Bourdieu’s field‑theoretic model posits a structural homology between social positions and tastes for food, yet contemporary cultural‑sociological debates demonstrated that this framework often treats national food fields as monolithic, overlooking the historical sociogenetic processes that shape taste. The theoretical challenge, therefore, is to reconcile the Bourdieusian homology with the Eliasian sociogenetic insight that long‑term ‘civilizing processes’ produce spatially differentiated habitus and symbolic hierarchies. This article proposes a sociogenetic fields theoretical framework that integrates Bourdieu’s relational analysis with Elias’s sociogenesis of tastes, offering a resolve that retains the homology while embedding it in historically contingent spatial trajectories. To illustrate the framework, correspondence analysis of the 2021 Italian Household Budget Survey data maps expenditure across six occupational classes and the South-Centre/North macro‑regional divide. The findings confirm that class‑based tastes for food align with capital‑volume and capital‑composition dimensions, but the specific items embodying these dimensions differ regionally. By foregrounding the theoretical integration of field theory and sociogenesis, the study contributes a generalizable framework for cultural sociology.
AppaduraiA (2010) Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, (9th edn). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
2.
AtkinsonW (2011) The context and genesis of musical tastes: Omnivorousness debunked, Bourdieu buttressed. Poetics39(3): 169–186.
3.
AtkinsonW (2016) Class and cuisine in contemporary Britain reheated: A reply to Flemmen and Hjellbrekke. The Sociological Review64(1): 194–201.
4.
AtkinsonW (2018) Bourdieu and Schutz: Bringing together two sons of Husserl. In: MedvetzTSallazJJ (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Pierre Bourdieu. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 398–420.
5.
AtkinsonW (2022) The U.S. space of lifestyles and its homologies. Sociological Perspectives65(6): 1060–1080.
6.
AtkinsonWDeemingC (2015) Class and cuisine in contemporary Britain: the social space, the space of food and their homology. The Sociological Review63(4): 876–896.
7.
AtkinsonWSchmitzA (2022) The German social space and its homologies: National variation on a basic structure. Current Sociology72(1): 168–191.
BeckU (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
10.
BenedettiILauretiTSecondiL (2016) Exploring the Italians’ food habits and tendency towards the Mediterranean diet. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics71(1): 218–228.
11.
BennettTSavageMSilvaEB, et al. (2009) Culture, Class Distinction. Abingdon: Routledge.
12.
BenzécriJP (1992) Correspondence Analysis Handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker.
13.
BiasettiD (2003) Italy retail food sector report 2003, rep., Rome: Global Agriculture Information Network.
14.
BileviciusT (2024) Exploring the Italian space of lifestyles: Food, class, and their homology. Italian Sociological Review14(2): 465–485.
15.
BourdieuP (1979) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (11th edn). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJ (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood, 241–258.
18.
BourdieuP (1987) What makes a social class? On the theoretical and practical existence of groups. Berkeley Journal of Sociology32: 1–17.
19.
BourdieuP (1989) Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory7(1): 14–25.
20.
BourdieuP (1990) Structures, habitus, practices. In: BourdieuP (ed.) The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 52–65.
21.
BourdieuP (1993a) Some properties of fields. In: BourdieuP (ed.) Sociology in Question. London: Sage, 72–77.
22.
BourdieuP (1993b) The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
23.
BourdieuP (1996) The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24.
BourdieuP (2008 [1980]) The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
BourdieuPWacquantLJD (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
BourdieuPWacquantLJDFarageS (1994) Rethinking the state: Genesis and structure of the bureaucratic field. Sociological Theory12(1): 1–18.
27.
BrasiliCFanfaniR (2006) Agri-food districts: Theory and evidence. In: MorganE (ed.) The New European Rurality. Abingdon: Routledge, 61–85.
28.
BrownJLMillerD (2002) Couples’ Gender role preferences and management of family food preferences. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior34(4): 215–223.
29.
CappeliezS (2017) How well does terroir travel? Illuminating cultural translation using a comparative wine case study. Poetics65: 24–36.
30.
CavaliereADe MarchiEDonzelliF, et al. (2019) Is the Mediterranean Diet for all? An analysis of socioeconomic inequalities and food consumption in Italy. British Food Journal121(6): 1327–1341.
31.
CevascoRHearnRPesciniV (eds) (2023) Situating Foodways and Foodscapes: Dalla Tavola al Terreno. Genova: Genova University Press.
32.
ChanTWGoldthorpeJH (2007) Class and status: The conceptual distinction and its empirical relevance. American Sociological Review72(4): 512–532.
33.
ClapierPMadreJL (1979) Structure des budgets familiaux et des impôts indirects. Cahiers de l’analyse des données4(4): 443–463.
34.
CounihanC (2019) Food consumption and food activism in Italy. In: SassatelliR (ed.) Italians and Food. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 101–125.
35.
DavolioFSassatelliR (2019) Good food and nice people: Hospitality and the construction of quality among the Italian middle class. In: SassatelliR (ed.) Italians and Food. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 127–150.
36.
