Popular discourse describing selfies as the “narcissistic”2 practice of teenagers or a tool of personal empowerment, minimize the structural constraints under which selfies operate as a ubiquitous mode of sociality. Based on focus group discussions in two Canadian cities, we explore how young adults describe their selfie experiences and explore three discursive tensions expressed in the transcripts. First, how questions of “control” were taken up; second, how “visibility” was understood as fragile, and animated by an anxiety of invisibility; third, the nature of “fun” that selfies generate. We conclude by exploring some of the epistemological shifts that these practices indicate.
AbidinCGwynneJ (2017) Entrepreneurial selves, feminine corporeality and lifestyle blogging in Singapore. Asian Journal of Social Science45(4–5): 358–408.
2.
AhmedS (2010) The Promise of Happiness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
3.
AndradeAPM (2015) SNAPPING, SHARING . . . BEING: Digital online photography and identity construction. Research MA Artistic Research Master Thesis, June 2015, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
AyrtonR (2018) The micro-dynamics of power and performance in focus groups: An example from discussions on national identity with the South Sudanese diaspora in the UK. Qualitative Research. Published online first, 14February.
6.
Banet-WeiserSMiltnerKM (2016) #MasculinitySoFragile: Culture, structure, and networked misogyny. Feminist Media Studies16(1): 171–174. DOI: 10.1080/14680777.2016.1120490.
7.
Banet-WeiserSGillRRottenbergC (2019) Postfeminism, popular feminism and neoliberal feminism? Sarah Banet-Weiser, Rosalind Gill and Catherine Rottenberg in conversation. Feminist Theory. Published online first, 23April. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700119842555.
8.
BarryAOsborneTRoseN (eds) (1996) Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism, and Rationalities of Government. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
BeauvoirS (2010) The Second Sex. New York: Vintage Books.
10.
BerardiF (2014) And: Phenomenology of the End. Cognition and Sensibility in the Transition from Conjunctive to Connective Mode of Social Communication. Helsinki: Aalto Art Books.
11.
BucherT (2017) The algorithmic imaginary: Exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society20(1): 30–44.
12.
BullinghamLVasconcelosAC (2013) The presentation of self in the online world: Goffman and the study of online identities. Journal of Information Science39(1): 101–112.
13.
BurchellGGordonCMillerP (eds) (1991) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
BurnsA (2015) Self(ie)-discipline: Social regulation as enacted through the discussion of photographic practice. International Journal of Communication9(Feature): 1716–1733.
15.
ButlerJ (2004) Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.
16.
CambreCLavrenceC (2018) Encounters that open up problems: A critical path for post-structuralist inquiry. In: MichalskiJ (ed.) Sociological Theory, Methods, and Perspectives. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, 185–206.
17.
CouldryNHeppA (2017) The Mediated Construction of Reality. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.
18.
Cruz and Thornham (2015) Selfies beyond self-representation: The (theoretical) f(r)ictions of a practice. Journal of Aesthtics and Culture (7)1: 1–11.
19.
DeanM (2010) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: SAGE.
20.
DobsonA (2015) Postfeminist Digital Cultures. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
DoucetAMauthnerX (2005) Feminist methodologies and epistemologies. In: BryantCDPeckDL (eds) Handbook of 21st Century Sociology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 26–32.
22.
FlisfederM (2015) The entrepreneurial subject and the objectivization of the self in social media. South Atlantic Quarterly114(4): 553–570.
23.
FoucaultM (1977) Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In: BouchardDF (ed.) Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 76–100.
24.
FoucaultM (1988 [1981]) Practicing criticism. In: KritzmanLD (ed.) Michel Foucault: Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and Other Writings, 1977–1984. New York: Routledge, pp. 152–158.
25.
FoucaultM (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979 (trans. BurchellG). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
FoxJRooneyMC (2015) The Dark Triad and trait self-objectification as predictors of men’s use and self-presentation behaviors on social networking sites. Personality and Individual Differences76(April): 161–165.
27.
GabrielF (2014) Sexting, selfies and self-harm: Young people, social media and the performance of self-development. Media International Australia151(1): 104–112.
28.
GilbertKE (2017) Policing evaluation: ‘Focus group interviews as an embodied speech event’Discourse & Communication11(4): 341–361.
29.
GillR (2007) Post-feminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies10(2): 147–166.
30.
GillR (2016) Post-feminism? New feminist visibilities in postfeminist times. Feminist Media Studies16(4): 610–630.
31.
