This article highlights the need to use graduated compression stockings (GCS) in deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis. A survey carried out at the Middlesex Hospital, part of the UCLH NHS Trust, London, ascertains the prevalence of patients wearing either above- or below-knee GCS and whether or not these were worn correctly through two trials. The findings show how the choice of product can influence compliance, safety and economy, which in turn influences adherence to hospital policy.
AguO., HamiltonG., BakerD.1999Graduated Compression Stockings in the Prevention of Venous ThromboembolismBritish Journal of Surgery86992–1004
2.
BenkoT., CookeE.A., McNallyM.A., MollanR.A.2001Graduated Compression Stockings: knee-length versus thigh-lengthClinic Orthopaedics383197–203
3.
BosenquetN., FranksP., MoffattC.J.1993Community Leg Ulcer Clinics: cost effectivenessHealth Trends25(4) 145
4.
ByrneB.2001Deep Vein Prophylaxis: the effectiveness and implications of using below-knee or thigh-length graduated compression stockingsHeart and Lung30(4) 277–283
5.
CollierM.1999Brevet TX: anti-embolism stockings for prevention and treatment of DVTBritish Journal of Nursing8(11) 44–49
HedgesA.R.1987Preventing DVTJournal of District Nursing July 4–5
8.
O'NeillM.J.2001Developing a Clinically Effective DVT Prophylaxis ProtocolJournal of Orthopaedic Nursing5186–197
9.
PorteousL.M.J., NicholsonE.A., MorrisL.T., JamesR., NegusD.1989Thigh-length Versus Knee-length Stockings in the Prevention of Deep Vein ThrombosisBritish Journal of Surgery76296–297
WilliamsA.M., DaviesP.R., SweetnamD.I.S., HarperG., PuseyR., LightowlerC.D.R.1996Knee-length Versus Thigh-length Graduated Compression Stockings in the Prevention of Deep Vein ThrombosisBritish Journal of Surgery831553