DemossierM (2011) Beyond terroir: Territorial construction, hegemonic discourses, and French wine culture. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute17(4): 685–705.
37.
DolciniJPonzioED’ErricoMM, et al. (2024) Socioeconomic differences in dietary habits in Italy before and during COVID-19 pandemic: Secondary analysis of a nationwide cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health24: 153.
38.
DomaneschiL (2012) Food social practices: Theory of practice and the new battlefield of food quality. Journal of Consumer Culture12(3): 306–322.
39.
EhlertJ (2021) Food consumption, habitus and the embodiment of social change: Making class and doing gender in urban Vietnam. The Sociological Review69(3): 681–701.
40.
EliasN (2000 [1939]) The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations (rev. edn). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
41.
EliasN (2006 [1969]) The Court Society. Dublin: University College Dublin Press.
42.
FischlerC (1993) L’homnivore: le gôut, la cuisine et le corps (Corrected edn). Paris: Jacob.
43.
FlemmenMHjellbrekkeJ (2016) Response: Not so fast: A comment on Atkinson and Deeming’s ‘class and cuisine in contemporary Britain: The social space, the space of food and their homology’. The Sociological Review64(1): 184–193.
44.
FlemmenMHjellbrekkeJJarnessV (2018) Class, culture and culinary tastes: Cultural distinctions and social class divisions in contemporary Norway. Sociology52(1): 128–149.
45.
FontefrancescoMF (2020) Food Festivals and Local Development in Italy: A Viewpoint from Economic Anthropology. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
46.
FontefrancescoMF (2023) Traditional food for a sustainable future? Exploring vulnerabilities and strengths in Italy’s foodscape and short agrifood chains. Sustainable Earth Reviews6(1): 7.
47.
FontefrancescoMF (2024) Rural Affective Economies: An Ethnographic Approach to Local Development in Rural Italy. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
48.
FontefrancescoMFZocchiDMPieroniA (2023) The intersections between food and cultural landscape: Insights from three mountain case studies. Land12(3): 676.
49.
ForleoMBBenedettoG (2020) Creative cities of gastronomy: Towards relationship between city and countryside. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science22: 100247.
50.
FornariCDonfrancescoCRivaMA, et al. (2010) Social status and cardiovascular disease: A Mediterranean case. Results from the Italian Progetto CUORE cohort study. BMC Public Health10(1): 574.
51.
GramsciA (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. New York: International Publishers.
52.
GramsciA (2005 [1926]) The Southern Question. Toronto: Guernica Editions.
53.
GreenacreMJ (2017) Correspondence Analysis in Practice (3rd edn). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
54.
GrossoGMarventanoSBuscemiS, et al. (2013) Factors associated with adherence to the Mediterranean diet among adolescents living in Sicily, Southern Italy. Nutrients5(12): 4908–4923.
55.
HarperDAFaccioliP (2010) The Italian Way: Food and Social Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
56.
HelstoskyCF (2005) Garlic and Oil: Food and Politics in Italy. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
57.
HjellbrekkeJ (2019) Multiple Correspondence Analysis for the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.
58.
KollnigS (2020) The ‘good people’ of Cochabamba city: Ethnicity and race in Bolivian middle-class food culture. Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies15(1): 23–43.
59.
KühneOFischerJDSedelmeierT, et al. (eds) (2023) Foodscapes: Theory, History, and Current European Examples. Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg.
60.
LahireB (2006) La culture des individus: dissonances culturelles et distinction de soi. Paris: La Découverte.
61.
LamontM (1994) Money, Morals, and Manners: The Culture of the French and the American Upper-Middle Class. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
62.
LizardoOSkilesS (2015) After omnivorousness. In: HanquinetLSavageM (eds) Routledge International Handbook of the Sociology of Art and Culture. Abingdon: Routledge, 90–103.
63.
LuptonD (2015) Food, the Body and the Self. London: Sage.
64.
MartinJL (2003) What is field theory?American Journal of Sociology109(1): 1–49.
65.
MennellS (2015) Sociogenesis and psychogenesis: Norbert Elias’s historical social psychology as a research tradition in comparative sociology. Comparative Sociology14(4): 548–564.
66.
MoeN (2002) The View from Vesuvius: Italian Culture and the Southern Question. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
67.
MurcottA (1995) ‘It’s a pleasure to cook for him’: Food, mealtimes and gender in some South Wales households. In: JacksonSMooresS (eds) The Politics of Domestic Consumption. Abingdon: Routledge, 9–99.
68.
OnciniFTriventiM (2021) Ascent of the herbivores, decline of the carnivores: The social stratification of eating profiles in Italy, 1997–2016. Poetics87: 101533.
69.
OnciniFRödlMBTriventiM, et al. (2023) Cultural intolerance, in practice: Social variation in food and drink avoidances in Italy, 2003–2016. Social Indicators Research170(3): 1075–1096.
70.
ParasecoliF (2019) The invention of authentic Italian food: Narratives, rhetoric, and media. In: SassatelliR (ed.) Italians and Food. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 17–41.
71.
PetersonRA (1992) Understanding audience segmentation: From elite and mass to omnivore and univore. Poetics21(4): 243–258.
