Rampant Abstraction as a Strategy of Singularization: Genre on Spotify

Abstract

If processes of categorization are central to cultural sociology, then current developments as regards genre formation in the realm of music-streaming services call for attention. A double process of computerized genre analysis (producing a potentially infinite array of categories) and increasingly context-specific music recommendation (accommodating a vision of limitless personalization) challenges established, scene- and identity-based ideas about genre, as developed in popular-music studies. Drawing on Reckwitz’s (2020) theory of the society of singularities, this article argues for considering this double process as the intersection of the logics of, respectively, the general and the particular. These logics are mediated by a dynamic sense of abstraction, involved in processes of labelling, enabling levels of generality while manifesting a potential for concretion. The increased scope, acceleration, and dynamicity of such abstraction mark genre formation in digital times. The article makes this argument looking particularly at the case of Spotify – market leader and front runner in the noted developments – as a basis for engaging broader questions about musical genre theory in the context of digitized culture and current conditions of musical life.

Keywords

abstraction categorization classification musical genre singularization streaming

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adorno

(1941) On popular music. Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 9(1): 17–48.

Ahlkvist

(2001) Programming philosophies and the rationalization of music radio. Media, Culture & Society 23(3): 339–358.

Alaimo

Kallinikos

(2020) Managing by data: Algorithmic categories and organizing. Organization Studies 42(9): 1385–1407.

Anderson

(2015) Neo-muzak and the business of mood. Critical Inquiry 41(4): 811–840.

Aucouturier

J-J

Pampalk

(2008) Introduction – From genres to tags: A little epistemology of music information retrieval research. Journal of New Music Research 37(2): 87–92.

Becker

(1982) Art Worlds. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.

Besseny

(2019) Lost in Spotify: Folksonomy and wayfinding functions in Spotify’s interface and companion apps. Popular Communication 18(1): 1–17.

Born

(2011) Music and the materialization of identities. Journal of Material Culture 16(4): 376–388.

Born

Haworth

(2017) From microsound to vaporwave: Internet-mediated musics, online methods, and genre. Music & Letters 98(4): 601–647.

10.

Bourdieu

(1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.

11.

Bourdieu

(1993) The Field of Cultural production: Essays on Art and Literature. Cambridge: Polity Press.

12.

Bowker

Star

(1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

13.

Brackett

(2016) Categorizing Sound: Genre and Twentieth-Century Popular Music. Oakland: University of California Press.

14.

Cheney-Lippold

(2017) We are Data: Algorithms and the Making of Our Digital Selves. New York: New York University Press.

15.

Crook

(2015) Spotify introduces video clips, podcasts, and activity-based playlists. TechCrunch. Available at: https://techcrunch.com/2015/05/20/spotify-introduces-video-clips-podcasts-and-activity-based-playlists/ (accessed 5 April 2022).

16.

Danuser

(1995) Gattung. In: Finschler

(ed.) Die Musik in Geschichte und Gegenwart (2nd revised edn). Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1042–1069.

17.

DeNora

(2014) Making Sense of Reality: Culture and Perception in Everyday Life. London: Sage.

18.

Dewey

(1920) Reconstruction in Philosophy. New York: H. Holt and Company.

19.

DiMaggio

(1987) Classification in Art. American Sociological Review 52(4): 440–455.

20.

Douglas

(1986) How Institutions Think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

21.

Drott

(2013) The end(s) of genre. Journal of Music Theory 57(1): 1–45.

22.

Drott

(2018a) Why the next song matters: Streaming, recommendation, scarcity. Twentieth-Century Music 15(3): 325–357.

23.

Drott

(2018b) Music as a technology of surveillance. Journal of the Society for American Music 12(3): 233–267.

24.

Eriksson

Fleischer

Johansson

, et al (2019) Spotify Teardown: Inside the Black Box of Streaming Music. London: The MIT Press.

25.

Frith

(1996) Performing Rites: On the Value of Popular Music. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

26.

Gandini

Corbella

Ludovico

, et al (2022) SpotiGeM. Available at: https://spotigem.lim.di.unimi.it/ (accessed 27 June 2022).

27.

