.4681).
Conclusions
Disposable instruments in cataract surgery are an acceptable and safe alternative to reusable ones.
ApelgrenK.N., BlankM.L., SlomskiC.A., HadjisN.S.1994Reusable instruments are more cost-effective than disposable instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomySurgical Endoscopy8(1) 32–34
2.
LejeuneC., ProstP., MichielsC.2001Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps: A prospective cost analysis in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Dijon University HospitalGastroenterology Clinique et Biologique25(6–7) 669–673
3.
MaheshwarA., DeM., BrowningS.T.2003Reusable versus disposable instruments in tonsillectomy: a comparative study of outcomesInternational Journal of Clinical Practice57(7) 579–583
4.
NICE2006Patient safety and reduction of risk of transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) via interventional procedures Available from: www.nice.org.uk/Guidance/IPG196 [Accessed September 2008]
5.
Royal College of Surgeons of England2005National Prospective Tonsillectomy Audit Final Report of an Audit Carried out in England and Northern Ireland between July 2003 and September 2004 Available from www.entuk.org/members/audits/tonsil/Tonsillectomyauditreport_pdf [Accessed 5 February 2009]
