Accelerating climate change has set in motion a broad change in beliefs about human life that is affecting the social sciences and humanities (SSH). A deeper understanding of the social causes and consequences of climate change is evolving in sociology, yet some of the discipline’s subfields have not responded to climate change. Is this because climate change is perceived to be irrelevant or are scholars suppressing new beliefs that could disrupt the norms of their field? The sociology of the arts provides an illustrative case. This subfield has historically ignored environmental factors, but there is mounting pressure for correcting this oversight and rethinking the beliefs and norms of the field. This article argues that climate change is relevant to the sociology of the arts and that this subfield can become more aligned with the geo-ecological turn in sociology and the SSH. This turn is part of a wider epochal and existential transformation in public consciousness in response to broad changes in society and nature. Changing beliefs about the arts are therefore not explained by endogenous dynamics in the arts field. The article provides a meta-analysis of the geo-ecological turn in sociology and in interdisciplinary arts and cultural research where pioneering arguments have emerged. The analysis uses theory of disciplinary transformation in the sociology of science to analyze largely implicit sociological claims for a transformation of ‘normal science’ beliefs about (1) aesthetic exceptionalism, illustrated by a new conception of music as a study object, and (2) the role of the arts in economic growth. Some implications for the sociology of the arts are considered.
AllenADaweK (eds) (2016) Current Directions in Ecomusicology: Music, Nature, Environment. New York: Routledge.
2.
AronoffKBattistoniACohenD, et al. (2019) A Planet to Win: Why We Need a Green New Deal. London and New York: Verso.
3.
BanksM (2020) Creative economy, degrowth, and aesthetic limitation. In: OakleyKBanksM (eds) Cultural Industries and the Environmental Crisis: New Approaches for Policy. Cham: Springer, 11–23.
4.
BaumanZ (2011) Collateral Damage: Social Inequalities in a Global Age. Cambridge: Polity.
5.
BeckU (2009) World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.
6.
BeckU (2016) The Metamorphosis of the World. Cambridge: Polity.
7.
BeckerH (1982) Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8.
BennettM (2020) Ruins of the Anthropocene: The aesthetics of arctic climate change. Annals of the American Association of Geographers111(3): 921–931. DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2020.1835457.
9.
BoltanskiL (1999 [1993]) Distant Suffering: Morality, Media and Politics (trans. BurchellG). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BornG (2000) Introduction: On difference, representation, and appropriation in music. In: BornGHesmondhalghD (eds) Western Music and Its Others: Difference, Representation, and Appropriation in Music. Berkeley: University of California Press, sections IV–V, 31–58.
11.
BornG (2010) For a relational musicology: Music and interdisciplinarity, beyond the practice turn. Journal of the Royal Music Association135(2): 205–243.
12.
BornG (2011) Music and the materialization of identities. Journal of Material Culture16(4): 376–388.
13.
BourdieuP (1986 [1979]) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. London and New York: Routledge.
14.
BourdieuP (1996 [1992]) The Rules of Art (trans. EmanuelS). Cambridge: Polity Press.
15.
BrookOO’BrienDTaylorM (2020) Culture is Bad for You: Inequality and the Cultural and Creative Industries. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
16.
CarawayB (2020) Interrogating Amazon’s sustainability innovation. In: OakleyKBanksM (eds) Cultural Industries and the Environmental Crisis: New Approaches for Policy. Cham: Springer, 65–78.
DevineK (2019) Decomposed: The Political Ecology of Music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
DiMaggioP (2000) The production of scientific change: Richard Peterson and the institutional turn in cultural sociology. Poetics28: 107–136.
28.
DunlapRBrulleR (2015) Climate Change and Society: Sociological Perspectives. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
DunlapRCattonW (1994) Struggling with human exemptionalism: The rise, decline and revitalization of environmental sociology. The American Sociologist25(1): 5–30.
30.
ElliottR (2018) The sociology of climate change as a sociology of loss. European Journal of Sociology59(3): 301–337.
31.
ElliottR (2021) Underwater: Loss, Flood Insurance, and the Moral Economy of Climate Change in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.
32.
EmmettRNyeD (eds) (2017) The Environmental Humanities: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
GautierA (2016) Acoustic multinaturalism, the value of nature, and the nature of music in ecomusicology. boundary 243(1): 108–141.
35.
GibbonsMLimogesCNowotnyH, et al. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: SAGE.
36.
GiddensA (2011 [2009]) The Politics of Climate Change (2nd edn revised and updated). London: Polity Press.
37.
GlotfeltyC (1996) Introduction: Literary studies in an age of environmental crisis. In: GlotfeltyCFrommH (eds) The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology. Athens and London: University of Georgia Press, xv–xxxvi.
38.
HabermasJ (1987 [1968]) Knowledge and Human Interests (trans. ShapiroJ). Cambridge: Polity Press.
39.
HarawayD (2016) Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
HarringtonA (2004) Art and Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
42.
HesmondhalghD (2019 [2000]) The Cultural Industries (4th edn). London: SAGE.
43.
HoltF (2020) Everyone Loves Live Music: A Theory of Performance Institutions. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.
44.
HynesP (1989) The Recurring Silent Spring. New York: Pergamon Press.
45.
IngramD (2010) The Jukebox in the Garden: Ecocriticism and American Popular Music Since 1960. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.
46.
IPPC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2021) Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis: Summary for Policymakers. Switzerland. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/ (accessed 7 December 2021).
47.
JerolmackC (2021) Up to Heaven and Down to Hell: Fracking, Freedom, and Community in an American Town. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
MaxwellR (2020) Green accounting for a creative economy. In: OakleyKBanksM (eds) Cultural Industries and the Environmental Crisis. Cham: Springer, 25–36.
62.
MerchantC (2018) Science and Nature: Past, Present, and Future. London and New York: Routledge.
63.
MerchantC (2020 [1980]) The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution (updated 40th anniversary edition with new preface). New York: HarperCollins.
64.
NowotnyHScottPGibbonsM (2001) Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
PedeltyM (2012) Ecomusicology: Rock, Folk, and the Environment. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
70.
PedeltyM (2016) A Song to Save the Salish Sea: Musical Performance as Environmental Activism. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
71.
PetersonR (1976) The production of culture: Prolegomenon. American Behavioral Scientist19(6): 669–684.
72.
PetersonR (1997) Creating Country Music: Fabricating Authenticity. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.
73.
PetersonRAnandN (2004) The production of culture perspective. Annual Review of Sociology30: 311–334.
74.
PowellWDiMaggioP (1991) Introduction. In: PowellWDiMaggioP (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press, 1–38.
75.
RobertsTParksB (2007) A Climate of Injustice: Global Inequality, North–South Politics, and Climate Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
76.
ScottLJohnsonE (2017) From fringe to core? The integration of environmental sociology. Environmental Sociology3(1): 17–29.
77.
ShippersHGrantC (eds) (2016) Sustainable Futures for Music Cultures: An Ecological Perspective. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