Glaser

Westergren

Stearns

, et al (2006) Consumer item matching method and system. US: Pandora Media, Inc. Available at: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7003515B1/en (accessed 25 April 2023).

28.

Haggerty

Ericson

(2000) The surveillant assemblage. The British Journal of Sociology 51(4): 605–622.

29.

Hesmondhalgh

Jones

Rauh

(2019) SoundCloud and Bandcamp as alternative music platforms. Social Media + Society 5(4). Published online 26 November. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119883.

30.

Holt

(2007) Genre in Popular Music. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

31.

James

(2017) Is the post- in post-identity the post- in post-genre? Popular Music 36(1): 21–32.

32.

James

(1981) The Principles of Psychology. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.

33.

Johnson

(2018) Analyzing Genre in Post-Millennial Popular Music. New York, City University of New York: CUNY Academic Works.

34.

Johnson

(2020) Chance the Rapper, Spotify, and musical categorization in the 2010s. American Music (Champaign, IL) 38(2): 176–196.

35.

Johnston

(2018) How Spotify Discovers the Genres of Tomorrow. Available at: https://artists.spotify.com/blog/how-spotify-discovers-the-genres-of-tomorrow (accessed 7 June 2019).

36.

Kassabian

(2013) Ubiquitous Listening: Affect, Attention, and Distributed Subjectivity. Berkeley: University of California Press.

37.

Knees

Schedl

(2016) Music Similarity and Retrieval: An Introduction to Audio- and Web-Based Strategies. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

38.

Knudsen

Christensen

(2014) Eventful events: Eventmaking strategies in contemporary culture. Enterprising Initiatives in the Experience Economy. New York: Routledge, 117–134.

39.

Knudsen

Jerne

(2019) Oplevelsesøkonomi og begivenhedskultur. In: Eriksson

Schiermer

(eds) Ny Kulturteori. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag, 169–196.

40.

Krogh

(2015) Assembling Aarhus West: Glocal rap, genre and heterogeneity. Popular Music History 10(3): 280–296.

41.

Krogh

(2020) ‘Context is the new genre’ – Abstraktion og singularisering i digital musikformidling. Norsk medietidsskrift 27(3): 1–15.

42.

Krogh

(2022) Experimentation in and with the Stream: Music, Mood Management and Affect. In: Knudsen

Krogh

Stage

(eds) Methodologies of Affective Experimentation. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 117–138.

43.

Lamere

(2008) Social Tagging and Music Information Retrieval. Journal of new music research 37(2): 101–114.

44.

Lamere

(2015) How We Listen to Music. Available at: https://www.slideshare.net/plamere/how-we-listen-to-music-sxsw-2015 (accessed 6 Feburary 2023).

45.

Lamere

(2016) Organize Your Music. Available at: http://organizeyourmusic.playlistmachinery.com (accessed 27 June 2022).

46.

Lena

(2012) Banding Together: How Communities Create Genres in Popular Music. Princeton, MJ: Princeton University Press.

47.

Lena

Peterson

(2008) Classification as culture: Types and trajectories of music genres. American Sociological Review 73(5): 697–718.

48.

Majewski

(2020) Meet Your Audience. Available at: https://adstudio.spotify.com/meet-your-audience (accessed 16 January 2020).

49.

Massumi

(2002) Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. London: Duke University Press.

50.

McDonald

(2013) How We Understand Music Genres. Available at: https://blog.echonest.com/post/52385283599/how-we-understand-music-genres (accessed 7 June 2016).

51.

McDonald

(2022) Every Noise at Once. Available at: http://everynoise.com (accessed 29 August 2022).

52.

Neale

(1980) Genre. London: BFI Books.

53.

Negus

(1999) Music Genres and Corporate Cultures. London and New York: Routledge.

54.

Pelly

(2018) Streambait pop: The emergence of a total Spotify genre. The Bafler, 29 January.

55.

Prey

(2016) Musica Analytica: The Datafication of listening. In: Nowak

Whelan

(eds) Networked Music Cultures. Bristol: Palgrave Macmillan, 31–48.

56.