GillR (2017) The affective, cultural and psychic life of postfeminism: A postfeminist sensibility 10 years on. European Journal of Cultural Studies20(6): 606–626.
32.
GillRScharffC (eds) (2011) New Femininities: Postfeminism, Neoliberalism and Subjectivity. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
33.
GilmoreDM (2014) Goffman’s front stage and backstage behaviours in online education. Journal of Learning Analytics1(3): 187–190.
34.
GoffmanE (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
35.
GrosserB (2014) What do metrics want? How quantification prescribes social interaction on Facebook. Computational Culture. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
36.
HarawayD (1991) Simians, Cyborgs, Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
KellerJMendesKRingroseJ (2018 [2016]) Speaking ‘unspeakable things’: documenting digital feminist responses to rape culture. Journal of Gender Studies27(1): 22–36.
39.
KhannaASharmaMK (2017) Selfie use: The implications for psychopathology expression of body dysmorphic disorder. Industrial Psychiatry Journal26(1): 106–109.
40.
LaugheyD (2007) Key Themes in Media Theory. New York: Open University Press.
41.
AnonymizedC (2017) Unpublished field notes.
42.
LavrenceCLozanskiK (2014) This is not your practice life: Lululemon and the neoliberal governance of self. Canadian Review of Sociology51(1): 76–94.
43.
MarwickAE (2015) Instafame: Luxury selfies in the attention economy. Public Culture27: 137–160.
44.
MasheroniGVincentJJimenezE (2015) Girls are addicted to likes so they post semi-naked selfies. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace9(1): 1–5.
45.
McRobbieA (2004) Post-feminism and popular culture. Feminist Media Studies4(3): 255–264.
46.
McRobbieA (2009) The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: SAGE.
47.
MendesKRingroseJKellerJ (2018) #MeToo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism. European Journal of Women’s Studies25(2): 236–246.
48.
MurrayC (2015) Notes to self: The visual culture of selfies in the age of social media. Consumption Markets and Culture18(6): 490–516.
49.
MillerH (1995) The presentation of self in electronic life: Goffman on the Internet. In: Embodied Knowledge and Virtual SpaceConference Goldsmiths College, University of London, June 1995. Available at: http://www.douri.sh/classes/ics234cw04/miller2.pdf (accessed 28 September 2018).
50.
NadesanMH (2002) Engineering the entrepreneurial infant: Brain science, infant development toys, and governmentality. Cultural Studies16(3): 401–432.
51.
OlszanowskiM (2014) Feminist self-imaging and Instagram. Visual Communication Quarterly21(2): 83–95.
52.
PhamMHT (2015) ‘I click and post and breathe, waiting for others to see what I see’: On #Feministselfies, outfit photos, and networked vanity. Fashion Theory19(2): 221–242.
53.
PostmanN (1998) Five things we need to know about technological change. Available at: https://www.technodystopica.org (accessed 1 August 2018).
54.
Quinn PattonM (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
55.
RettenbergJ (2014) Seeing Ourselves Through Technology: How We Use Selfies, Blogs and Wearable Devices to Define Ourselves. New York: Palgrave.
56.
ReyPJ (2012) Alienation, exploitation, and social media. American Behavioral Scientist (56)4: 399–420.
57.
RimkeH (2000) Governing citizens through self-help literature. Cultural Studies14(1): 61–78.
SchwarzO (2010) On friendship, boobs and the logic of the catalogue online self-portraits as a means for the exchange of capital. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies16(2): 163–183.
62.
SenftTBaymN (2015) What does the selfie say?International Journal of Communication9(19): 1588–1606.
63.
ShinYKimMImCChongSC (2017) Selfie and self: The effect of selfies on self-esteem and social sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences111(1): 139–145.
64.
ShoveEPantzarMWatsonM (2012) The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes. London: SAGE.
65.
TagarelliAInterdonatoR (2014) Lurking in social networks: Topology-based analysis and ranking methods. Social Network Analysis and Mining4: 230.
66.
TiidenbergK (2015) Odes to heteronormativity: Presentations of femininity in Russian-speaking pregnant women’s Instagram accounts. International Journal of Communication9: 1746–1758.
67.
VatsM (2015) Selfie syndrome: An infectious gift of IT to health care. Journal of Lung, Pulmonary & Respiratory Research2(4): 70–71.
68.
WarfieldKCambreCAbidinC (2016) Introduction to inter-faces and me-diated bodies. Social Media +Society (April–June): 1–5.
69.
ZwickDBradshawA (2016) Biopolitical marketing and social media brand communities. Theory, Culture and Society33(5): 91–115.