72.
PetersonRAKernRM (1996) Changing highbrow taste: From snob to omnivore. American Sociological Review61(5): 900–907.
73.
PrieurARosenlundLSkjott-LarsenJ (2008) Cultural capital today: A case study from Denmark. Poetics36(1): 45–71.
74.
RamosV (2023) Food consumption, social class and taste in contemporary Portugal. Journal of Consumer Culture23(4): 903–925.
75.
RaoHMoninPDurandR (2005) Border crossing: Bricolage and the erosion of categorical boundaries in French gastronomy. American Sociological Review70(6): 968–991.
76.
RaoPABeidelDCMurrayMJ (2008) Social skills interventions for children with Asperger’s syndrome or high-functioning autism: A review and recommendations. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders38(2): 353–361.
77.
ReckwitzA (2002) Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory5(2): 243–263.
78.
RitzerG (2003) The McDonaldization of Society (New century edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
79.
RooseHvan EijckKLievensJ (2012) Culture of distinction or culture of openness? Using a social space approach to analyze the social structuring of lifestyles. Poetics40(6): 491–513.
80.
RuggieroEDi CastelnuovoACostanzoS, et al. (2019) Socioeconomic and psychosocial determinants of adherence to the Mediterranean diet in a general adult Italian population. European Journal of Public Health29(2): 328–335.
81.
SassatelliR (2010) Consumer Culture: History, Theory and Politics. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
82.
SassatelliR (2019a) Introduction: Food, foodways and Italianicity. In: SassatelliR (ed.) Italians and Food. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 1–15.
83.
SassatelliR (ed.) (2019b) Italians and Food. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG.
84.
SatoPMGittelsohnJUnsainRF, et al. (2016) The use of Pierre Bourdieu’s distinction concepts in scientific articles studying food and eating: A narrative review. Appetite96: 174–186.
85.
ScarpelliniE (2015) Food and Foodways in Italy from 1861 to the Present. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
86.
ScarsiNPastorinoRSavoiaC, et al. (2025) Dietary patterns of adults in Italy: Results from the third Italian National Food Consumption Survey, INRAN-SCAI. PLoS One20(6): e0312977.
87.
SgroiFModicaF (2023) Food and tourism: An exploratory analysis of dishes in Sicilian gastronomic culture. Journal of Marine and Island Cultures12(2): 135–143.
88.
SmithGBerrutiG (2023) The Landscapes of Italian Food: Local Development and Healthy Practices. London: Routledge.
89.
SonninoR (2013) Local foodscapes: Place and power in the agri-food system. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B Soil and Plant Science63(sup 1): 2–7.
90.
SpellerJRW (2011) Autonomy. In: SpellerJRW (ed.) Bourdieu and Literature. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, 79–101.
91.
TomlinsonM (1998) Changes in tastes in Britain, 1985–1992. British Food Journal100(6): 295–301.
92.
TomlinsonMWardeA (1993) Social class and change in eating habits. British Food Journal95(1): 3–10.
93.
TrubekAB (2001) Haute Cuisine: How the French Invented the Culinary Profession. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
94.
VandebroeckD (2017) Distinctions in the Flesh: Social Class and the Embodiment of Inequality. London: Routledge.
95.
Van der MeulenHS (2008) The emergence of slow food: social entrepreneurship, local foods and the Piedmont gastronomy cluster. In: HulsinkWDonsJJM (eds) Pathways to High-Tech Valleys and Research Triangles: Innovative Entrepreneurship, Knowledge Transfer and Cluster Formation in Europe and the United States. Dordrecht: Springer, 225–247.
96.
VannoniFSpadeaTFrascaG, et al. (2003) Association between social class and food consumption in the Italian EPIC population. Tumori89(6): 669–678.
97.
VineisPFaggianoFRiboliE, et al. (1992) Dietary habits, internal migration and social class in a sample of a Northern Italian population. Tumori Journal78(4): 235–238.
98.
WardeA (1997) Consumption, Food and Taste. London: Sage.
99.
WardeA (2007) Does taste still serve power? The fate of distinction in Britain. Sociologica3: 1–27.
100.
WardeA (2014) After taste: Culture, consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture14(3): 279–303.
101.
WardeA (2016) The Practice of Eating. Cambridge: Polity Press.
102.
WardeAHazirIK (2015) The cultural omnivore thesis. In: HanquinetLSavageM (eds) Routledge International Handbook of the Sociology of Art and Culture. Abingdon: Routledge, 77–86.
103.
WardeAChengSLOlsenW, et al. (2007) Changes in the practice of eating: A comparative analysis of time-use. Acta Sociologica50(4): 363–385.
104.
WelchDPaddockJWardeA (2017) Studying consumption through the lens of practice. In: KellerM (ed.) Routledge Handbook on Consumption. London: Routledge, 25–35.
105.
ZocchiDMFontefrancescoMFCorvoP, et al. (2021) Recognising, safeguarding, and promoting food heritage: Challenges and prospects for the future of sustainable food systems. Sustainability13(17): 9510.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