Prey

(2018) Nothing personal: Algorithmic individuation on music streaming platforms. Media, Culture & Society 40(7): 1086–1100.

57.

Reckwitz

(2002) Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory 5(2): 243–263.

58.

Reckwitz

(2017) The Invention of Creativity: Modern Society and the Culture of the New. Cambridge: Polity Press.

59.

Reckwitz

(2020) The Society of Singularities. Cambridge and Medford, MA: Polity Press. Available at: ProQuest Ebook Central (accessed 29 August 2022).

60.

Regev

(2013) Pop-Rock Music: Aesthetic Cosmopolitanism in Late Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

61.

Rodman

(2016) Radio formats in the United States: A hyperfragmentation of the imagination. In: Baade

Deaville

(eds) Music and the Broadcast Experience: Performance, Production, and Audiences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 235–257.

62.

Rossman

(2012) Climbing the Charts: What Radio Airplay Tells Us About the Diffusion of Innovation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

63.

Samson

(2001) Genre. In: Sadie

Tyrrell

(eds) The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians. London: Macmillan, 657–659.

64.

Siles

Segura-Castillo

Sancho

, et al (2019) Genres as social affect: Cultivating moods and emotions through playlists on Spotify. Social Media + Society 5(2): 1–11. Published online 25 May. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119847514.

65.

Slaby

Mühlhoff

(2019) Affect. In: Slaby

Scheve

(eds) Affective Societies: Key Concepts (1st edn). New York: Routledge, 27–41.

66.

Spotify (2020) Wrapped 2019. Available at: https://open.spotify.com/genre/2019-page (accessed 25 April 2023).

67.

Spotify Advertising (2022a) Culture Next (Vol. 4, white paper). Available at: https://culturenext2022.byspotify.com/en-US (accessed 21 August 2022).

68.

Spotify Advertising (2022b) Marketing to Millennials on Spotify: Key Streaming Moments. Available at: https://ads.spotify.com/en-AU/millennials-on-spotify/ (accessed 12 July 2022).

69.

Spotify Advertising (2022c) Stream of Context: Your Guide to Everyday Audio Moments. Available at: https://ads.spotify.com/en-US/stream-context-guide-everyday-audio-moments/ (accessed 12 April 2022).

70.

Spotify for Brands (2018a) Spotify.Me: You are What You Stream. Previously Available at: https://spotify.me/en (accessed 16 January 2020).

71.

Spotify for Brands (2018b) Understanding People Through Music: Millennial Edition (white paper). Available at: https://assets.ctfassets.net/ziwa9xqm84y1/2O734MItRSYq0sSeYeE4eY/9a4769cdf150b59d6621551af24f3d8f/Spotify_Millennial_Edition_May_2018.pdf (accessed 21 June 2021).

72.

Spotify for Brands (2020) Audiences: You are What You Stream. Available at: https://www.spotifyforbrands.com/da-DK/audiences/ (accessed 16 January 2020).

73.

Sturm

(2014) The state of the art ten years after a state of the art: Future research in music information retrieval. Journal of New Music Research 43(2): 147–172.

74.

Toynbee

(2000) Making Popular Music: Musicians, Creativity and Institutions. London: Arnold.

75.

Van Venrooij

Schmutz

(2015) Classifications in popular music. In: Wright

(ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition). Oxford: Elsevier, 799–804.

76.

Walser

(1993) Running with the Devil: Power, Gender, and Madness in Heavy Metal Music. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.

77.

Weisbard

(1999) Conjunction junction. The Village Voice 44(8): 69–72.

78.

Weisbard

(2014) Top 40 Democracy: The Rival Mainstreams of American Music. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

79.

Werner

(2021) Playlist communities – genre, gender, and race on Spotify’s most followed playlists. In: Digital Music Socialities conference, Aarhus University, 11 November 2021. Aarhus: School of Communication and Culture.

80.

Whitman

(2012) How Music Recommendation Works – and Doesn’t Work. Available at: https://notes.variogr.am/2012/12/11/how-music-recommendation-works-and-doesnt-work/ (accessed 14 March 2022).

81.

Winther

(2014) James and Dewey on abstraction. The Pluralist 9(2): 1–28.